[PATCH v5 07/18] target/riscv: setup everything so that riscv128-softmmu compiles

Frédéric Pétrot posted 18 patches 4 years, 2 months ago
There is a newer version of this series
[PATCH v5 07/18] target/riscv: setup everything so that riscv128-softmmu compiles
Posted by Frédéric Pétrot 4 years, 2 months ago
This patch is kind of a mess because several files have to be slightly
modified to allow for a new target. In the current status, we have done
our best to have RV64 and RV128 under the same RV64 umbrella, but there
is still work to do to have a single executable for both.
In particular, we have no atomic accesses for aligned 128-bit addresses.

Once this patch applied, adding risc128-sofmmu to --target-list produces
a (no so useful yet) executable.

Signed-off-by: Frédéric Pétrot <frederic.petrot@univ-grenoble-alpes.fr>
Co-authored-by: Fabien Portas <fabien.portas@grenoble-inp.org>
---
 configs/devices/riscv128-softmmu/default.mak | 17 +++++++++++++++
 configs/targets/riscv128-softmmu.mak         |  6 ++++++
 include/disas/dis-asm.h                      |  1 +
 include/hw/riscv/sifive_cpu.h                |  3 +++
 target/riscv/cpu-param.h                     |  5 +++++
 target/riscv/cpu.h                           |  3 +++
 disas/riscv.c                                |  5 +++++
 target/riscv/cpu.c                           | 22 ++++++++++++++++++--
 target/riscv/gdbstub.c                       |  8 +++++++
 target/riscv/insn_trans/trans_rvd.c.inc      | 12 +++++------
 target/riscv/insn_trans/trans_rvf.c.inc      |  6 +++---
 target/riscv/Kconfig                         |  3 +++
 12 files changed, 80 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 configs/devices/riscv128-softmmu/default.mak
 create mode 100644 configs/targets/riscv128-softmmu.mak

diff --git a/configs/devices/riscv128-softmmu/default.mak b/configs/devices/riscv128-softmmu/default.mak
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..e838f35785
--- /dev/null
+++ b/configs/devices/riscv128-softmmu/default.mak
@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
+# Default configuration for riscv128-softmmu
+
+# Uncomment the following lines to disable these optional devices:
+#
+#CONFIG_PCI_DEVICES=n
+# No does not seem to be an option for these two parameters
+CONFIG_SEMIHOSTING=y
+CONFIG_ARM_COMPATIBLE_SEMIHOSTING=y
+
+# Boards:
+#
+CONFIG_SPIKE=n
+CONFIG_SIFIVE_E=n
+CONFIG_SIFIVE_U=n
+CONFIG_RISCV_VIRT=y
+CONFIG_MICROCHIP_PFSOC=n
+CONFIG_SHAKTI_C=n
diff --git a/configs/targets/riscv128-softmmu.mak b/configs/targets/riscv128-softmmu.mak
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..d812cc1c80
--- /dev/null
+++ b/configs/targets/riscv128-softmmu.mak
@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+TARGET_ARCH=riscv128
+TARGET_BASE_ARCH=riscv
+# As long as we have no atomic accesses for aligned 128-bit addresses
+TARGET_SUPPORTS_MTTCG=n
+TARGET_XML_FILES=gdb-xml/riscv-64bit-cpu.xml gdb-xml/riscv-32bit-fpu.xml gdb-xml/riscv-64bit-fpu.xml gdb-xml/riscv-64bit-virtual.xml
+TARGET_NEED_FDT=y
diff --git a/include/disas/dis-asm.h b/include/disas/dis-asm.h
index 08e1beec85..102a1e7f50 100644
--- a/include/disas/dis-asm.h
+++ b/include/disas/dis-asm.h
@@ -459,6 +459,7 @@ int print_insn_nios2(bfd_vma, disassemble_info*);
 int print_insn_xtensa           (bfd_vma, disassemble_info*);
 int print_insn_riscv32          (bfd_vma, disassemble_info*);
 int print_insn_riscv64          (bfd_vma, disassemble_info*);
+int print_insn_riscv128         (bfd_vma, disassemble_info*);
 int print_insn_rx(bfd_vma, disassemble_info *);
 int print_insn_hexagon(bfd_vma, disassemble_info *);
 
diff --git a/include/hw/riscv/sifive_cpu.h b/include/hw/riscv/sifive_cpu.h
index 136799633a..64078feba8 100644
--- a/include/hw/riscv/sifive_cpu.h
+++ b/include/hw/riscv/sifive_cpu.h
@@ -26,6 +26,9 @@
 #elif defined(TARGET_RISCV64)
 #define SIFIVE_E_CPU TYPE_RISCV_CPU_SIFIVE_E51
 #define SIFIVE_U_CPU TYPE_RISCV_CPU_SIFIVE_U54
+#else
+#define SIFIVE_E_CPU TYPE_RISCV_CPU_SIFIVE_E51
+#define SIFIVE_U_CPU TYPE_RISCV_CPU_SIFIVE_U54
 #endif
 
 #endif /* HW_SIFIVE_CPU_H */
diff --git a/target/riscv/cpu-param.h b/target/riscv/cpu-param.h
index 80eb615f93..c10459b56f 100644
--- a/target/riscv/cpu-param.h
+++ b/target/riscv/cpu-param.h
@@ -16,6 +16,11 @@
 # define TARGET_LONG_BITS 32
 # define TARGET_PHYS_ADDR_SPACE_BITS 34 /* 22-bit PPN */
 # define TARGET_VIRT_ADDR_SPACE_BITS 32 /* sv32 */
+#else
+/* 64-bit target, since QEMU isn't built to have TARGET_LONG_BITS over 64 */
+# define TARGET_LONG_BITS 64
+# define TARGET_PHYS_ADDR_SPACE_BITS 56 /* 44-bit PPN */
+# define TARGET_VIRT_ADDR_SPACE_BITS 48 /* sv48 */
 #endif
 #define TARGET_PAGE_BITS 12 /* 4 KiB Pages */
 /*
diff --git a/target/riscv/cpu.h b/target/riscv/cpu.h
index 53a295efb7..8ff5b08d15 100644
--- a/target/riscv/cpu.h
+++ b/target/riscv/cpu.h
@@ -38,6 +38,7 @@
 #define TYPE_RISCV_CPU_ANY              RISCV_CPU_TYPE_NAME("any")
 #define TYPE_RISCV_CPU_BASE32           RISCV_CPU_TYPE_NAME("rv32")
 #define TYPE_RISCV_CPU_BASE64           RISCV_CPU_TYPE_NAME("rv64")
+#define TYPE_RISCV_CPU_BASE128          RISCV_CPU_TYPE_NAME("rv128")
 #define TYPE_RISCV_CPU_IBEX             RISCV_CPU_TYPE_NAME("lowrisc-ibex")
 #define TYPE_RISCV_CPU_SHAKTI_C         RISCV_CPU_TYPE_NAME("shakti-c")
 #define TYPE_RISCV_CPU_SIFIVE_E31       RISCV_CPU_TYPE_NAME("sifive-e31")
@@ -50,6 +51,8 @@
 # define TYPE_RISCV_CPU_BASE            TYPE_RISCV_CPU_BASE32
 #elif defined(TARGET_RISCV64)
 # define TYPE_RISCV_CPU_BASE            TYPE_RISCV_CPU_BASE64
+#else
+# define TYPE_RISCV_CPU_BASE            TYPE_RISCV_CPU_BASE128
 #endif
 
