From: Marc-André Lureau <marcandre.lureau@redhat.com>
The in/out handling is inverted, although nothing seemed to notice that yet.
Signed-off-by: Marc-André Lureau <marcandre.lureau@redhat.com>
---
io/channel-command.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/io/channel-command.c b/io/channel-command.c
index 9f2f4a1793..ed17b44f74 100644
--- a/io/channel-command.c
+++ b/io/channel-command.c
@@ -79,10 +79,10 @@ qio_channel_command_new_spawn(const char *const argv[],
flags = flags & O_ACCMODE;
if (flags == O_RDONLY) {
- stdinnull = true;
+ stdoutnull = true;
}
if (flags == O_WRONLY) {
- stdoutnull = true;
+ stdinnull = true;
}
if (stdinnull || stdoutnull) {
--
2.37.2
On Thu, Sep 01, 2022 at 02:11:20PM +0400, marcandre.lureau@redhat.com wrote:
> From: Marc-André Lureau <marcandre.lureau@redhat.com>
>
> The in/out handling is inverted, although nothing seemed to notice that yet.
On the contrary, it is correct, and the unit tests validate this.
> Signed-off-by: Marc-André Lureau <marcandre.lureau@redhat.com>
> ---
> io/channel-command.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/io/channel-command.c b/io/channel-command.c
> index 9f2f4a1793..ed17b44f74 100644
> --- a/io/channel-command.c
> +++ b/io/channel-command.c
> @@ -79,10 +79,10 @@ qio_channel_command_new_spawn(const char *const argv[],
> flags = flags & O_ACCMODE;
>
> if (flags == O_RDONLY) {
> - stdinnull = true;
> + stdoutnull = true;
> }
> if (flags == O_WRONLY) {
> - stdoutnull = true;
> + stdinnull = true;
> }
This change breaks the unit tests.
The confusion is because there are two parties involves. The 'flags'
variable is from the POV of the parent process, while stdinnull/stdoutnull
are from the POV of the child process.
IOW, if the parent process is reading from the child (O_RDONLY),
then the child needs a stdout to write to the parent, but not
any stdin to read from the parent, hence we set stdin to /dev/null
in the child.
With regards,
Daniel
--
|: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
|: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
|: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|
Hi
On Thu, Sep 1, 2022 at 2:32 PM Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com>
wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 01, 2022 at 02:11:20PM +0400, marcandre.lureau@redhat.com
> wrote:
> > From: Marc-André Lureau <marcandre.lureau@redhat.com>
> >
> > The in/out handling is inverted, although nothing seemed to notice that
> yet.
>
> On the contrary, it is correct, and the unit tests validate this.
>
> > Signed-off-by: Marc-André Lureau <marcandre.lureau@redhat.com>
> > ---
> > io/channel-command.c | 4 ++--
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/io/channel-command.c b/io/channel-command.c
> > index 9f2f4a1793..ed17b44f74 100644
> > --- a/io/channel-command.c
> > +++ b/io/channel-command.c
> > @@ -79,10 +79,10 @@ qio_channel_command_new_spawn(const char *const
> argv[],
> > flags = flags & O_ACCMODE;
> >
> > if (flags == O_RDONLY) {
> > - stdinnull = true;
> > + stdoutnull = true;
> > }
> > if (flags == O_WRONLY) {
> > - stdoutnull = true;
> > + stdinnull = true;
> > }
>
> This change breaks the unit tests.
>
>
Does it really test it then? we are talking about test-io-channel-command ?
It works before and after for me. Other tests as well.
The confusion is because there are two parties involves. The 'flags'
> variable is from the POV of the parent process, while stdinnull/stdoutnull
> are from the POV of the child process.
>
> IOW, if the parent process is reading from the child (O_RDONLY),
> then the child needs a stdout to write to the parent, but not
> any stdin to read from the parent, hence we set stdin to /dev/null
> in the child.
>
Ok, thanks for the clarification!
--
Marc-André Lureau
On Thu, Sep 01, 2022 at 02:47:17PM +0400, Marc-André Lureau wrote:
> Hi
>
> On Thu, Sep 1, 2022 at 2:32 PM Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com>
> wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Sep 01, 2022 at 02:11:20PM +0400, marcandre.lureau@redhat.com
> > wrote:
> > > From: Marc-André Lureau <marcandre.lureau@redhat.com>
> > >
> > > The in/out handling is inverted, although nothing seemed to notice that
> > yet.
> >
> > On the contrary, it is correct, and the unit tests validate this.
> >
>
> > > Signed-off-by: Marc-André Lureau <marcandre.lureau@redhat.com>
> > > ---
> > > io/channel-command.c | 4 ++--
> > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/io/channel-command.c b/io/channel-command.c
> > > index 9f2f4a1793..ed17b44f74 100644
> > > --- a/io/channel-command.c
> > > +++ b/io/channel-command.c
> > > @@ -79,10 +79,10 @@ qio_channel_command_new_spawn(const char *const
> > argv[],
> > > flags = flags & O_ACCMODE;
> > >
> > > if (flags == O_RDONLY) {
> > > - stdinnull = true;
> > > + stdoutnull = true;
> > > }
> > > if (flags == O_WRONLY) {
> > > - stdoutnull = true;
> > > + stdinnull = true;
> > > }
> >
> > This change breaks the unit tests.
> >
> >
> Does it really test it then? we are talking about test-io-channel-command ?
> It works before and after for me. Other tests as well.
Yes, it certainly fails for me:
$ ./build/tests/unit/test-io-channel-command -p /io/channel/command/fifo/sync
# random seed: R02S5134a426f643aeefdbe73921046b66da
# Start of io tests
# Start of channel tests
# Start of command tests
# Start of fifo tests
**
ERROR:../tests/unit/io-channel-helpers.c:152:qio_channel_test_validate: assertion failed: (test->readerr == NULL)
Bail out! ERROR:../tests/unit/io-channel-helpers.c:152:qio_channel_test_validate: assertion failed: (test->readerr == NULL)
Aborted (core dumped)
With regards,
Daniel
--
|: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
|: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
|: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|
© 2016 - 2026 Red Hat, Inc.