The previous patch wrongly replaced FEAT_XSAVE_XCR0_{LO|HI} with
FEAT_XSAVE_XSS_{LO|HI} in CPUID(EAX=12,ECX=1):{ECX,EDX}, which made
SGX enclave only supported SSE and x87 feature(xfrm=0x3).
Fixes: 301e90675c3f ("target/i386: Enable support for XSAVES based features")
Signed-off-by: Yang Zhong <yang.zhong@linux.intel.com>
---
target/i386/cpu.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/target/i386/cpu.c b/target/i386/cpu.c
index ad623d91e4..19aaed877b 100644
--- a/target/i386/cpu.c
+++ b/target/i386/cpu.c
@@ -5584,8 +5584,8 @@ void cpu_x86_cpuid(CPUX86State *env, uint32_t index, uint32_t count,
} else {
*eax &= env->features[FEAT_SGX_12_1_EAX];
*ebx &= 0; /* ebx reserve */
- *ecx &= env->features[FEAT_XSAVE_XSS_LO];
- *edx &= env->features[FEAT_XSAVE_XSS_HI];
+ *ecx &= env->features[FEAT_XSAVE_XCR0_LO];
+ *edx &= env->features[FEAT_XSAVE_XCR0_HI];
/* FP and SSE are always allowed regardless of XSAVE/XCR0. */
*ecx |= XSTATE_FP_MASK | XSTATE_SSE_MASK;
--
2.30.2
On 10/26/2022 7:57 PM, Zhong, Yang wrote:
> The previous patch wrongly replaced FEAT_XSAVE_XCR0_{LO|HI} with
> FEAT_XSAVE_XSS_{LO|HI} in CPUID(EAX=12,ECX=1):{ECX,EDX}, which made
> SGX enclave only supported SSE and x87 feature(xfrm=0x3).
>
> Fixes: 301e90675c3f ("target/i386: Enable support for XSAVES based features")
>
> Signed-off-by: Yang Zhong <yang.zhong@linux.intel.com>
> ---
> target/i386/cpu.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/target/i386/cpu.c b/target/i386/cpu.c
> index ad623d91e4..19aaed877b 100644
> --- a/target/i386/cpu.c
> +++ b/target/i386/cpu.c
> @@ -5584,8 +5584,8 @@ void cpu_x86_cpuid(CPUX86State *env, uint32_t index, uint32_t count,
> } else {
> *eax &= env->features[FEAT_SGX_12_1_EAX];
> *ebx &= 0; /* ebx reserve */
> - *ecx &= env->features[FEAT_XSAVE_XSS_LO];
> - *edx &= env->features[FEAT_XSAVE_XSS_HI];
> + *ecx &= env->features[FEAT_XSAVE_XCR0_LO];
> + *edx &= env->features[FEAT_XSAVE_XCR0_HI];
Oops, that's my fault to replace with wrong definitions, thanks for the fix!
Reviewed-by: Yang Weijiang <weijiang.yang@intel.com>
>
> /* FP and SSE are always allowed regardless of XSAVE/XCR0. */
> *ecx |= XSTATE_FP_MASK | XSTATE_SSE_MASK;
On Thu, Oct 27, 2022 at 2:36 AM Yang, Weijiang <weijiang.yang@intel.com> wrote:
>
>
> On 10/26/2022 7:57 PM, Zhong, Yang wrote:
> > The previous patch wrongly replaced FEAT_XSAVE_XCR0_{LO|HI} with
> > FEAT_XSAVE_XSS_{LO|HI} in CPUID(EAX=12,ECX=1):{ECX,EDX}, which made
> > SGX enclave only supported SSE and x87 feature(xfrm=0x3).
> >
> > Fixes: 301e90675c3f ("target/i386: Enable support for XSAVES based features")
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Yang Zhong <yang.zhong@linux.intel.com>
> > ---
> > target/i386/cpu.c | 4 ++--
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/target/i386/cpu.c b/target/i386/cpu.c
> > index ad623d91e4..19aaed877b 100644
> > --- a/target/i386/cpu.c
> > +++ b/target/i386/cpu.c
> > @@ -5584,8 +5584,8 @@ void cpu_x86_cpuid(CPUX86State *env, uint32_t index, uint32_t count,
> > } else {
> > *eax &= env->features[FEAT_SGX_12_1_EAX];
> > *ebx &= 0; /* ebx reserve */
> > - *ecx &= env->features[FEAT_XSAVE_XSS_LO];
> > - *edx &= env->features[FEAT_XSAVE_XSS_HI];
> > + *ecx &= env->features[FEAT_XSAVE_XCR0_LO];
> > + *edx &= env->features[FEAT_XSAVE_XCR0_HI];
>
> Oops, that's my fault to replace with wrong definitions, thanks for the fix!
>
> Reviewed-by: Yang Weijiang <weijiang.yang@intel.com>
Hi,
I do not have any background on this but stumbled over this and wondered,
is there any particular reason why this wasn't applied yet?
