From: Eugenio Pérez <eperezma@redhat.com>
It was easier to allow vhost_svq_add to handle the memory. Now that we
will allow qemu to add elements to a SVQ without the guest's knowledge,
it's better to handle it in the caller.
Signed-off-by: Eugenio Pérez <eperezma@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
hw/virtio/vhost-shadow-virtqueue.c | 10 ++++------
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/hw/virtio/vhost-shadow-virtqueue.c b/hw/virtio/vhost-shadow-virtqueue.c
index 82a784d..a1261d4 100644
@@ -233,9 +233,6 @@ static void vhost_svq_kick(VhostShadowVirtqueue *svq)
/**
* Add an element to a SVQ.
*
- * The caller must check that there is enough slots for the new element. It
- * takes ownership of the element: In case of failure not ENOSPC, it is free.
- *
* Return -EINVAL if element is invalid, -ENOSPC if dev queue is full
*/
int vhost_svq_add(VhostShadowVirtqueue *svq, const struct iovec *out_sg,
@@ -252,7 +249,6 @@ int vhost_svq_add(VhostShadowVirtqueue *svq, const struct iovec *out_sg,
ok = vhost_svq_add_split(svq, out_sg, out_num, in_sg, in_num, &qemu_head);
if (unlikely(!ok)) {
- g_free(elem);
return -EINVAL;
}
@@ -293,7 +289,7 @@ static void vhost_handle_guest_kick(VhostShadowVirtqueue *svq)
virtio_queue_set_notification(svq->vq, false);
while (true) {
- VirtQueueElement *elem;
+ g_autofree VirtQueueElement *elem;
int r;
if (svq->next_guest_avail_elem) {
@@ -324,12 +320,14 @@ static void vhost_handle_guest_kick(VhostShadowVirtqueue *svq)
* queue the current guest descriptor and ignore kicks
* until some elements are used.
*/
- svq->next_guest_avail_elem = elem;
+ svq->next_guest_avail_elem = g_steal_pointer(&elem);
}
/* VQ is full or broken, just return and ignore kicks */
return;
}
+ /* elem belongs to SVQ or external caller now */
+ elem = NULL;
}
virtio_queue_set_notification(svq->vq, true);
--
2.7.4