`cpu_pc` at this point does not necessary point to the current
instruction (i.e., the wait instruction being translated), so it's
incorrect to calculate the new value of `cpu_pc` based on this. It must
be updated with `ctx->base.pc_next`, which contains the correct address
of the next instruction.
This change fixes the wait instruction skipping the subsequent branch
when used in an idle loop like this:
0: wait
bra.b 0b
brk // should be unreachable
Signed-off-by: Tomoaki Kawada <i@yvt.jp>
---
target/rx/translate.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/target/rx/translate.c b/target/rx/translate.c
index 5db8f79a82..f8812e7a6c 100644
--- a/target/rx/translate.c
+++ b/target/rx/translate.c
@@ -2281,7 +2281,7 @@ static bool trans_INT(DisasContext *ctx, arg_INT *a)
static bool trans_WAIT(DisasContext *ctx, arg_WAIT *a)
{
if (is_privileged(ctx, 1)) {
- tcg_gen_addi_i32(cpu_pc, cpu_pc, 2);
+ tcg_gen_movi_i32(cpu_pc, ctx->base.pc_next);
gen_helper_wait(cpu_env);
}
return true;
--
2.35.1
On 4/16/22 23:02, Tomoaki Kawada wrote: > `cpu_pc` at this point does not necessary point to the current > instruction (i.e., the wait instruction being translated), so it's > incorrect to calculate the new value of `cpu_pc` based on this. It must > be updated with `ctx->base.pc_next`, which contains the correct address > of the next instruction. > > This change fixes the wait instruction skipping the subsequent branch > when used in an idle loop like this: > > 0: wait > bra.b 0b > brk // should be unreachable > > Signed-off-by: Tomoaki Kawada <i@yvt.jp> Queued to target-rx-next. r~
On Sun, 17 Apr 2022 15:02:25 +0900,
Tomoaki Kawada wrote:
>
> `cpu_pc` at this point does not necessary point to the current
> instruction (i.e., the wait instruction being translated), so it's
> incorrect to calculate the new value of `cpu_pc` based on this. It must
> be updated with `ctx->base.pc_next`, which contains the correct address
> of the next instruction.
>
> This change fixes the wait instruction skipping the subsequent branch
> when used in an idle loop like this:
>
> 0: wait
> bra.b 0b
> brk // should be unreachable
>
> Signed-off-by: Tomoaki Kawada <i@yvt.jp>
> ---
> target/rx/translate.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/target/rx/translate.c b/target/rx/translate.c
> index 5db8f79a82..f8812e7a6c 100644
> --- a/target/rx/translate.c
> +++ b/target/rx/translate.c
> @@ -2281,7 +2281,7 @@ static bool trans_INT(DisasContext *ctx, arg_INT *a)
> static bool trans_WAIT(DisasContext *ctx, arg_WAIT *a)
> {
> if (is_privileged(ctx, 1)) {
> - tcg_gen_addi_i32(cpu_pc, cpu_pc, 2);
> + tcg_gen_movi_i32(cpu_pc, ctx->base.pc_next);
> gen_helper_wait(cpu_env);
> }
> return true;
> --
> 2.35.1
>
Reviewed-by: Yoshinori Sato <ysato@users.sourceforge.jp>
--
Yosinori Sato
On 4/16/22 23:02, Tomoaki Kawada wrote:
> `cpu_pc` at this point does not necessary point to the current
> instruction (i.e., the wait instruction being translated), so it's
> incorrect to calculate the new value of `cpu_pc` based on this. It must
> be updated with `ctx->base.pc_next`, which contains the correct address
> of the next instruction.
>
> This change fixes the wait instruction skipping the subsequent branch
> when used in an idle loop like this:
>
> 0: wait
> bra.b 0b
> brk // should be unreachable
>
> Signed-off-by: Tomoaki Kawada <i@yvt.jp>
> ---
> target/rx/translate.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/target/rx/translate.c b/target/rx/translate.c
> index 5db8f79a82..f8812e7a6c 100644
> --- a/target/rx/translate.c
> +++ b/target/rx/translate.c
> @@ -2281,7 +2281,7 @@ static bool trans_INT(DisasContext *ctx, arg_INT *a)
> static bool trans_WAIT(DisasContext *ctx, arg_WAIT *a)
> {
> if (is_privileged(ctx, 1)) {
> - tcg_gen_addi_i32(cpu_pc, cpu_pc, 2);
> + tcg_gen_movi_i32(cpu_pc, ctx->base.pc_next);
> gen_helper_wait(cpu_env);
> }
> return true;
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
r~
© 2016 - 2026 Red Hat, Inc.