1. Patchew
  2. QEMU
  3. View series

[PATCH] hw/nvram: Add at24c-eeprom support for small eeproms

Patrick Venture posted 1 patch 2 years, 1 month ago
Test checkpatch passed
Patches applied successfully (tree, apply log)
git fetch https://github.com/patchew-project/qemu tags/patchew/20220314211158.4053690-1-venture@google.com
There is a newer version of this series
hw/nvram/eeprom_at24c.c | 52 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
1 file changed, 35 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
[PATCH] hw/nvram: Add at24c-eeprom support for small eeproms
Posted by Patrick Venture 2 years, 1 month ago 
Tested: Verified at24c02 driver happy and contents matched
expectations.

Signed-off-by: Patrick Venture <venture@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Hao Wu <wuhaotsh@google.com>
---
 hw/nvram/eeprom_at24c.c | 52 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
 1 file changed, 35 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)

diff --git a/hw/nvram/eeprom_at24c.c b/hw/nvram/eeprom_at24c.c
index 01a3093600..abf9898f94 100644
--- a/hw/nvram/eeprom_at24c.c
+++ b/hw/nvram/eeprom_at24c.c
@@ -45,6 +45,8 @@ struct EEPROMState {
     bool changed;
     /* during WRITE, # of address bytes transfered */
     uint8_t haveaddr;
+    /* whether it's 8-bit addressed or 16-bit */
+    bool eightbit;
 
     uint8_t *mem;
 
@@ -85,7 +87,7 @@ uint8_t at24c_eeprom_recv(I2CSlave *s)
     EEPROMState *ee = AT24C_EE(s);
     uint8_t ret;
 
-    if (ee->haveaddr == 1) {
+    if (ee->haveaddr == 1 && !ee->eightbit) {
         return 0xff;
     }
 
@@ -102,26 +104,35 @@ int at24c_eeprom_send(I2CSlave *s, uint8_t data)
 {
     EEPROMState *ee = AT24C_EE(s);
 
-    if (ee->haveaddr < 2) {
-        ee->cur <<= 8;
-        ee->cur |= data;
+    if (ee->haveaddr < 1) {
+        ee->cur = data;
         ee->haveaddr++;
-        if (ee->haveaddr == 2) {
-            ee->cur %= ee->rsize;
+        if (ee->eightbit) {
             DPRINTK("Set pointer %04x\n", ee->cur);
         }
+        return 0;
+    } else if (ee->haveaddr < 2) {
+        if (!ee->eightbit) {
+            ee->cur <<= 8;
+            ee->cur |= data;
+            ee->haveaddr++;
+            if (ee->haveaddr == 2) {
+                ee->cur %= ee->rsize;
+                DPRINTK("Set pointer %04x\n", ee->cur);
+            }
 
-    } else {
-        if (ee->writable) {
-            DPRINTK("Send %02x\n", data);
-            ee->mem[ee->cur] = data;
-            ee->changed = true;
-        } else {
-            DPRINTK("Send error %02x read-only\n", data);
+            return 0;
         }
-        ee->cur = (ee->cur + 1u) % ee->rsize;
+    }
 
+    if (ee->writable) {
+        DPRINTK("Send %02x\n", data);
+        ee->mem[ee->cur] = data;
+        ee->changed = true;
+    } else {
+        DPRINTK("Send error %02x read-only\n", data);
     }
+    ee->cur = (ee->cur + 1u) % ee->rsize;
 
     return 0;
 }
@@ -131,12 +142,16 @@ static void at24c_eeprom_realize(DeviceState *dev, Error **errp)
     EEPROMState *ee = AT24C_EE(dev);
 
     if (ee->blk) {
+        /* blk length is a minimum of 1 sector. */
         int64_t len = blk_getlength(ee->blk);
 
         if (len != ee->rsize) {
-            error_setg(errp, "%s: Backing file size %" PRId64 " != %u",
-                       TYPE_AT24C_EE, len, ee->rsize);
-            return;
+            /* for the at24c01 and at24c02, they are smaller than a sector. */
+            if (ee->rsize >= BDRV_SECTOR_SIZE) {
+                error_setg(errp, "%s: Backing file size %" PRId64 " != %u",
+                           TYPE_AT24C_EE, len, ee->rsize);
+                return;
+            }
         }
 
         if (blk_set_perm(ee->blk, BLK_PERM_CONSISTENT_READ | BLK_PERM_WRITE,
@@ -148,6 +163,9 @@ static void at24c_eeprom_realize(DeviceState *dev, Error **errp)
         }
     }
 
+    if (ee->rsize < 512) {
+        ee->eightbit = true;
+    }
     ee->mem = g_malloc0(ee->rsize);
 }
 
-- 
2.35.1.723.g4982287a31-goog
Re: [PATCH] hw/nvram: Add at24c-eeprom support for small eeproms
Posted by Patrick Venture 2 years, 1 month ago 
On Mon, Mar 14, 2022 at 2:12 PM Patrick Venture <venture@google.com> wrote:

