softmmu/physmem.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
From: Samker <nyoro.martin@gmail.com>
This is patch replaces WITH_QEMU_LOCK_GUARD() call with the
QEMU_LOCK_GUARD()
Signed-off-by: Samker <nyoro.martin@gmail.com>
---
softmmu/physmem.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/softmmu/physmem.c b/softmmu/physmem.c
index fb00596777..907491ae17 100644
--- a/softmmu/physmem.c
+++ b/softmmu/physmem.c
@@ -3115,7 +3115,7 @@ void cpu_register_map_client(QEMUBH *bh)
{
MapClient *client = g_malloc(sizeof(*client));
- WITH_QEMU_LOCK_GUARD(&map_client_list_lock);
+ QEMU_LOCK_GUARD(&map_client_list_lock);
client->bh = bh;
QLIST_INSERT_HEAD(&map_client_list, client, link);
if (!qatomic_read(&bounce.in_use)) {
@@ -3143,7 +3143,7 @@ void cpu_unregister_map_client(QEMUBH *bh)
{
MapClient *client;
- WITH_QEMU_LOCK_GUARD(&map_client_list_lock);
+ QEMU_LOCK_GUARD(&map_client_list_lock);
QLIST_FOREACH(client, &map_client_list, link) {
if (client->bh == bh) {
cpu_unregister_map_client_do(client);
--
2.25.1
nyoro.gachu@gmail.com writes:
> From: Samker <nyoro.martin@gmail.com>
>
> This is patch replaces WITH_QEMU_LOCK_GUARD() call with the
> QEMU_LOCK_GUARD()
You could extend this description as to why ".. because it extends the
scope of the lock to the whole function rather than the non-existent
block".
Otherwise:
Reviewed-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
>
> Signed-off-by: Samker <nyoro.martin@gmail.com>
> ---
> softmmu/physmem.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/softmmu/physmem.c b/softmmu/physmem.c
> index fb00596777..907491ae17 100644
> --- a/softmmu/physmem.c
> +++ b/softmmu/physmem.c
> @@ -3115,7 +3115,7 @@ void cpu_register_map_client(QEMUBH *bh)
> {
> MapClient *client = g_malloc(sizeof(*client));
>
> - WITH_QEMU_LOCK_GUARD(&map_client_list_lock);
> + QEMU_LOCK_GUARD(&map_client_list_lock);
> client->bh = bh;
> QLIST_INSERT_HEAD(&map_client_list, client, link);
> if (!qatomic_read(&bounce.in_use)) {
> @@ -3143,7 +3143,7 @@ void cpu_unregister_map_client(QEMUBH *bh)
> {
> MapClient *client;
>
> - WITH_QEMU_LOCK_GUARD(&map_client_list_lock);
> + QEMU_LOCK_GUARD(&map_client_list_lock);
> QLIST_FOREACH(client, &map_client_list, link) {
> if (client->bh == bh) {
> cpu_unregister_map_client_do(client);
--
Alex Bennée
Hi,
On 8/11/22 06:11, nyoro.gachu@gmail.com wrote:
> From: Samker <nyoro.martin@gmail.com>
>
> This is patch replaces WITH_QEMU_LOCK_GUARD() call with the
> QEMU_LOCK_GUARD()
>
> Signed-off-by: Samker <nyoro.martin@gmail.com>
> ---
> softmmu/physmem.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/softmmu/physmem.c b/softmmu/physmem.c
> index fb00596777..907491ae17 100644
> --- a/softmmu/physmem.c
> +++ b/softmmu/physmem.c
> @@ -3115,7 +3115,7 @@ void cpu_register_map_client(QEMUBH *bh)
> {
> MapClient *client = g_malloc(sizeof(*client));
>
> - WITH_QEMU_LOCK_GUARD(&map_client_list_lock);
> + QEMU_LOCK_GUARD(&map_client_list_lock);
> client->bh = bh;
> QLIST_INSERT_HEAD(&map_client_list, client, link);
> if (!qatomic_read(&bounce.in_use)) {
> @@ -3143,7 +3143,7 @@ void cpu_unregister_map_client(QEMUBH *bh)
> {
> MapClient *client;
>
> - WITH_QEMU_LOCK_GUARD(&map_client_list_lock);
> + QEMU_LOCK_GUARD(&map_client_list_lock);
> QLIST_FOREACH(client, &map_client_list, link) {
> if (client->bh == bh) {
> cpu_unregister_map_client_do(client);
This patch doesn't apply...
$ git grep QEMU_LOCK_GUARD origin/master -- softmmu/physmem.c
$
On what is it based?
Hi Philippe, > This patch doesn't apply... > $ git grep QEMU_LOCK_GUARD origin/master -- softmmu/physmem.c > $ > On what is it based? I initially replaced lock()/unlock() calls in the softmmu/physmem.c with the more preferred WITH_QEMU_LOCK_GUARD() call. However Stefan pointed out that instead I should have used QEMU_LOCK_GUARD when I don't want to use block scope.
© 2016 - 2026 Red Hat, Inc.