04.11.2021 13:38, Hanna Reitz wrote:
> bdrv_cor_filter_drop() modifies the block graph. That means that other
> parties can also modify the block graph before it returns. Therefore,
> we cannot assume that the result of a graph traversal we did before
> remains valid afterwards.
>
> We should thus fetch `base` and `unfiltered_base` afterwards instead of
> before.
>
> Signed-off-by: Hanna Reitz <hreitz@redhat.com>
The fact that other parties can modify graph during our graph modification is a global problem.. The patch doesn't fix it, but reduces its effect in specific case.. OK.
Reviewed-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
> ---
> block/stream.c | 7 +++++--
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/block/stream.c b/block/stream.c
> index 97bee482dc..e45113aed6 100644
> --- a/block/stream.c
> +++ b/block/stream.c
> @@ -54,8 +54,8 @@ static int stream_prepare(Job *job)
> {
> StreamBlockJob *s = container_of(job, StreamBlockJob, common.job);
> BlockDriverState *unfiltered_bs = bdrv_skip_filters(s->target_bs);
> - BlockDriverState *base = bdrv_filter_or_cow_bs(s->above_base);
> - BlockDriverState *unfiltered_base = bdrv_skip_filters(base);
> + BlockDriverState *base;
> + BlockDriverState *unfiltered_base;
> Error *local_err = NULL;
> int ret = 0;
>
> @@ -63,6 +63,9 @@ static int stream_prepare(Job *job)
> bdrv_cor_filter_drop(s->cor_filter_bs);
> s->cor_filter_bs = NULL;
>
> + base = bdrv_filter_or_cow_bs(s->above_base);
> + unfiltered_base = bdrv_skip_filters(base);
> +
> if (bdrv_cow_child(unfiltered_bs)) {
> const char *base_id = NULL, *base_fmt = NULL;
> if (unfiltered_base) {
>
--
Best regards,
Vladimir