> Tested: Verified at24c02 driver happy and contents matched
> expectations.
>
> Signed-off-by: Patrick Venture <venture@google.com>
> Reviewed-by: Hao Wu <wuhaotsh@google.com>
> ---
>  hw/nvram/eeprom_at24c.c | 52 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
>  1 file changed, 35 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/hw/nvram/eeprom_at24c.c b/hw/nvram/eeprom_at24c.c
> index 01a3093600..abf9898f94 100644
> --- a/hw/nvram/eeprom_at24c.c
> +++ b/hw/nvram/eeprom_at24c.c
> @@ -45,6 +45,8 @@ struct EEPROMState {
>      bool changed;
>      /* during WRITE, # of address bytes transfered */
>      uint8_t haveaddr;
> +    /* whether it's 8-bit addressed or 16-bit */
> +    bool eightbit;
>
>      uint8_t *mem;
>
> @@ -85,7 +87,7 @@ uint8_t at24c_eeprom_recv(I2CSlave *s)
>      EEPROMState *ee = AT24C_EE(s);
>      uint8_t ret;
>
> -    if (ee->haveaddr == 1) {
> +    if (ee->haveaddr == 1 && !ee->eightbit) {
>          return 0xff;
>      }
>
> @@ -102,26 +104,35 @@ int at24c_eeprom_send(I2CSlave *s, uint8_t data)
>  {
>      EEPROMState *ee = AT24C_EE(s);
>
> -    if (ee->haveaddr < 2) {
> -        ee->cur <<= 8;
> -        ee->cur |= data;
> +    if (ee->haveaddr < 1) {
> +        ee->cur = data;
>          ee->haveaddr++;
> -        if (ee->haveaddr == 2) {
> -            ee->cur %= ee->rsize;
> +        if (ee->eightbit) {
>              DPRINTK("Set pointer %04x\n", ee->cur);
>          }
> +        return 0;
> +    } else if (ee->haveaddr < 2) {
> +        if (!ee->eightbit) {
> +            ee->cur <<= 8;
> +            ee->cur |= data;
> +            ee->haveaddr++;
> +            if (ee->haveaddr == 2) {
> +                ee->cur %= ee->rsize;
> +                DPRINTK("Set pointer %04x\n", ee->cur);
> +            }
>
> -    } else {
> -        if (ee->writable) {
> -            DPRINTK("Send %02x\n", data);
> -            ee->mem[ee->cur] = data;
> -            ee->changed = true;
> -        } else {
> -            DPRINTK("Send error %02x read-only\n", data);
> +            return 0;
>          }
> -        ee->cur = (ee->cur + 1u) % ee->rsize;
> +    }
>
> +    if (ee->writable) {
> +        DPRINTK("Send %02x\n", data);
> +        ee->mem[ee->cur] = data;
> +        ee->changed = true;
> +    } else {
> +        DPRINTK("Send error %02x read-only\n", data);
>      }
> +    ee->cur = (ee->cur + 1u) % ee->rsize;
>
>      return 0;
>  }
> @@ -131,12 +142,16 @@ static void at24c_eeprom_realize(DeviceState *dev,
> Error **errp)
>      EEPROMState *ee = AT24C_EE(dev);
>
>      if (ee->blk) {
> +        /* blk length is a minimum of 1 sector. */
>          int64_t len = blk_getlength(ee->blk);
>
>          if (len != ee->rsize) {
> -            error_setg(errp, "%s: Backing file size %" PRId64 " != %u",
> -                       TYPE_AT24C_EE, len, ee->rsize);
> -            return;
> +            /* for the at24c01 and at24c02, they are smaller than a
> sector. */
> +            if (ee->rsize >= BDRV_SECTOR_SIZE) {
> +                error_setg(errp, "%s: Backing file size %" PRId64 " !=
> %u",
> +                           TYPE_AT24C_EE, len, ee->rsize);
> +                return;
> +            }
>          }
>
>          if (blk_set_perm(ee->blk, BLK_PERM_CONSISTENT_READ |
> BLK_PERM_WRITE,
> @@ -148,6 +163,9 @@ static void at24c_eeprom_realize(DeviceState *dev,
> Error **errp)
>          }
>      }
>
> +    if (ee->rsize < 512) {
> +        ee->eightbit = true;
> +    }
>

Why 512?  The eeprom sizes for the parts seem to grow exponentially, so c01
is 128, then c02 is 256, then 512.  So I check for the two smaller
effectively.  Might warrant a comment.


>      ee->mem = g_malloc0(ee->rsize);
>  }
>
> --
> 2.35.1.723.g4982287a31-goog
>
>

Patchew 2.1-devel-0870f84

© 2016 - 2024 Red Hat, Inc.