On Mon, Oct 17, 2022 at 3:52 PM Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> It will be used in followup commits to figure out if
> device has it's own, device specific AML block.
>
> Signed-off-by: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Ani Sinha <ani@anisinha.ca>
> ---
> include/hw/acpi/acpi_aml_interface.h | 13 +++++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/hw/acpi/acpi_aml_interface.h b/include/hw/acpi/acpi_aml_interface.h
> index ab76f0e55d..436da069d6 100644
> --- a/include/hw/acpi/acpi_aml_interface.h
> +++ b/include/hw/acpi/acpi_aml_interface.h
> @@ -29,11 +29,20 @@ struct AcpiDevAmlIfClass {
> dev_aml_fn build_dev_aml;
> };
>
> -static inline void call_dev_aml_func(DeviceState *dev, Aml *scope)
> +static inline dev_aml_fn get_dev_aml_func(DeviceState *dev)
> {
> if (object_dynamic_cast(OBJECT(dev), TYPE_ACPI_DEV_AML_IF)) {
> AcpiDevAmlIfClass *klass = ACPI_DEV_AML_IF_GET_CLASS(dev);
> - klass->build_dev_aml(ACPI_DEV_AML_IF(dev), scope);
> + return klass->build_dev_aml;
> + }
> + return NULL;
> +}
> +
> +static inline void call_dev_aml_func(DeviceState *dev, Aml *scope)
> +{
> + dev_aml_fn fn = get_dev_aml_func(dev);
> + if (fn) {
> + fn(ACPI_DEV_AML_IF(dev), scope);
> }
> }
>
> --
> 2.31.1
>