include/block/block.h | 3 ++- block/io.c | 4 ++++ block/preallocate.c | 15 ++++++++++++--- 3 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
There is a bug in handling BDRV_REQ_NO_WAIT flag: we still may wait in
wait_serialising_requests() if request is unaligned. And this is
possible for the only user of this flag (preallocate filter) if
underlying file is unaligned to its request_alignment on start.
So, we have to fix preallocate filter to do only aligned preallocate
requests.
Next, we should fix generic block/io.c somehow. Keeping in mind that
preallocate is the only user of BDRV_REQ_NO_WAIT and that we have to
fix its behavior now, it seems more safe to just assert that we never
use BDRV_REQ_NO_WAIT with unaligned requests and add corresponding
comment. Let's do so.
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Reviewed-by: Denis V. Lunev <den@openvz.org>
---
include/block/block.h | 3 ++-
block/io.c | 4 ++++
block/preallocate.c | 15 ++++++++++++---
3 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/block/block.h b/include/block/block.h
index e1713ee306..f73203af4a 100644
--- a/include/block/block.h
+++ b/include/block/block.h
@@ -83,7 +83,8 @@ typedef enum {
/*
* If we need to wait for other requests, just fail immediately. Used
- * only together with BDRV_REQ_SERIALISING.
+ * only together with BDRV_REQ_SERIALISING. Used only with requests aligned
+ * to request_alignment (corresponding assertions are in block/io.c).
*/
BDRV_REQ_NO_WAIT = 0x400,
diff --git a/block/io.c b/block/io.c
index 4e4cb556c5..eb562a1cb8 100644
--- a/block/io.c
+++ b/block/io.c
@@ -2173,6 +2173,7 @@ static int coroutine_fn bdrv_co_do_zero_pwritev(BdrvChild *child,
padding = bdrv_init_padding(bs, offset, bytes, &pad);
if (padding) {
+ assert(!(flags & BDRV_REQ_NO_WAIT));
bdrv_make_request_serialising(req, align);
bdrv_padding_rmw_read(child, req, &pad, true);
@@ -2307,6 +2308,7 @@ int coroutine_fn bdrv_co_pwritev_part(BdrvChild *child,
* serialize the request to prevent interactions of the
* widened region with other transactions.
*/
+ assert(!(flags & BDRV_REQ_NO_WAIT));
bdrv_make_request_serialising(&req, align);
bdrv_padding_rmw_read(child, &req, &pad, false);
}
@@ -3328,6 +3330,8 @@ static int coroutine_fn bdrv_co_copy_range_internal(
/* TODO We can support BDRV_REQ_NO_FALLBACK here */
assert(!(read_flags & BDRV_REQ_NO_FALLBACK));
assert(!(write_flags & BDRV_REQ_NO_FALLBACK));
+ assert(!(read_flags & BDRV_REQ_NO_WAIT));
+ assert(!(write_flags & BDRV_REQ_NO_WAIT));
if (!dst || !dst->bs || !bdrv_is_inserted(dst->bs)) {
return -ENOMEDIUM;
diff --git a/block/preallocate.c b/block/preallocate.c
index 1d4233f730..e15cb8c74a 100644
--- a/block/preallocate.c
+++ b/block/preallocate.c
@@ -276,6 +276,10 @@ static bool coroutine_fn handle_write(BlockDriverState *bs, int64_t offset,
int64_t end = offset + bytes;
int64_t prealloc_start, prealloc_end;
int ret;
+ uint32_t file_align = bs->file->bs->bl.request_alignment;
+ uint32_t prealloc_align = MAX(s->opts.prealloc_align, file_align);
+
+ assert(QEMU_IS_ALIGNED(prealloc_align, file_align));
if (!has_prealloc_perms(bs)) {
/* We don't have state neither should try to recover it */
@@ -320,9 +324,14 @@ static bool coroutine_fn handle_write(BlockDriverState *bs, int64_t offset,
/* Now we want new preallocation, as request writes beyond s->file_end. */
- prealloc_start = want_merge_zero ? MIN(offset, s->file_end) : s->file_end;
- prealloc_end = QEMU_ALIGN_UP(end + s->opts.prealloc_size,
- s->opts.prealloc_align);
+ prealloc_start = QEMU_ALIGN_UP(
+ want_merge_zero ? MIN(offset, s->file_end) : s->file_end,
+ file_align);
+ prealloc_end = QEMU_ALIGN_UP(
+ MAX(prealloc_start, end) + s->opts.prealloc_size,
+ prealloc_align);
+
+ want_merge_zero = want_merge_zero && (prealloc_start <= offset);
ret = bdrv_co_pwrite_zeroes(
bs->file, prealloc_start, prealloc_end - prealloc_start,
--
2.31.1
On 15.02.22 13:16, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote: > There is a bug in handling BDRV_REQ_NO_WAIT flag: we still may wait in > wait_serialising_requests() if request is unaligned. And this is > possible for the only user of this flag (preallocate filter) if > underlying file is unaligned to its request_alignment on start. > > So, we have to fix preallocate filter to do only aligned preallocate > requests. > > Next, we should fix generic block/io.c somehow. Keeping in mind that > preallocate is the only user of BDRV_REQ_NO_WAIT and that we have to > fix its behavior now, it seems more safe to just assert that we never > use BDRV_REQ_NO_WAIT with unaligned requests and add corresponding > comment. Let's do so. > > Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com> > Reviewed-by: Denis V. Lunev <den@openvz.org> > --- > include/block/block.h | 3 ++- > block/io.c | 4 ++++ > block/preallocate.c | 15 ++++++++++++--- > 3 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) Thanks, applied to my block branch: https://gitlab.com/hreitz/qemu/-/commits/block
© 2016 - 2024 Red Hat, Inc.