On 11/2/2022 8:49 AM, Xiaoyao Li wrote:
> On 7/12/2022 10:12 AM, Xiaoyao Li wrote:
>> The issue that fixed by Patch 1 looks fatal though it doesn't appear on
>> KVM because KVM always searches with assending order and hit with the
>> correct cpuid leaf 0.
>>
>> Patch 2 removes the wrong constraint on CPUID leaf 1f
>
> Kindly ping.
ping it one more time.
Does it need a rebase and resend?
>> Xiaoyao Li (2):
>> i386/cpuid: Decrease cpuid_i when skipping CPUID leaf 1F
>> i386/cpuid: Remove subleaf constraint on CPUID leaf 1F
>>
>> target/i386/kvm/kvm.c | 5 +----
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>
>