On 03.03.23 18:19, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> mutex->from_push and mutex->handoff in qemu-coroutine-lock implement
> the familiar pattern:
>
> write a write b
> smp_mb() smp_mb()
> read b read a
>
> The memory barrier is required by the C memory model even after a
> SEQ_CST read-modify-write operation such as QSLIST_INSERT_HEAD_ATOMIC.
> Add it and avoid the unclear qatomic_mb_read() operation.
>
> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
> ---
> util/qemu-coroutine-lock.c | 9 ++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/util/qemu-coroutine-lock.c b/util/qemu-coroutine-lock.c
> index 58f3f771817b..84a50a9e9117 100644
> --- a/util/qemu-coroutine-lock.c
> +++ b/util/qemu-coroutine-lock.c
> @@ -201,10 +201,16 @@ static void coroutine_fn qemu_co_mutex_lock_slowpath(AioContext *ctx,
> trace_qemu_co_mutex_lock_entry(mutex, self);
> push_waiter(mutex, &w);
>
> + /*
> + * Add waiter before reading mutex->handoff. Pairs with qatomic_mb_set
> + * in qemu_co_mutex_unlock.
> + */
> + smp_mb__after_rmw();
> +
> /* This is the "Responsibility Hand-Off" protocol; a lock() picks from
> * a concurrent unlock() the responsibility of waking somebody up.
> */
> - old_handoff = qatomic_mb_read(&mutex->handoff);
> + old_handoff = qatomic_read(&mutex->handoff);
> if (old_handoff &&
> has_waiters(mutex) &&
> qatomic_cmpxchg(&mutex->handoff, old_handoff, 0) == old_handoff) {
> @@ -303,6 +309,7 @@ void coroutine_fn qemu_co_mutex_unlock(CoMutex *mutex)
> }
>
> our_handoff = mutex->sequence;
> + /* Set handoff before checking for waiters. */
> qatomic_mb_set(&mutex->handoff, our_handoff);
> if (!has_waiters(mutex)) {
> /* The concurrent lock has not added itself yet, so it
Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
--
Thanks,
David / dhildenb