 #define RV(x) ((target_ulong)1 << (x - 'A'))
diff --git a/disas/riscv.c b/disas/riscv.c
index 793ad14c27..03c8dc9961 100644
--- a/disas/riscv.c
+++ b/disas/riscv.c
@@ -3090,3 +3090,8 @@ int print_insn_riscv64(bfd_vma memaddr, struct disassemble_info *info)
 {
     return print_insn_riscv(memaddr, info, rv64);
 }
+
+int print_insn_riscv128(bfd_vma memaddr, struct disassemble_info *info)
+{
+    return print_insn_riscv(memaddr, info, rv128);
+}
diff --git a/target/riscv/cpu.c b/target/riscv/cpu.c
index 364140f5ff..292c916f46 100644
--- a/target/riscv/cpu.c
+++ b/target/riscv/cpu.c
@@ -152,6 +152,8 @@ static void riscv_any_cpu_init(Object *obj)
     set_misa(env, MXL_RV32, RVI | RVM | RVA | RVF | RVD | RVC | RVU);
 #elif defined(TARGET_RISCV64)
     set_misa(env, MXL_RV64, RVI | RVM | RVA | RVF | RVD | RVC | RVU);
+#else
+    set_misa(env, MXL_RV128, RVI | RVM | RVA | RVF | RVD | RVC | RVU);
 #endif
     set_priv_version(env, PRIV_VERSION_1_11_0);
 }
@@ -178,7 +180,7 @@ static void rv64_sifive_e_cpu_init(Object *obj)
     set_priv_version(env, PRIV_VERSION_1_10_0);
     qdev_prop_set_bit(DEVICE(obj), "mmu", false);
 }
-#else
+#elif defined(TARGET_RISCV32)
 static void rv32_base_cpu_init(Object *obj)
 {
     CPURISCVState *env = &RISCV_CPU(obj)->env;
@@ -218,6 +220,13 @@ static void rv32_imafcu_nommu_cpu_init(Object *obj)
     set_resetvec(env, DEFAULT_RSTVEC);
     qdev_prop_set_bit(DEVICE(obj), "mmu", false);
 }
+#else
+static void rv128_base_cpu_init(Object *obj)
+{
+    CPURISCVState *env = &RISCV_CPU(obj)->env;
+    /* We set this in the realise function */
+    set_misa(env, MXL_RV128, 0);
+}
 #endif
 
 static ObjectClass *riscv_cpu_class_by_name(const char *cpu_model)
@@ -402,6 +411,9 @@ static void riscv_cpu_disas_set_info(CPUState *s, disassemble_info *info)
     case MXL_RV64:
         info->print_insn = print_insn_riscv64;
         break;
+    case MXL_RV128:
+        info->print_insn = print_insn_riscv128;
+        break;
     default:
         g_assert_not_reached();
     }
@@ -464,6 +476,9 @@ static void riscv_cpu_realize(DeviceState *dev, Error **errp)
 #ifdef TARGET_RISCV64
     case MXL_RV64:
         break;
+#elif !defined(TARGET_RISCV32)
+    case MXL_RV128:
+        break;
 #endif
     case MXL_RV32:
         break;
@@ -670,6 +685,7 @@ static gchar *riscv_gdb_arch_name(CPUState *cs)
     case MXL_RV32:
         return g_strdup("riscv:rv32");
     case MXL_RV64:
+    case MXL_RV128:
         return g_strdup("riscv:rv64");
     default:
         g_assert_not_reached();
@@ -733,7 +749,7 @@ static void riscv_cpu_class_init(ObjectClass *c, void *data)
     cc->gdb_num_core_regs = 33;
 #if defined(TARGET_RISCV32)
     cc->gdb_core_xml_file = "riscv-32bit-cpu.xml";
-#elif defined(TARGET_RISCV64)
+#else
     cc->gdb_core_xml_file = "riscv-64bit-cpu.xml";
 #endif
     cc->gdb_stop_before_watchpoint = true;
@@ -822,6 +838,8 @@ static const TypeInfo riscv_cpu_type_infos[] = {
     DEFINE_CPU(TYPE_RISCV_CPU_SIFIVE_E51,       rv64_sifive_e_cpu_init),
     DEFINE_CPU(TYPE_RISCV_CPU_SIFIVE_U54,       rv64_sifive_u_cpu_init),
     DEFINE_CPU(TYPE_RISCV_CPU_SHAKTI_C,         rv64_sifive_u_cpu_init),
+#else
+    DEFINE_CPU(TYPE_RISCV_CPU_BASE128,          rv128_base_cpu_init),
 #endif
 };
 
diff --git a/target/riscv/gdbstub.c b/target/riscv/gdbstub.c
index 23429179e2..7672ae123f 100644
--- a/target/riscv/gdbstub.c
+++ b/target/riscv/gdbstub.c
@@ -164,6 +164,11 @@ static int riscv_gen_dynamic_csr_xml(CPUState *cs, int base_reg)
     int bitsize = 16 << env->misa_mxl_max;
     int i;
 
+    /* Until gdb knows about 128-bit registers */
+    if (bitsize > 64) {
+        bitsize = 64;
+    }
+
     g_string_printf(s, "<?xml version=\"1.0\"?>");
     g_string_append_printf(s, "<!DOCTYPE feature SYSTEM \"gdb-target.dtd\">");
     g_string_append_printf(s, "<feature name=\"org.gnu.gdb.riscv.csr\">");
@@ -204,6 +209,9 @@ void riscv_cpu_register_gdb_regs_for_features(CPUState *cs)
 #elif defined(TARGET_RISCV64)
     gdb_register_coprocessor(cs, riscv_gdb_get_virtual, riscv_gdb_set_virtual,
                              1, "riscv-64bit-virtual.xml", 0);
+#else
+    gdb_register_coprocessor(cs, riscv_gdb_get_virtual, riscv_gdb_set_virtual,
+                             1, "riscv-64bit-virtual.xml", 0);
 #endif
 
     gdb_register_coprocessor(cs, riscv_gdb_get_csr, riscv_gdb_set_csr,
diff --git a/target/riscv/insn_trans/trans_rvd.c.inc b/target/riscv/insn_trans/trans_rvd.c.inc
index ed444b042a..c8848bf300 100644
--- a/target/riscv/insn_trans/trans_rvd.c.inc
+++ b/target/riscv/insn_trans/trans_rvd.c.inc
@@ -395,11 +395,11 @@ static bool trans_fmv_x_d(DisasContext *ctx, arg_fmv_x_d *a)
     REQUIRE_FPU;
     REQUIRE_EXT(ctx, RVD);
 
-#ifdef TARGET_RISCV64
+#ifdef TARGET_RISCV32
+    qemu_build_not_reached();
+#else
     gen_set_gpr(ctx, a->rd, cpu_fpr[a->rs1]);
     return true;
-#else
-    qemu_build_not_reached();
 #endif
 }
 
@@ -439,11 +439,11 @@ static bool trans_fmv_d_x(DisasContext *ctx, arg_fmv_d_x *a)
     REQUIRE_FPU;
     REQUIRE_EXT(ctx, RVD);
 
