On 04/02/2022 08.51, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> On 4/2/22 08:37, Thomas Huth wrote:
>> On 03/02/2022 20.17, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
>>> Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
>>> Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org>
>>> ---
>>> accel/meson.build | 12 +++++++-----
>>> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/accel/meson.build b/accel/meson.build
>>> index dfd808d2c8..b9a963cf80 100644
>>> --- a/accel/meson.build
>>> +++ b/accel/meson.build
>>> @@ -2,12 +2,14 @@ specific_ss.add(files('accel-common.c'))
>>> softmmu_ss.add(files('accel-softmmu.c'))
>>> user_ss.add(files('accel-user.c'))
>>> -subdir('hvf')
>>> -subdir('qtest')
>>> -subdir('kvm')
>>> subdir('tcg')
>>> -subdir('xen')
>>> -subdir('stubs')
>>> +if have_system
>>> + subdir('hvf')
>>> + subdir('qtest')
>>> + subdir('kvm')
>>> + subdir('xen')
>>> + subdir('stubs')
>>
>> Doesn't this render your first patch useless?
>
> No, we don't want to build non-TCG stubs in user-mode ;)
Ah, well, looking at this twice, I think it's ok, indeed. I was confused by
the fact that "have_system" and the "CONFIG_SOFTMMU" from patch 01 can have
two different meanings if the QEMU build has been configured with both,
softmmu and user targets. So never mind, please!
Thomas