It seemed to fix a former mistake, was acked and then ... silence
> >
> > /* FP and SSE are always allowed regardless of XSAVE/XCR0. */
> > *ecx |= XSTATE_FP_MASK | XSTATE_SSE_MASK;
>
--
Christian Ehrhardt
Senior Staff Engineer, Ubuntu Server
Canonical Ltd
On 3/27/2023 3:33 PM, Christian Ehrhardt wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 27, 2022 at 2:36 AM Yang, Weijiang <weijiang.yang@intel.com> wrote:
>>
>> On 10/26/2022 7:57 PM, Zhong, Yang wrote:
>>> The previous patch wrongly replaced FEAT_XSAVE_XCR0_{LO|HI} with
>>> FEAT_XSAVE_XSS_{LO|HI} in CPUID(EAX=12,ECX=1):{ECX,EDX}, which made
>>> SGX enclave only supported SSE and x87 feature(xfrm=0x3).
>>>
>>> Fixes: 301e90675c3f ("target/i386: Enable support for XSAVES based features")
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Yang Zhong <yang.zhong@linux.intel.com>
>>> ---
>>> target/i386/cpu.c | 4 ++--
>>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/target/i386/cpu.c b/target/i386/cpu.c
>>> index ad623d91e4..19aaed877b 100644
>>> --- a/target/i386/cpu.c
>>> +++ b/target/i386/cpu.c
>>> @@ -5584,8 +5584,8 @@ void cpu_x86_cpuid(CPUX86State *env, uint32_t index, uint32_t count,
>>> } else {
>>> *eax &= env->features[FEAT_SGX_12_1_EAX];
>>> *ebx &= 0; /* ebx reserve */
>>> - *ecx &= env->features[FEAT_XSAVE_XSS_LO];
>>> - *edx &= env->features[FEAT_XSAVE_XSS_HI];
>>> + *ecx &= env->features[FEAT_XSAVE_XCR0_LO];
>>> + *edx &= env->features[FEAT_XSAVE_XCR0_HI];
>> Oops, that's my fault to replace with wrong definitions, thanks for the fix!
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Yang Weijiang <weijiang.yang@intel.com>
> Hi,
> I do not have any background on this but stumbled over this and wondered,
> is there any particular reason why this wasn't applied yet?
>
> It seemed to fix a former mistake, was acked and then ... silence
Chris, thanks for the catch!
I double checked this patch isn't in the latest 8.0.0-rc1 tree.
Hi, Paolo,
Could you help merge this fixup patch? Thanks!
>
>>> /* FP and SSE are always allowed regardless of XSAVE/XCR0. */
>>> *ecx |= XSTATE_FP_MASK | XSTATE_SSE_MASK;
>
On Mon, Mar 27, 2023 at 04:03:54PM +0800, Yang, Weijiang wrote:
>
> On 3/27/2023 3:33 PM, Christian Ehrhardt wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 27, 2022 at 2:36 AM Yang, Weijiang <weijiang.yang@intel.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > On 10/26/2022 7:57 PM, Zhong, Yang wrote:
> > > > The previous patch wrongly replaced FEAT_XSAVE_XCR0_{LO|HI} with
> > > > FEAT_XSAVE_XSS_{LO|HI} in CPUID(EAX=12,ECX=1):{ECX,EDX}, which made
> > > > SGX enclave only supported SSE and x87 feature(xfrm=0x3).
> > > >
> > > > Fixes: 301e90675c3f ("target/i386: Enable support for XSAVES based features")
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Yang Zhong <yang.zhong@linux.intel.com>
> > > > ---
> > > > target/i386/cpu.c | 4 ++--
> > > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/target/i386/cpu.c b/target/i386/cpu.c
> > > > index ad623d91e4..19aaed877b 100644
> > > > --- a/target/i386/cpu.c
> > > > +++ b/target/i386/cpu.c
> > > > @@ -5584,8 +5584,8 @@ void cpu_x86_cpuid(CPUX86State *env, uint32_t index, uint32_t count,
> > > > } else {
> > > > *eax &= env->features[FEAT_SGX_12_1_EAX];
> > > > *ebx &= 0; /* ebx reserve */
> > > > - *ecx &= env->features[FEAT_XSAVE_XSS_LO];
> > > > - *edx &= env->features[FEAT_XSAVE_XSS_HI];
> > > > + *ecx &= env->features[FEAT_XSAVE_XCR0_LO];
> > > > + *edx &= env->features[FEAT_XSAVE_XCR0_HI];
> > > Oops, that's my fault to replace with wrong definitions, thanks for the fix!
> > >
> > > Reviewed-by: Yang Weijiang <weijiang.yang@intel.com>
> > Hi,
> > I do not have any background on this but stumbled over this and wondered,
> > is there any particular reason why this wasn't applied yet?
> >
> > It seemed to fix a former mistake, was acked and then ... silence
>
> Chris, thanks for the catch!
>
> I double checked this patch isn't in the latest 8.0.0-rc1 tree.
>
>
> Hi, Paolo,
>
> Could you help merge this fixup patch? Thanks!
Hello all,
Let me rebase this patch and resend it, thanks!
Yang
>
> >
> > > > /* FP and SSE are always allowed regardless of XSAVE/XCR0. */
> > > > *ecx |= XSTATE_FP_MASK | XSTATE_SSE_MASK;
> >
© 2016 - 2026 Red Hat, Inc.