-#ifdef TARGET_RISCV64
+#ifdef TARGET_RISCV32
+    qemu_build_not_reached();
+#else
     tcg_gen_mov_tl(cpu_fpr[a->rd], get_gpr(ctx, a->rs1, EXT_NONE));
     mark_fs_dirty(ctx);
     return true;
-#else
-    qemu_build_not_reached();
 #endif
 }
diff --git a/target/riscv/insn_trans/trans_rvf.c.inc b/target/riscv/insn_trans/trans_rvf.c.inc
index b5459249c4..fa4681fb21 100644
--- a/target/riscv/insn_trans/trans_rvf.c.inc
+++ b/target/riscv/insn_trans/trans_rvf.c.inc
@@ -313,10 +313,10 @@ static bool trans_fmv_x_w(DisasContext *ctx, arg_fmv_x_w *a)
 
     TCGv dest = dest_gpr(ctx, a->rd);
 
-#if defined(TARGET_RISCV64)
-    tcg_gen_ext32s_tl(dest, cpu_fpr[a->rs1]);
-#else
+#if defined(TARGET_RISCV32)
     tcg_gen_extrl_i64_i32(dest, cpu_fpr[a->rs1]);
+#else
+    tcg_gen_ext32s_tl(dest, cpu_fpr[a->rs1]);
 #endif
 
     gen_set_gpr(ctx, a->rd, dest);
diff --git a/target/riscv/Kconfig b/target/riscv/Kconfig
index b9e5932f13..f9ea52a59a 100644
--- a/target/riscv/Kconfig
+++ b/target/riscv/Kconfig
@@ -3,3 +3,6 @@ config RISCV32
 
 config RISCV64
     bool
+
+config RISCV128
+    bool
-- 
2.33.1


Re: [PATCH v5 07/18] target/riscv: setup everything so that riscv128-softmmu compiles
Posted by Alistair Francis 4 years, 2 months ago
On Sat, Nov 13, 2021 at 1:16 AM Frédéric Pétrot
<frederic.petrot@univ-grenoble-alpes.fr> wrote:
>
> This patch is kind of a mess because several files have to be slightly
> modified to allow for a new target. In the current status, we have done
> our best to have RV64 and RV128 under the same RV64 umbrella, but there
> is still work to do to have a single executable for both.
> In particular, we have no atomic accesses for aligned 128-bit addresses.
>
> Once this patch applied, adding risc128-sofmmu to --target-list produces
> a (no so useful yet) executable.

I can't remember if we discussed this before, but do we need the
riscv128-sofmmu executable? Can we instead just use a riscv64-sofmmu
executable?

