It's obvious that PDMA support 64-bit access of 64-bit registers, and
in previous commit, we confirm that PDMA support 32-bit access of both
32/64-bit registers. Thus, we configure 32/64-bit memory access of
PDMA registers as valid in general.
Signed-off-by: Jim Shu <jim.shu@sifive.com>
Reviewed-by: Frank Chang <frank.chang@sifive.com>
---
hw/dma/sifive_pdma.c | 4 ++++
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
diff --git a/hw/dma/sifive_pdma.c b/hw/dma/sifive_pdma.c
index b8b198ab4e..731fcdcf89 100644
--- a/hw/dma/sifive_pdma.c
+++ b/hw/dma/sifive_pdma.c
@@ -441,6 +441,10 @@ static const MemoryRegionOps sifive_pdma_ops = {
.impl = {
.min_access_size = 4,
.max_access_size = 8,
+ },
+ .valid = {
+ .min_access_size = 4,
+ .max_access_size = 8,
}
};
--
2.25.1
On 12/28/21 01:52, Jim Shu wrote:
> It's obvious that PDMA support 64-bit access of 64-bit registers, and
> in previous commit, we confirm that PDMA support 32-bit access of both
> 32/64-bit registers. Thus, we configure 32/64-bit memory access of
> PDMA registers as valid in general.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jim Shu <jim.shu@sifive.com>
> Reviewed-by: Frank Chang <frank.chang@sifive.com>
> ---
> hw/dma/sifive_pdma.c | 4 ++++
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/hw/dma/sifive_pdma.c b/hw/dma/sifive_pdma.c
> index b8b198ab4e..731fcdcf89 100644
> --- a/hw/dma/sifive_pdma.c
> +++ b/hw/dma/sifive_pdma.c
> @@ -441,6 +441,10 @@ static const MemoryRegionOps sifive_pdma_ops = {
> .impl = {
> .min_access_size = 4,
> .max_access_size = 8,
> + },
> + .valid = {
> + .min_access_size = 4,
> + .max_access_size = 8,
> }
> };
>
Eh now I see this patch. It is correct, so:
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
But I think the previous patch could be simpler.
On Tue, Dec 28, 2021 at 10:54 AM Jim Shu <jim.shu@sifive.com> wrote:
>
> It's obvious that PDMA support 64-bit access of 64-bit registers, and
> in previous commit, we confirm that PDMA support 32-bit access of both
> 32/64-bit registers. Thus, we configure 32/64-bit memory access of
> PDMA registers as valid in general.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jim Shu <jim.shu@sifive.com>
> Reviewed-by: Frank Chang <frank.chang@sifive.com>
Reviewed-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
Alistair
> ---
> hw/dma/sifive_pdma.c | 4 ++++
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/hw/dma/sifive_pdma.c b/hw/dma/sifive_pdma.c
> index b8b198ab4e..731fcdcf89 100644
> --- a/hw/dma/sifive_pdma.c
> +++ b/hw/dma/sifive_pdma.c
> @@ -441,6 +441,10 @@ static const MemoryRegionOps sifive_pdma_ops = {
> .impl = {
> .min_access_size = 4,
> .max_access_size = 8,
> + },
> + .valid = {
> + .min_access_size = 4,
> + .max_access_size = 8,
> }
> };
>
> --
> 2.25.1
>
>
On Tue, Dec 28, 2021 at 8:53 AM Jim Shu <jim.shu@sifive.com> wrote:
>
> It's obvious that PDMA support 64-bit access of 64-bit registers, and
%s/support/supports
> in previous commit, we confirm that PDMA support 32-bit access of both
%s/support/supports
> 32/64-bit registers. Thus, we configure 32/64-bit memory access of
> PDMA registers as valid in general.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jim Shu <jim.shu@sifive.com>
> Reviewed-by: Frank Chang <frank.chang@sifive.com>
> ---
> hw/dma/sifive_pdma.c | 4 ++++
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/hw/dma/sifive_pdma.c b/hw/dma/sifive_pdma.c
> index b8b198ab4e..731fcdcf89 100644
> --- a/hw/dma/sifive_pdma.c
> +++ b/hw/dma/sifive_pdma.c
> @@ -441,6 +441,10 @@ static const MemoryRegionOps sifive_pdma_ops = {
> .impl = {
> .min_access_size = 4,
> .max_access_size = 8,
> + },
> + .valid = {
> + .min_access_size = 4,
> + .max_access_size = 8,
> }
> };
>
Otherwise,
Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>
© 2016 - 2026 Red Hat, Inc.