We must use the BQL for do_run_on_cpu() without much choice, it means the
parameter is helpless.  Remove it.  Meanwhile use the newly introduced
qemu_cond_wait_iothread() in do_run_on_cpu().

Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
---
 softmmu/cpus.c | 7 +++----
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/softmmu/cpus.c b/softmmu/cpus.c
index 94c2804192..9131f77f87 100644
--- a/softmmu/cpus.c
+++ b/softmmu/cpus.c
@@ -383,8 +383,7 @@ void qemu_init_cpu_loop(void)
 }
 
 static void
-do_run_on_cpu(CPUState *cpu, run_on_cpu_func func, run_on_cpu_data data,
-              QemuMutex *mutex)
+do_run_on_cpu(CPUState *cpu, run_on_cpu_func func, run_on_cpu_data data)
 {
     struct qemu_work_item wi;
 
@@ -403,14 +402,14 @@ do_run_on_cpu(CPUState *cpu, run_on_cpu_func func, run_on_cpu_data data,
     while (!qatomic_mb_read(&wi.done)) {
         CPUState *self_cpu = current_cpu;
 
-        qemu_cond_wait(&qemu_work_cond, mutex);
+        qemu_cond_wait_iothread(&qemu_work_cond);
         current_cpu = self_cpu;
     }
 }
 
 void run_on_cpu(CPUState *cpu, run_on_cpu_func func, run_on_cpu_data data)
 {
-    do_run_on_cpu(cpu, func, data, &qemu_global_mutex);
+    do_run_on_cpu(cpu, func, data);
 }
 
 static void qemu_cpu_stop(CPUState *cpu, bool exit)
-- 
2.31.1

On 23.07.21 21:34, Peter Xu wrote:
> We must use the BQL for do_run_on_cpu() without much choice, it means the
> parameter is helpless.  Remove it.  Meanwhile use the newly introduced

s/helpless/useless/ ?

Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>

-- 
Thanks,

David / dhildenb