Alistair

>
> Signed-off-by: Frédéric Pétrot <frederic.petrot@univ-grenoble-alpes.fr>
> Co-authored-by: Fabien Portas <fabien.portas@grenoble-inp.org>
> ---
>  configs/devices/riscv128-softmmu/default.mak | 17 +++++++++++++++
>  configs/targets/riscv128-softmmu.mak         |  6 ++++++
>  include/disas/dis-asm.h                      |  1 +
>  include/hw/riscv/sifive_cpu.h                |  3 +++
>  target/riscv/cpu-param.h                     |  5 +++++
>  target/riscv/cpu.h                           |  3 +++
>  disas/riscv.c                                |  5 +++++
>  target/riscv/cpu.c                           | 22 ++++++++++++++++++--
>  target/riscv/gdbstub.c                       |  8 +++++++
>  target/riscv/insn_trans/trans_rvd.c.inc      | 12 +++++------
>  target/riscv/insn_trans/trans_rvf.c.inc      |  6 +++---
>  target/riscv/Kconfig                         |  3 +++
>  12 files changed, 80 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>  create mode 100644 configs/devices/riscv128-softmmu/default.mak
>  create mode 100644 configs/targets/riscv128-softmmu.mak
>
> diff --git a/configs/devices/riscv128-softmmu/default.mak b/configs/devices/riscv128-softmmu/default.mak
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000000..e838f35785
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/configs/devices/riscv128-softmmu/default.mak
> @@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
> +# Default configuration for riscv128-softmmu
> +
> +# Uncomment the following lines to disable these optional devices:
> +#
> +#CONFIG_PCI_DEVICES=n
> +# No does not seem to be an option for these two parameters
> +CONFIG_SEMIHOSTING=y
> +CONFIG_ARM_COMPATIBLE_SEMIHOSTING=y
> +
> +# Boards:
> +#
> +CONFIG_SPIKE=n
> +CONFIG_SIFIVE_E=n
> +CONFIG_SIFIVE_U=n
> +CONFIG_RISCV_VIRT=y
> +CONFIG_MICROCHIP_PFSOC=n
> +CONFIG_SHAKTI_C=n
> diff --git a/configs/targets/riscv128-softmmu.mak b/configs/targets/riscv128-softmmu.mak
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000000..d812cc1c80
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/configs/targets/riscv128-softmmu.mak
> @@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
> +TARGET_ARCH=riscv128
> +TARGET_BASE_ARCH=riscv
> +# As long as we have no atomic accesses for aligned 128-bit addresses
> +TARGET_SUPPORTS_MTTCG=n
> +TARGET_XML_FILES=gdb-xml/riscv-64bit-cpu.xml gdb-xml/riscv-32bit-fpu.xml gdb-xml/riscv-64bit-fpu.xml gdb-xml/riscv-64bit-virtual.xml
> +TARGET_NEED_FDT=y
> diff --git a/include/disas/dis-asm.h b/include/disas/dis-asm.h
> index 08e1beec85..102a1e7f50 100644
> --- a/include/disas/dis-asm.h
> +++ b/include/disas/dis-asm.h
> @@ -459,6 +459,7 @@ int print_insn_nios2(bfd_vma, disassemble_info*);
>  int print_insn_xtensa           (bfd_vma, disassemble_info*);
>  int print_insn_riscv32          (bfd_vma, disassemble_info*);
>  int print_insn_riscv64          (bfd_vma, disassemble_info*);
> +int print_insn_riscv128         (bfd_vma, disassemble_info*);
>  int print_insn_rx(bfd_vma, disassemble_info *);
>  int print_insn_hexagon(bfd_vma, disassemble_info *);
>
> diff --git a/include/hw/riscv/sifive_cpu.h b/include/hw/riscv/sifive_cpu.h
> index 136799633a..64078feba8 100644
> --- a/include/hw/riscv/sifive_cpu.h
> +++ b/include/hw/riscv/sifive_cpu.h
> @@ -26,6 +26,9 @@
>  #elif defined(TARGET_RISCV64)
>  #define SIFIVE_E_CPU TYPE_RISCV_CPU_SIFIVE_E51
>  #define SIFIVE_U_CPU TYPE_RISCV_CPU_SIFIVE_U54
> +#else
> +#define SIFIVE_E_CPU TYPE_RISCV_CPU_SIFIVE_E51
> +#define SIFIVE_U_CPU TYPE_RISCV_CPU_SIFIVE_U54
>  #endif
>
>  #endif /* HW_SIFIVE_CPU_H */
> diff --git a/target/riscv/cpu-param.h b/target/riscv/cpu-param.h
> index 80eb615f93..c10459b56f 100644
> --- a/target/riscv/cpu-param.h
> +++ b/target/riscv/cpu-param.h
> @@ -16,6 +16,11 @@
>  # define TARGET_LONG_BITS 32
>  # define TARGET_PHYS_ADDR_SPACE_BITS 34 /* 22-bit PPN */
>  # define TARGET_VIRT_ADDR_SPACE_BITS 32 /* sv32 */
> +#else
> +/* 64-bit target, since QEMU isn't built to have TARGET_LONG_BITS over 64 */
> +# define TARGET_LONG_BITS 64
> +# define TARGET_PHYS_ADDR_SPACE_BITS 56 /* 44-bit PPN */
> +# define TARGET_VIRT_ADDR_SPACE_BITS 48 /* sv48 */
>  #endif
>  #define TARGET_PAGE_BITS 12 /* 4 KiB Pages */
>  /*
> diff --git a/target/riscv/cpu.h b/target/riscv/cpu.h
> index 53a295efb7..8ff5b08d15 100644
> --- a/target/riscv/cpu.h
> +++ b/target/riscv/cpu.h
> @@ -38,6 +38,7 @@
>  #define TYPE_RISCV_CPU_ANY              RISCV_CPU_TYPE_NAME("any")
>  #define TYPE_RISCV_CPU_BASE32           RISCV_CPU_TYPE_NAME("rv32")
>  #define TYPE_RISCV_CPU_BASE64           RISCV_CPU_TYPE_NAME("rv64")
> +#define TYPE_RISCV_CPU_BASE128          RISCV_CPU_TYPE_NAME("rv128")
>  #define TYPE_RISCV_CPU_IBEX             RISCV_CPU_TYPE_NAME("lowrisc-ibex")
>  #define TYPE_RISCV_CPU_SHAKTI_C         RISCV_CPU_TYPE_NAME("shakti-c")
>  #define TYPE_RISCV_CPU_SIFIVE_E31       RISCV_CPU_TYPE_NAME("sifive-e31")
> @@ -50,6 +51,8 @@
>  # define TYPE_RISCV_CPU_BASE            TYPE_RISCV_CPU_BASE32
>  #elif defined(TARGET_RISCV64)
>  # define TYPE_RISCV_CPU_BASE            TYPE_RISCV_CPU_BASE64
> +#else
> +# define TYPE_RISCV_CPU_BASE            TYPE_RISCV_CPU_BASE128
>  #endif
>
>  #define RV(x) ((target_ulong)1 << (x - 'A'))
> diff --git a/disas/riscv.c b/disas/riscv.c
> index 793ad14c27..03c8dc9961 100644
> --- a/disas/riscv.c
> +++ b/disas/riscv.c
> @@ -3090,3 +3090,8 @@ int print_insn_riscv64(bfd_vma memaddr, struct disassemble_info *info)
>  {
>      return print_insn_riscv(memaddr, info, rv64);
>  }
> +
> +int print_insn_riscv128(bfd_vma memaddr, struct disassemble_info *info)
> +{
> +    return print_insn_riscv(memaddr, info, rv128);
> +}
> diff --git a/target/riscv/cpu.c b/target/riscv/cpu.c
> index 364140f5ff..292c916f46 100644
> --- a/target/riscv/cpu.c
> +++ b/target/riscv/cpu.c
> @@ -152,6 +152,8 @@ static void riscv_any_cpu_init(Object *obj)
