On 20.04.23 17:43, Eric Blake wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 20, 2023 at 01:52:30AM +0300, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
>> To be used in the next commit.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@yandex-team.ru>
>> ---
>> scripts/qapi/types.py | 2 ++
>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/scripts/qapi/types.py b/scripts/qapi/types.py
>> index c39d054d2c..18f8734047 100644
>> --- a/scripts/qapi/types.py
>> +++ b/scripts/qapi/types.py
>> @@ -61,10 +61,12 @@ def gen_enum_lookup(name: str,
>>
>> special_features = gen_special_features(memb.features)
>> if special_features != '0':
>> + feats += memb.ifcond.gen_if()
>> feats += mcgen('''
>> [%(index)s] = %(special_features)s,
>> ''',
>> index=index, special_features=special_features)
>> + feats += memb.ifcond.gen_endif()
>
> Perhaps Markus will have a comment here; but in general, changes to
> the QAPI that don't have accompanying changes in the testsuite are
> hard to prove that they do something useful.
>
> At a minimum, the commit message should at least say what sort of
> things are not permitted without this patch that are now possible,
> rather than making me figure out what the next patch uses that failed
> the QAPI generator without this patch.
>
OK, I'll improve the commit message if we decide to keep patch 3 as is.
Actually patch would be more obvious if have a bit more code context: just above this same gen_if()s are called to generate #ifdefs for enum members.
--
Best regards,
Vladimir