Adapt the fields offset in the board information for Linux. Since
Linux relies on the CPU frequency value, I wonder how it ever worked.

Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Message-Id: <20211206103712.1866296-15-clg@kaod.org>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
---
 hw/ppc/ppc405_uc.c | 9 +++++----
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/hw/ppc/ppc405_uc.c b/hw/ppc/ppc405_uc.c
index 2a1e2d71b08b..ec97b22bd019 100644
--- a/hw/ppc/ppc405_uc.c
+++ b/hw/ppc/ppc405_uc.c
@@ -102,12 +102,13 @@ static ram_addr_t __ppc405_set_bootinfo(CPUPPCState *env, ppc4xx_bd_info_t *bd)
     for (i = 0; i < 32; i++) {
         stb_phys(cs->as, bdloc + 0x3C + i, bd->bi_r_version[i]);
     }
-    stl_be_phys(cs->as, bdloc + 0x5C, bd->bi_plb_busfreq);
-    stl_be_phys(cs->as, bdloc + 0x60, bd->bi_pci_busfreq);
+    stl_be_phys(cs->as, bdloc + 0x5C, bd->bi_procfreq);
+    stl_be_phys(cs->as, bdloc + 0x60, bd->bi_plb_busfreq);
+    stl_be_phys(cs->as, bdloc + 0x64, bd->bi_pci_busfreq);
     for (i = 0; i < 6; i++) {
-        stb_phys(cs->as, bdloc + 0x64 + i, bd->bi_pci_enetaddr[i]);
+        stb_phys(cs->as, bdloc + 0x68 + i, bd->bi_pci_enetaddr[i]);
     }
-    n = 0x6A;
+    n = 0x70; /* includes 2 bytes hole */
     for (i = 0; i < 6; i++) {
         stb_phys(cs->as, bdloc + n++, bd->bi_pci_enetaddr2[i]);
     }
-- 
2.31.1