>      set_misa(env, MXL_RV32, RVI | RVM | RVA | RVF | RVD | RVC | RVU);
>  #elif defined(TARGET_RISCV64)
>      set_misa(env, MXL_RV64, RVI | RVM | RVA | RVF | RVD | RVC | RVU);
> +#else
> +    set_misa(env, MXL_RV128, RVI | RVM | RVA | RVF | RVD | RVC | RVU);
>  #endif
>      set_priv_version(env, PRIV_VERSION_1_11_0);
>  }
> @@ -178,7 +180,7 @@ static void rv64_sifive_e_cpu_init(Object *obj)
>      set_priv_version(env, PRIV_VERSION_1_10_0);
>      qdev_prop_set_bit(DEVICE(obj), "mmu", false);
>  }
> -#else
> +#elif defined(TARGET_RISCV32)
>  static void rv32_base_cpu_init(Object *obj)
>  {
>      CPURISCVState *env = &RISCV_CPU(obj)->env;
> @@ -218,6 +220,13 @@ static void rv32_imafcu_nommu_cpu_init(Object *obj)
>      set_resetvec(env, DEFAULT_RSTVEC);
>      qdev_prop_set_bit(DEVICE(obj), "mmu", false);
>  }
> +#else
> +static void rv128_base_cpu_init(Object *obj)
> +{
> +    CPURISCVState *env = &RISCV_CPU(obj)->env;
> +    /* We set this in the realise function */
> +    set_misa(env, MXL_RV128, 0);
> +}
>  #endif
>
>  static ObjectClass *riscv_cpu_class_by_name(const char *cpu_model)
> @@ -402,6 +411,9 @@ static void riscv_cpu_disas_set_info(CPUState *s, disassemble_info *info)
>      case MXL_RV64:
>          info->print_insn = print_insn_riscv64;
>          break;
> +    case MXL_RV128:
> +        info->print_insn = print_insn_riscv128;
> +        break;
>      default:
>          g_assert_not_reached();
>      }
> @@ -464,6 +476,9 @@ static void riscv_cpu_realize(DeviceState *dev, Error **errp)
>  #ifdef TARGET_RISCV64
>      case MXL_RV64:
>          break;
> +#elif !defined(TARGET_RISCV32)
> +    case MXL_RV128:
> +        break;
>  #endif
>      case MXL_RV32:
>          break;
> @@ -670,6 +685,7 @@ static gchar *riscv_gdb_arch_name(CPUState *cs)
>      case MXL_RV32:
>          return g_strdup("riscv:rv32");
>      case MXL_RV64:
> +    case MXL_RV128:
>          return g_strdup("riscv:rv64");
>      default:
>          g_assert_not_reached();
> @@ -733,7 +749,7 @@ static void riscv_cpu_class_init(ObjectClass *c, void *data)
>      cc->gdb_num_core_regs = 33;
>  #if defined(TARGET_RISCV32)
>      cc->gdb_core_xml_file = "riscv-32bit-cpu.xml";
> -#elif defined(TARGET_RISCV64)
> +#else
>      cc->gdb_core_xml_file = "riscv-64bit-cpu.xml";
>  #endif
>      cc->gdb_stop_before_watchpoint = true;
> @@ -822,6 +838,8 @@ static const TypeInfo riscv_cpu_type_infos[] = {
>      DEFINE_CPU(TYPE_RISCV_CPU_SIFIVE_E51,       rv64_sifive_e_cpu_init),
>      DEFINE_CPU(TYPE_RISCV_CPU_SIFIVE_U54,       rv64_sifive_u_cpu_init),
>      DEFINE_CPU(TYPE_RISCV_CPU_SHAKTI_C,         rv64_sifive_u_cpu_init),
> +#else
> +    DEFINE_CPU(TYPE_RISCV_CPU_BASE128,          rv128_base_cpu_init),
>  #endif
>  };
>
> diff --git a/target/riscv/gdbstub.c b/target/riscv/gdbstub.c
> index 23429179e2..7672ae123f 100644
> --- a/target/riscv/gdbstub.c
> +++ b/target/riscv/gdbstub.c
> @@ -164,6 +164,11 @@ static int riscv_gen_dynamic_csr_xml(CPUState *cs, int base_reg)
>      int bitsize = 16 << env->misa_mxl_max;
>      int i;
>
> +    /* Until gdb knows about 128-bit registers */
> +    if (bitsize > 64) {
> +        bitsize = 64;
> +    }
> +
>      g_string_printf(s, "<?xml version=\"1.0\"?>");
>      g_string_append_printf(s, "<!DOCTYPE feature SYSTEM \"gdb-target.dtd\">");
>      g_string_append_printf(s, "<feature name=\"org.gnu.gdb.riscv.csr\">");
> @@ -204,6 +209,9 @@ void riscv_cpu_register_gdb_regs_for_features(CPUState *cs)
>  #elif defined(TARGET_RISCV64)
>      gdb_register_coprocessor(cs, riscv_gdb_get_virtual, riscv_gdb_set_virtual,
>                               1, "riscv-64bit-virtual.xml", 0);
> +#else
> +    gdb_register_coprocessor(cs, riscv_gdb_get_virtual, riscv_gdb_set_virtual,
> +                             1, "riscv-64bit-virtual.xml", 0);
>  #endif
>
>      gdb_register_coprocessor(cs, riscv_gdb_get_csr, riscv_gdb_set_csr,
> diff --git a/target/riscv/insn_trans/trans_rvd.c.inc b/target/riscv/insn_trans/trans_rvd.c.inc
> index ed444b042a..c8848bf300 100644
> --- a/target/riscv/insn_trans/trans_rvd.c.inc
> +++ b/target/riscv/insn_trans/trans_rvd.c.inc
> @@ -395,11 +395,11 @@ static bool trans_fmv_x_d(DisasContext *ctx, arg_fmv_x_d *a)
>      REQUIRE_FPU;
>      REQUIRE_EXT(ctx, RVD);
>
> -#ifdef TARGET_RISCV64
> +#ifdef TARGET_RISCV32
> +    qemu_build_not_reached();
> +#else
>      gen_set_gpr(ctx, a->rd, cpu_fpr[a->rs1]);
>      return true;
> -#else
> -    qemu_build_not_reached();
>  #endif
>  }
>
> @@ -439,11 +439,11 @@ static bool trans_fmv_d_x(DisasContext *ctx, arg_fmv_d_x *a)
>      REQUIRE_FPU;
>      REQUIRE_EXT(ctx, RVD);
>
> -#ifdef TARGET_RISCV64
> +#ifdef TARGET_RISCV32
> +    qemu_build_not_reached();
> +#else
>      tcg_gen_mov_tl(cpu_fpr[a->rd], get_gpr(ctx, a->rs1, EXT_NONE));
>      mark_fs_dirty(ctx);
>      return true;
> -#else
> -    qemu_build_not_reached();
>  #endif
>  }
> diff --git a/target/riscv/insn_trans/trans_rvf.c.inc b/target/riscv/insn_trans/trans_rvf.c.inc
> index b5459249c4..fa4681fb21 100644
> --- a/target/riscv/insn_trans/trans_rvf.c.inc
> +++ b/target/riscv/insn_trans/trans_rvf.c.inc
> @@ -313,10 +313,10 @@ static bool trans_fmv_x_w(DisasContext *ctx, arg_fmv_x_w *a)
>
>      TCGv dest = dest_gpr(ctx, a->rd);
>
> -#if defined(TARGET_RISCV64)
> -    tcg_gen_ext32s_tl(dest, cpu_fpr[a->rs1]);
> -#else
> +#if defined(TARGET_RISCV32)
>      tcg_gen_extrl_i64_i32(dest, cpu_fpr[a->rs1]);
> +#else
> +    tcg_gen_ext32s_tl(dest, cpu_fpr[a->rs1]);
>  #endif
>
>      gen_set_gpr(ctx, a->rd, dest);
> diff --git a/target/riscv/Kconfig b/target/riscv/Kconfig
> index b9e5932f13..f9ea52a59a 100644
> --- a/target/riscv/Kconfig
> +++ b/target/riscv/Kconfig
> @@ -3,3 +3,6 @@ config RISCV32
>
>  config RISCV64
>      bool
> +
> +config RISCV128
> +    bool
> --
> 2.33.1
>
>

