Move the EXCP_ATOMIC case to match linux-user/arm/cpu_loop.c:cpu_loop
ordering.

Signed-off-by: Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com>
---
 bsd-user/arm/target_arch_cpu.h | 6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/bsd-user/arm/target_arch_cpu.h b/bsd-user/arm/target_arch_cpu.h
index c675419c30a..c526fc73502 100644
--- a/bsd-user/arm/target_arch_cpu.h
+++ b/bsd-user/arm/target_arch_cpu.h
@@ -180,12 +180,12 @@ static inline void target_cpu_loop(CPUARMState *env)
                 queue_signal(env, info.si_signo, &info);
             }
             break;
-        case EXCP_ATOMIC:
-            cpu_exec_step_atomic(cs);
-            break;
         case EXCP_YIELD:
             /* nothing to do here for user-mode, just resume guest code */
             break;
+        case EXCP_ATOMIC:
+            cpu_exec_step_atomic(cs);
+            break;
         default:
             fprintf(stderr, "qemu: unhandled CPU exception 0x%x - aborting\n",
                     trapnr);
-- 
2.33.1

On Sun, 9 Jan 2022 at 16:23, Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com> wrote:
>
> Move the EXCP_ATOMIC case to match linux-user/arm/cpu_loop.c:cpu_loop
> ordering.
>
> Signed-off-by: Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com>
> ---
>  bsd-user/arm/target_arch_cpu.h | 6 +++---
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>

Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>

thanks
-- PMM

On 1/10/22 3:18 AM, Warner Losh wrote:
> Move the EXCP_ATOMIC case to match linux-user/arm/cpu_loop.c:cpu_loop
> ordering.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Warner Losh<imp@bsdimp.com>
> ---
>   bsd-user/arm/target_arch_cpu.h | 6 +++---
>   1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>

r~