target/arm/kvm.c | 17 ++++++++--------- 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
As per commit 5626f8c6d468 ("rcu: Add automatically released rcu_read_lock
variants"), RCU_READ_LOCK_GUARD() should be used instead of
rcu_read_{un}lock().
Signed-off-by: Hamza Mahfooz <someguy@effective-light.com>
---
target/arm/kvm.c | 17 ++++++++---------
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/target/arm/kvm.c b/target/arm/kvm.c
index d8381ba224..5d55de1a49 100644
--- a/target/arm/kvm.c
+++ b/target/arm/kvm.c
@@ -998,7 +998,6 @@ int kvm_arch_fixup_msi_route(struct kvm_irq_routing_entry *route,
hwaddr xlat, len, doorbell_gpa;
MemoryRegionSection mrs;
MemoryRegion *mr;
- int ret = 1;
if (as == &address_space_memory) {
return 0;
@@ -1006,15 +1005,19 @@ int kvm_arch_fixup_msi_route(struct kvm_irq_routing_entry *route,
/* MSI doorbell address is translated by an IOMMU */
- rcu_read_lock();
+ RCU_READ_LOCK_GUARD();
+
mr = address_space_translate(as, address, &xlat, &len, true,
MEMTXATTRS_UNSPECIFIED);
+
if (!mr) {
- goto unlock;
+ return 1;
}
+
mrs = memory_region_find(mr, xlat, 1);
+
if (!mrs.mr) {
- goto unlock;
+ return 1;
}
doorbell_gpa = mrs.offset_within_address_space;
@@ -1025,11 +1028,7 @@ int kvm_arch_fixup_msi_route(struct kvm_irq_routing_entry *route,
trace_kvm_arm_fixup_msi_route(address, doorbell_gpa);
- ret = 0;
-
-unlock:
- rcu_read_unlock();
- return ret;
+ return 0;
}
int kvm_arch_add_msi_route_post(struct kvm_irq_routing_entry *route,
--
2.32.0
On 28/07/21 01:52, Hamza Mahfooz wrote: > As per commit 5626f8c6d468 ("rcu: Add automatically released rcu_read_lock > variants"), RCU_READ_LOCK_GUARD() should be used instead of > rcu_read_{un}lock(). > > Signed-off-by: Hamza Mahfooz <someguy@effective-light.com> > --- Reviewed-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> > target/arm/kvm.c | 17 ++++++++--------- > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/target/arm/kvm.c b/target/arm/kvm.c > index d8381ba224..5d55de1a49 100644 > --- a/target/arm/kvm.c > +++ b/target/arm/kvm.c > @@ -998,7 +998,6 @@ int kvm_arch_fixup_msi_route(struct kvm_irq_routing_entry *route, > hwaddr xlat, len, doorbell_gpa; > MemoryRegionSection mrs; > MemoryRegion *mr; > - int ret = 1; > > if (as == &address_space_memory) { > return 0; > @@ -1006,15 +1005,19 @@ int kvm_arch_fixup_msi_route(struct kvm_irq_routing_entry *route, > > /* MSI doorbell address is translated by an IOMMU */ > > - rcu_read_lock(); > + RCU_READ_LOCK_GUARD(); > + > mr = address_space_translate(as, address, &xlat, &len, true, > MEMTXATTRS_UNSPECIFIED); > + > if (!mr) { > - goto unlock; > + return 1; > } > + > mrs = memory_region_find(mr, xlat, 1); > + > if (!mrs.mr) { > - goto unlock; > + return 1; > } > > doorbell_gpa = mrs.offset_within_address_space; > @@ -1025,11 +1028,7 @@ int kvm_arch_fixup_msi_route(struct kvm_irq_routing_entry *route, > > trace_kvm_arm_fixup_msi_route(address, doorbell_gpa); > > - ret = 0; > - > -unlock: > - rcu_read_unlock(); > - return ret; > + return 0; > } > > int kvm_arch_add_msi_route_post(struct kvm_irq_routing_entry *route, >
On Wed, 28 Jul 2021 at 08:30, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> wrote: > > On 28/07/21 01:52, Hamza Mahfooz wrote: > > As per commit 5626f8c6d468 ("rcu: Add automatically released rcu_read_lock > > variants"), RCU_READ_LOCK_GUARD() should be used instead of > > rcu_read_{un}lock(). > > > > Signed-off-by: Hamza Mahfooz <someguy@effective-light.com> > > --- > > Reviewed-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> Applied to target-arm.next for 6.2, thanks. -- PMM
© 2016 - 2024 Red Hat, Inc.