Re: [PATCH v5 07/18] target/riscv: setup everything so that riscv128-softmmu compiles
Posted by Frédéric Pétrot 4 years, 2 months ago
On 24/11/2021 07:12, Alistair Francis wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 13, 2021 at 1:16 AM Frédéric Pétrot
> <frederic.petrot@univ-grenoble-alpes.fr> wrote:
>>
>> This patch is kind of a mess because several files have to be slightly
>> modified to allow for a new target. In the current status, we have done
>> our best to have RV64 and RV128 under the same RV64 umbrella, but there
>> is still work to do to have a single executable for both.
>> In particular, we have no atomic accesses for aligned 128-bit addresses.
>>
>> Once this patch applied, adding risc128-sofmmu to --target-list produces
>> a (no so useful yet) executable.
> 
> I can't remember if we discussed this before, but do we need the
> riscv128-sofmmu executable? Can we instead just use a riscv64-sofmmu
> executable?

   Hello Alistair,
   Richard was also advocating for a single executable, but pointed out that
   we need to disable mttcg because there is a need for specific tcg support for
   128-bit aligned atomics.
   Given my understanding of that part of QEMU, I choose the easy way to disable
   it once and for all at compile time until we have that.

   Frédéric

> 
> Alistair
> 
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Frédéric Pétrot <frederic.petrot@univ-grenoble-alpes.fr>
>> Co-authored-by: Fabien Portas <fabien.portas@grenoble-inp.org>
>> ---
>>   configs/devices/riscv128-softmmu/default.mak | 17 +++++++++++++++
>>   configs/targets/riscv128-softmmu.mak         |  6 ++++++
>>   include/disas/dis-asm.h                      |  1 +
>>   include/hw/riscv/sifive_cpu.h                |  3 +++
>>   target/riscv/cpu-param.h                     |  5 +++++
>>   target/riscv/cpu.h                           |  3 +++
>>   disas/riscv.c                                |  5 +++++
>>   target/riscv/cpu.c                           | 22 ++++++++++++++++++--
>>   target/riscv/gdbstub.c                       |  8 +++++++
>>   target/riscv/insn_trans/trans_rvd.c.inc      | 12 +++++------
>>   target/riscv/insn_trans/trans_rvf.c.inc      |  6 +++---
>>   target/riscv/Kconfig                         |  3 +++
>>   12 files changed, 80 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>>   create mode 100644 configs/devices/riscv128-softmmu/default.mak
>>   create mode 100644 configs/targets/riscv128-softmmu.mak
>>
>> diff --git a/configs/devices/riscv128-softmmu/default.mak b/configs/devices/riscv128-softmmu/default.mak
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 0000000000..e838f35785
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/configs/devices/riscv128-softmmu/default.mak
>> @@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
>> +# Default configuration for riscv128-softmmu
>> +
>> +# Uncomment the following lines to disable these optional devices:
>> +#
>> +#CONFIG_PCI_DEVICES=n
>> +# No does not seem to be an option for these two parameters
>> +CONFIG_SEMIHOSTING=y
>> +CONFIG_ARM_COMPATIBLE_SEMIHOSTING=y
>> +
>> +# Boards:
>> +#
>> +CONFIG_SPIKE=n
>> +CONFIG_SIFIVE_E=n
>> +CONFIG_SIFIVE_U=n
>> +CONFIG_RISCV_VIRT=y
>> +CONFIG_MICROCHIP_PFSOC=n
>> +CONFIG_SHAKTI_C=n
>> diff --git a/configs/targets/riscv128-softmmu.mak b/configs/targets/riscv128-softmmu.mak
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 0000000000..d812cc1c80
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/configs/targets/riscv128-softmmu.mak
>> @@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
>> +TARGET_ARCH=riscv128
>> +TARGET_BASE_ARCH=riscv
>> +# As long as we have no atomic accesses for aligned 128-bit addresses
>> +TARGET_SUPPORTS_MTTCG=n
>> +TARGET_XML_FILES=gdb-xml/riscv-64bit-cpu.xml gdb-xml/riscv-32bit-fpu.xml gdb-xml/riscv-64bit-fpu.xml gdb-xml/riscv-64bit-virtual.xml
>> +TARGET_NEED_FDT=y
>> diff --git a/include/disas/dis-asm.h b/include/disas/dis-asm.h
>> index 08e1beec85..102a1e7f50 100644
>> --- a/include/disas/dis-asm.h
>> +++ b/include/disas/dis-asm.h
>> @@ -459,6 +459,7 @@ int print_insn_nios2(bfd_vma, disassemble_info*);
>>   int print_insn_xtensa           (bfd_vma, disassemble_info*);
>>   int print_insn_riscv32          (bfd_vma, disassemble_info*);
>>   int print_insn_riscv64          (bfd_vma, disassemble_info*);
>> +int print_insn_riscv128         (bfd_vma, disassemble_info*);
>>   int print_insn_rx(bfd_vma, disassemble_info *);
>>   int print_insn_hexagon(bfd_vma, disassemble_info *);
>>
>> diff --git a/include/hw/riscv/sifive_cpu.h b/include/hw/riscv/sifive_cpu.h
>> index 136799633a..64078feba8 100644
>> --- a/include/hw/riscv/sifive_cpu.h
>> +++ b/include/hw/riscv/sifive_cpu.h
>> @@ -26,6 +26,9 @@
>>   #elif defined(TARGET_RISCV64)
>>   #define SIFIVE_E_CPU TYPE_RISCV_CPU_SIFIVE_E51
>>   #define SIFIVE_U_CPU TYPE_RISCV_CPU_SIFIVE_U54
>> +#else
>> +#define SIFIVE_E_CPU TYPE_RISCV_CPU_SIFIVE_E51
>> +#define SIFIVE_U_CPU TYPE_RISCV_CPU_SIFIVE_U54
>>   #endif
>>
>>   #endif /* HW_SIFIVE_CPU_H */
>> diff --git a/target/riscv/cpu-param.h b/target/riscv/cpu-param.h
>> index 80eb615f93..c10459b56f 100644
>> --- a/target/riscv/cpu-param.h
>> +++ b/target/riscv/cpu-param.h
>> @@ -16,6 +16,11 @@
>>   # define TARGET_LONG_BITS 32
>>   # define TARGET_PHYS_ADDR_SPACE_BITS 34 /* 22-bit PPN */
>>   # define TARGET_VIRT_ADDR_SPACE_BITS 32 /* sv32 */
>> +#else
>> +/* 64-bit target, since QEMU isn't built to have TARGET_LONG_BITS over 64 */
>> +# define TARGET_LONG_BITS 64
>> +# define TARGET_PHYS_ADDR_SPACE_BITS 56 /* 44-bit PPN */
>> +# define TARGET_VIRT_ADDR_SPACE_BITS 48 /* sv48 */
>>   #endif
>>   #define TARGET_PAGE_BITS 12 /* 4 KiB Pages */
>>   /*
>> diff --git a/target/riscv/cpu.h b/target/riscv/cpu.h
>> index 53a295efb7..8ff5b08d15 100644
>> --- a/target/riscv/cpu.h
>> +++ b/target/riscv/cpu.h
>> @@ -38,6 +38,7 @@
>>   #define TYPE_RISCV_CPU_ANY              RISCV_CPU_TYPE_NAME("any")
>>   #define TYPE_RISCV_CPU_BASE32           RISCV_CPU_TYPE_NAME("rv32")
>>   #define TYPE_RISCV_CPU_BASE64           RISCV_CPU_TYPE_NAME("rv64")
>> +#define TYPE_RISCV_CPU_BASE128          RISCV_CPU_TYPE_NAME("rv128")
>>   #define TYPE_RISCV_CPU_IBEX             RISCV_CPU_TYPE_NAME("lowrisc-ibex")
>>   #define TYPE_RISCV_CPU_SHAKTI_C         RISCV_CPU_TYPE_NAME("shakti-c")
>>   #define TYPE_RISCV_CPU_SIFIVE_E31       RISCV_CPU_TYPE_NAME("sifive-e31")
>> @@ -50,6 +51,8 @@
>>   # define TYPE_RISCV_CPU_BASE            TYPE_RISCV_CPU_BASE32
>>   #elif defined(TARGET_RISCV64)
>>   # define TYPE_RISCV_CPU_BASE            TYPE_RISCV_CPU_BASE64
>> +#else
>> +# define TYPE_RISCV_CPU_BASE            TYPE_RISCV_CPU_BASE128
>>   #endif
>>
>>   #define RV(x) ((target_ulong)1 << (x - 'A'))
