Deduplicate code by using highest_offset() helper.

Signed-off-by: Alexander Ivanov <alexander.ivanov@virtuozzo.com>
---
 block/parallels.c | 11 ++---------
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/block/parallels.c b/block/parallels.c
index 339ce45634..688aa081e2 100644
--- a/block/parallels.c
+++ b/block/parallels.c
@@ -535,16 +535,9 @@ static int parallels_check_leak(BlockDriverState *bs,
                                 BdrvCheckMode fix)
 {
     BDRVParallelsState *s = bs->opaque;
-    int64_t off, high_off, count, cut_out;
-    uint32_t i;
+    int64_t high_off, count, cut_out;
 
-    high_off = 0;
-    for (i = 0; i < s->bat_size; i++) {
-        off = bat2sect(s, i) << BDRV_SECTOR_BITS;
-        if (off > high_off) {
-            high_off = off;
-        }
-    }
+    high_off = highest_offset(s);
 
     cut_out = parallels_handle_leak(bs, res, high_off, fix & BDRV_FIX_LEAKS);
     if (cut_out < 0) {
-- 
2.34.1

On 9/2/22 10:52, Alexander Ivanov wrote:
> Deduplicate code by using highest_offset() helper.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alexander Ivanov <alexander.ivanov@virtuozzo.com>
> ---
>   block/parallels.c | 11 ++---------
>   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/block/parallels.c b/block/parallels.c
> index 339ce45634..688aa081e2 100644
> --- a/block/parallels.c
> +++ b/block/parallels.c
> @@ -535,16 +535,9 @@ static int parallels_check_leak(BlockDriverState *bs,
>                                   BdrvCheckMode fix)
>   {
>       BDRVParallelsState *s = bs->opaque;
> -    int64_t off, high_off, count, cut_out;
> -    uint32_t i;
> +    int64_t high_off, count, cut_out;
>   
> -    high_off = 0;
> -    for (i = 0; i < s->bat_size; i++) {
> -        off = bat2sect(s, i) << BDRV_SECTOR_BITS;
> -        if (off > high_off) {
> -            high_off = off;
> -        }
> -    }
> +    high_off = highest_offset(s);
>   
>       cut_out = parallels_handle_leak(bs, res, high_off, fix & BDRV_FIX_LEAKS);
>       if (cut_out < 0) {
Here I kinda disagree. This change and the introduction of the
helper should be done exactly in the same patch as in the other
case it is not possible to say whether this replacement is
correct or not.

Den