softmmu/physmem.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
When adding RAM_NORESERVE, we forgot to remove the old assertion when
adding the updated one, most probably when reworking the patches or
rebasing. We can easily crash QEMU by adding
-object memory-backend-ram,id=mem0,size=500G,reserve=off
to the QEMU cmdline:
qemu-system-x86_64: ../softmmu/physmem.c:2146: qemu_ram_alloc_internal:
Assertion `(ram_flags & ~(RAM_SHARED | RAM_RESIZEABLE | RAM_PREALLOC))
== 0' failed.
Fix it by removing the old assertion.
Fixes: 8dbe22c6868b ("memory: Introduce RAM_NORESERVE and wire it up in qemu_ram_mmap()")
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Cc: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
---
softmmu/physmem.c | 1 -
1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/softmmu/physmem.c b/softmmu/physmem.c
index 3c1912a1a0..2e18947598 100644
--- a/softmmu/physmem.c
+++ b/softmmu/physmem.c
@@ -2143,7 +2143,6 @@ RAMBlock *qemu_ram_alloc_internal(ram_addr_t size, ram_addr_t max_size,
RAMBlock *new_block;
Error *local_err = NULL;
- assert((ram_flags & ~(RAM_SHARED | RAM_RESIZEABLE | RAM_PREALLOC)) == 0);
assert((ram_flags & ~(RAM_SHARED | RAM_RESIZEABLE | RAM_PREALLOC |
RAM_NORESERVE)) == 0);
assert(!host ^ (ram_flags & RAM_PREALLOC));
--
2.31.1
On 8/2/21 5:22 PM, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> When adding RAM_NORESERVE, we forgot to remove the old assertion when
> adding the updated one, most probably when reworking the patches or
> rebasing. We can easily crash QEMU by adding
> -object memory-backend-ram,id=mem0,size=500G,reserve=off
> to the QEMU cmdline:
> qemu-system-x86_64: ../softmmu/physmem.c:2146: qemu_ram_alloc_internal:
> Assertion `(ram_flags & ~(RAM_SHARED | RAM_RESIZEABLE | RAM_PREALLOC))
> == 0' failed.
Oops.
> Fix it by removing the old assertion.
>
> Fixes: 8dbe22c6868b ("memory: Introduce RAM_NORESERVE and wire it up in qemu_ram_mmap()")
> Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
> Cc: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
> Cc: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
> ---
> softmmu/physmem.c | 1 -
> 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/softmmu/physmem.c b/softmmu/physmem.c
> index 3c1912a1a0..2e18947598 100644
> --- a/softmmu/physmem.c
> +++ b/softmmu/physmem.c
> @@ -2143,7 +2143,6 @@ RAMBlock *qemu_ram_alloc_internal(ram_addr_t size, ram_addr_t max_size,
> RAMBlock *new_block;
> Error *local_err = NULL;
>
> - assert((ram_flags & ~(RAM_SHARED | RAM_RESIZEABLE | RAM_PREALLOC)) == 0);
> assert((ram_flags & ~(RAM_SHARED | RAM_RESIZEABLE | RAM_PREALLOC |
> RAM_NORESERVE)) == 0);
> assert(!host ^ (ram_flags & RAM_PREALLOC));
>
6.1 material btw.
On 8/2/21 5:26 PM, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> On 8/2/21 5:22 PM, David Hildenbrand wrote:
>> When adding RAM_NORESERVE, we forgot to remove the old assertion when
>> adding the updated one, most probably when reworking the patches or
>> rebasing. We can easily crash QEMU by adding
>> -object memory-backend-ram,id=mem0,size=500G,reserve=off
>> to the QEMU cmdline:
>> qemu-system-x86_64: ../softmmu/physmem.c:2146: qemu_ram_alloc_internal:
>> Assertion `(ram_flags & ~(RAM_SHARED | RAM_RESIZEABLE | RAM_PREALLOC))
>> == 0' failed.
>
> Oops.
>
>> Fix it by removing the old assertion.
>>
>> Fixes: 8dbe22c6868b ("memory: Introduce RAM_NORESERVE and wire it up in qemu_ram_mmap()")
>> Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
>> Cc: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
>> Cc: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
>> Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
>
> Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
> Tested-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
>
>> ---
>> softmmu/physmem.c | 1 -
>> 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/softmmu/physmem.c b/softmmu/physmem.c
>> index 3c1912a1a0..2e18947598 100644
>> --- a/softmmu/physmem.c
>> +++ b/softmmu/physmem.c
>> @@ -2143,7 +2143,6 @@ RAMBlock *qemu_ram_alloc_internal(ram_addr_t size, ram_addr_t max_size,
>> RAMBlock *new_block;
>> Error *local_err = NULL;
>>
>> - assert((ram_flags & ~(RAM_SHARED | RAM_RESIZEABLE | RAM_PREALLOC)) == 0);
>> assert((ram_flags & ~(RAM_SHARED | RAM_RESIZEABLE | RAM_PREALLOC |
>> RAM_NORESERVE)) == 0);
>> assert(!host ^ (ram_flags & RAM_PREALLOC));
>>
>
On 02.08.21 17:27, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote: > 6.1 material btw. Indeed, should have tagged that right away. thanks! -- Thanks, David / dhildenb
On Mon, Aug 02, 2021 at 05:22:38PM +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> When adding RAM_NORESERVE, we forgot to remove the old assertion when
> adding the updated one, most probably when reworking the patches or
> rebasing. We can easily crash QEMU by adding
> -object memory-backend-ram,id=mem0,size=500G,reserve=off
> to the QEMU cmdline:
> qemu-system-x86_64: ../softmmu/physmem.c:2146: qemu_ram_alloc_internal:
> Assertion `(ram_flags & ~(RAM_SHARED | RAM_RESIZEABLE | RAM_PREALLOC))
> == 0' failed.
>
> Fix it by removing the old assertion.
>
> Fixes: 8dbe22c6868b ("memory: Introduce RAM_NORESERVE and wire it up in qemu_ram_mmap()")
> Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
> Cc: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
> Cc: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
--
Peter Xu
© 2016 - 2026 Red Hat, Inc.