>> diff --git a/disas/riscv.c b/disas/riscv.c
>> index 793ad14c27..03c8dc9961 100644
>> --- a/disas/riscv.c
>> +++ b/disas/riscv.c
>> @@ -3090,3 +3090,8 @@ int print_insn_riscv64(bfd_vma memaddr, struct disassemble_info *info)
>>   {
>>       return print_insn_riscv(memaddr, info, rv64);
>>   }
>> +
>> +int print_insn_riscv128(bfd_vma memaddr, struct disassemble_info *info)
>> +{
>> +    return print_insn_riscv(memaddr, info, rv128);
>> +}
>> diff --git a/target/riscv/cpu.c b/target/riscv/cpu.c
>> index 364140f5ff..292c916f46 100644
>> --- a/target/riscv/cpu.c
>> +++ b/target/riscv/cpu.c
>> @@ -152,6 +152,8 @@ static void riscv_any_cpu_init(Object *obj)
>>       set_misa(env, MXL_RV32, RVI | RVM | RVA | RVF | RVD | RVC | RVU);
>>   #elif defined(TARGET_RISCV64)
>>       set_misa(env, MXL_RV64, RVI | RVM | RVA | RVF | RVD | RVC | RVU);
>> +#else
>> +    set_misa(env, MXL_RV128, RVI | RVM | RVA | RVF | RVD | RVC | RVU);
>>   #endif
>>       set_priv_version(env, PRIV_VERSION_1_11_0);
>>   }
>> @@ -178,7 +180,7 @@ static void rv64_sifive_e_cpu_init(Object *obj)
>>       set_priv_version(env, PRIV_VERSION_1_10_0);
>>       qdev_prop_set_bit(DEVICE(obj), "mmu", false);
>>   }
>> -#else
>> +#elif defined(TARGET_RISCV32)
>>   static void rv32_base_cpu_init(Object *obj)
>>   {
>>       CPURISCVState *env = &RISCV_CPU(obj)->env;
>> @@ -218,6 +220,13 @@ static void rv32_imafcu_nommu_cpu_init(Object *obj)
>>       set_resetvec(env, DEFAULT_RSTVEC);
>>       qdev_prop_set_bit(DEVICE(obj), "mmu", false);
>>   }
>> +#else
>> +static void rv128_base_cpu_init(Object *obj)
>> +{
>> +    CPURISCVState *env = &RISCV_CPU(obj)->env;
>> +    /* We set this in the realise function */
>> +    set_misa(env, MXL_RV128, 0);
>> +}
>>   #endif
>>
>>   static ObjectClass *riscv_cpu_class_by_name(const char *cpu_model)
>> @@ -402,6 +411,9 @@ static void riscv_cpu_disas_set_info(CPUState *s, disassemble_info *info)
>>       case MXL_RV64:
>>           info->print_insn = print_insn_riscv64;
>>           break;
>> +    case MXL_RV128:
>> +        info->print_insn = print_insn_riscv128;
>> +        break;
>>       default:
>>           g_assert_not_reached();
>>       }
>> @@ -464,6 +476,9 @@ static void riscv_cpu_realize(DeviceState *dev, Error **errp)
>>   #ifdef TARGET_RISCV64
>>       case MXL_RV64:
>>           break;
>> +#elif !defined(TARGET_RISCV32)
>> +    case MXL_RV128:
>> +        break;
>>   #endif
>>       case MXL_RV32:
>>           break;
>> @@ -670,6 +685,7 @@ static gchar *riscv_gdb_arch_name(CPUState *cs)
>>       case MXL_RV32:
>>           return g_strdup("riscv:rv32");
>>       case MXL_RV64:
>> +    case MXL_RV128:
>>           return g_strdup("riscv:rv64");
>>       default:
>>           g_assert_not_reached();
>> @@ -733,7 +749,7 @@ static void riscv_cpu_class_init(ObjectClass *c, void *data)
>>       cc->gdb_num_core_regs = 33;
>>   #if defined(TARGET_RISCV32)
>>       cc->gdb_core_xml_file = "riscv-32bit-cpu.xml";
>> -#elif defined(TARGET_RISCV64)
>> +#else
>>       cc->gdb_core_xml_file = "riscv-64bit-cpu.xml";
>>   #endif
>>       cc->gdb_stop_before_watchpoint = true;
>> @@ -822,6 +838,8 @@ static const TypeInfo riscv_cpu_type_infos[] = {
>>       DEFINE_CPU(TYPE_RISCV_CPU_SIFIVE_E51,       rv64_sifive_e_cpu_init),
>>       DEFINE_CPU(TYPE_RISCV_CPU_SIFIVE_U54,       rv64_sifive_u_cpu_init),
>>       DEFINE_CPU(TYPE_RISCV_CPU_SHAKTI_C,         rv64_sifive_u_cpu_init),
>> +#else
>> +    DEFINE_CPU(TYPE_RISCV_CPU_BASE128,          rv128_base_cpu_init),
>>   #endif
>>   };
>>
>> diff --git a/target/riscv/gdbstub.c b/target/riscv/gdbstub.c
>> index 23429179e2..7672ae123f 100644
>> --- a/target/riscv/gdbstub.c
>> +++ b/target/riscv/gdbstub.c
>> @@ -164,6 +164,11 @@ static int riscv_gen_dynamic_csr_xml(CPUState *cs, int base_reg)
>>       int bitsize = 16 << env->misa_mxl_max;
>>       int i;
>>
>> +    /* Until gdb knows about 128-bit registers */
>> +    if (bitsize > 64) {
>> +        bitsize = 64;
>> +    }
>> +
>>       g_string_printf(s, "<?xml version=\"1.0\"?>");
>>       g_string_append_printf(s, "<!DOCTYPE feature SYSTEM \"gdb-target.dtd\">");
>>       g_string_append_printf(s, "<feature name=\"org.gnu.gdb.riscv.csr\">");
>> @@ -204,6 +209,9 @@ void riscv_cpu_register_gdb_regs_for_features(CPUState *cs)
>>   #elif defined(TARGET_RISCV64)
>>       gdb_register_coprocessor(cs, riscv_gdb_get_virtual, riscv_gdb_set_virtual,
>>                                1, "riscv-64bit-virtual.xml", 0);
>> +#else
>> +    gdb_register_coprocessor(cs, riscv_gdb_get_virtual, riscv_gdb_set_virtual,
>> +                             1, "riscv-64bit-virtual.xml", 0);
>>   #endif
>>
>>       gdb_register_coprocessor(cs, riscv_gdb_get_csr, riscv_gdb_set_csr,
>> diff --git a/target/riscv/insn_trans/trans_rvd.c.inc b/target/riscv/insn_trans/trans_rvd.c.inc
>> index ed444b042a..c8848bf300 100644
>> --- a/target/riscv/insn_trans/trans_rvd.c.inc
>> +++ b/target/riscv/insn_trans/trans_rvd.c.inc
>> @@ -395,11 +395,11 @@ static bool trans_fmv_x_d(DisasContext *ctx, arg_fmv_x_d *a)
>>       REQUIRE_FPU;
>>       REQUIRE_EXT(ctx, RVD);
>>
>> -#ifdef TARGET_RISCV64
>> +#ifdef TARGET_RISCV32
>> +    qemu_build_not_reached();
>> +#else
>>       gen_set_gpr(ctx, a->rd, cpu_fpr[a->rs1]);
>>       return true;
>> -#else
>> -    qemu_build_not_reached();
>>   #endif
>>   }
>>
>> @@ -439,11 +439,11 @@ static bool trans_fmv_d_x(DisasContext *ctx, arg_fmv_d_x *a)
>>       REQUIRE_FPU;
>>       REQUIRE_EXT(ctx, RVD);
>>
>> -#ifdef TARGET_RISCV64
>> +#ifdef TARGET_RISCV32
>> +    qemu_build_not_reached();
>> +#else
>>       tcg_gen_mov_tl(cpu_fpr[a->rd], get_gpr(ctx, a->rs1, EXT_NONE));
>>       mark_fs_dirty(ctx);
>>       return true;
>> -#else
>> -    qemu_build_not_reached();
>>   #endif
>>   }
>> diff --git a/target/riscv/insn_trans/trans_rvf.c.inc b/target/riscv/insn_trans/trans_rvf.c.inc
>> index b5459249c4..fa4681fb21 100644
>> --- a/target/riscv/insn_trans/trans_rvf.c.inc
>> +++ b/target/riscv/insn_trans/trans_rvf.c.inc
>> @@ -313,10 +313,10 @@ static bool trans_fmv_x_w(DisasContext *ctx, arg_fmv_x_w *a)
>>
>>       TCGv dest = dest_gpr(ctx, a->rd);
>>
>> -#if defined(TARGET_RISCV64)
>> -    tcg_gen_ext32s_tl(dest, cpu_fpr[a->rs1]);
>> -#else
>> +#if defined(TARGET_RISCV32)
>>       tcg_gen_extrl_i64_i32(dest, cpu_fpr[a->rs1]);
>> +#else
>> +    tcg_gen_ext32s_tl(dest, cpu_fpr[a->rs1]);
>>   #endif
>>
>>       gen_set_gpr(ctx, a->rd, dest);
>> diff --git a/target/riscv/Kconfig b/target/riscv/Kconfig
>> index b9e5932f13..f9ea52a59a 100644
>> --- a/target/riscv/Kconfig
>> +++ b/target/riscv/Kconfig
>> @@ -3,3 +3,6 @@ config RISCV32
>>
>>   config RISCV64
>>       bool
>> +
>> +config RISCV128
>> +    bool
>> --
>> 2.33.1
>>
>>

-- 
+---------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| Frédéric Pétrot, Pr. Grenoble INP-Ensimag/TIMA,   Ensimag deputy director |
| Mob/Pho: +33 6 74 57 99 65/+33 4 76 57 48 70      Ad augusta  per angusta |
| http://tima.univ-grenoble-alpes.fr frederic.petrot@univ-grenoble-alpes.fr |
+---------------------------------------------------------------------------+

Re: [PATCH v5 07/18] target/riscv: setup everything so that riscv128-softmmu compiles
Posted by Philippe Mathieu-Daudé 4 years, 2 months ago
Hi Frédéric,

On 11/24/21 07:55, Frédéric Pétrot wrote:
> On 24/11/2021 07:12, Alistair Francis wrote:
>> On Sat, Nov 13, 2021 at 1:16 AM Frédéric Pétrot
>> <frederic.petrot@univ-grenoble-alpes.fr> wrote:
>>>
>>> This patch is kind of a mess because several files have to be slightly
>>> modified to allow for a new target. In the current status, we have done
>>> our best to have RV64 and RV128 under the same RV64 umbrella, but there
>>> is still work to do to have a single executable for both.
>>> In particular, we have no atomic accesses for aligned 128-bit addresses.
>>>
>>> Once this patch applied, adding risc128-sofmmu to --target-list produces
>>> a (no so useful yet) executable.
>>
>> I can't remember if we discussed this before, but do we need the
>> riscv128-sofmmu executable? Can we instead just use a riscv64-sofmmu
>> executable?
> 
>   Hello Alistair,
>   Richard was also advocating for a single executable, but pointed out that
>   we need to disable mttcg because there is a need for specific tcg
> support for
>   128-bit aligned atomics.
>   Given my understanding of that part of QEMU, I choose the easy way to
> disable
>   it once and for all at compile time until we have that.


In rv128_base_cpu_init():

  if (qemu_tcg_mttcg_enabled) {
      /* Missing 128-bit aligned atomics */
      error_report("128-bit RISC-V currently does not work"
                   " with Multi Threaded TCG. Please use:"
                   " -accel tcg,thread=single");
      exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
  }

Regards,

Phil.

Re: [PATCH v5 07/18] target/riscv: setup everything so that riscv128-softmmu compiles
Posted by Alistair Francis 4 years, 2 months ago
On Wed, Nov 24, 2021 at 5:33 PM Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org> wrote:
>
> Hi Frédéric,
>
> On 11/24/21 07:55, Frédéric Pétrot wrote:
> > On 24/11/2021 07:12, Alistair Francis wrote:
> >> On Sat, Nov 13, 2021 at 1:16 AM Frédéric Pétrot
> >> <frederic.petrot@univ-grenoble-alpes.fr> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> This patch is kind of a mess because several files have to be slightly
> >>> modified to allow for a new target. In the current status, we have done
> >>> our best to have RV64 and RV128 under the same RV64 umbrella, but there
> >>> is still work to do to have a single executable for both.
> >>> In particular, we have no atomic accesses for aligned 128-bit addresses.
> >>>
> >>> Once this patch applied, adding risc128-sofmmu to --target-list produces
> >>> a (no so useful yet) executable.
> >>
> >> I can't remember if we discussed this before, but do we need the
> >> riscv128-sofmmu executable? Can we instead just use a riscv64-sofmmu
> >> executable?
> >
> >   Hello Alistair,
> >   Richard was also advocating for a single executable, but pointed out that
> >   we need to disable mttcg because there is a need for specific tcg
> > support for
> >   128-bit aligned atomics.
> >   Given my understanding of that part of QEMU, I choose the easy way to
> > disable
> >   it once and for all at compile time until we have that.
>
>
> In rv128_base_cpu_init():
>
>   if (qemu_tcg_mttcg_enabled) {
>       /* Missing 128-bit aligned atomics */
>       error_report("128-bit RISC-V currently does not work"
>                    " with Multi Threaded TCG. Please use:"
>                    " -accel tcg,thread=single");
>       exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
>   }

That seems like a good option! I think we could add this to the CPU
realise function.

The problem with a riscv128-sofmmu executable is that it's hard to get
rid of in the future. We are very slowly moving towards a single
executable and adding a new one means we are stuck with it for a
while.

Alistair

>
> Regards,
>
> Phil.

Re: [PATCH v5 07/18] target/riscv: setup everything so that riscv128-softmmu compiles
Posted by Frédéric Pétrot 4 years, 2 months ago
On 25/11/2021 12:47, Alistair Francis wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 24, 2021 at 5:33 PM Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Frédéric,
>>
>> On 11/24/21 07:55, Frédéric Pétrot wrote:
>>> On 24/11/2021 07:12, Alistair Francis wrote:
>>>> On Sat, Nov 13, 2021 at 1:16 AM Frédéric Pétrot
>>>> <frederic.petrot@univ-grenoble-alpes.fr> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> This patch is kind of a mess because several files have to be slightly
>>>>> modified to allow for a new target. In the current status, we have done
>>>>> our best to have RV64 and RV128 under the same RV64 umbrella, but there
>>>>> is still work to do to have a single executable for both.
>>>>> In particular, we have no atomic accesses for aligned 128-bit addresses.
>>>>>
>>>>> Once this patch applied, adding risc128-sofmmu to --target-list produces
>>>>> a (no so useful yet) executable.
>>>>
>>>> I can't remember if we discussed this before, but do we need the
>>>> riscv128-sofmmu executable? Can we instead just use a riscv64-sofmmu
>>>> executable?
>>>
>>>    Hello Alistair,
>>>    Richard was also advocating for a single executable, but pointed out that
>>>    we need to disable mttcg because there is a need for specific tcg
>>> support for
>>>    128-bit aligned atomics.
>>>    Given my understanding of that part of QEMU, I choose the easy way to
>>> disable
>>>    it once and for all at compile time until we have that.
>>
>>
>> In rv128_base_cpu_init():
>>
>>    if (qemu_tcg_mttcg_enabled) {
>>        /* Missing 128-bit aligned atomics */
>>        error_report("128-bit RISC-V currently does not work"
>>                     " with Multi Threaded TCG. Please use:"
>>                     " -accel tcg,thread=single");
>>        exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
>>    }
> 
> That seems like a good option! I think we could add this to the CPU
> realise function.
> 
> The problem with a riscv128-sofmmu executable is that it's hard to get
> rid of in the future. We are very slowly moving towards a single
> executable and adding a new one means we are stuck with it for a
> while.
> 
> Alistair

   Ooups, I replied yesterday to Philippe that I would work that out, but I
   missed the reply all button, sorry.

   Frédéric
> 
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Phil.

-- 
+---------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| Frédéric Pétrot, Pr. Grenoble INP-Ensimag/TIMA,   Ensimag deputy director |
| Mob/Pho: +33 6 74 57 99 65/+33 4 76 57 48 70      Ad augusta  per angusta |
| http://tima.univ-grenoble-alpes.fr frederic.petrot@univ-grenoble-alpes.fr |
+---------------------------------------------------------------------------+