On Fri, 23 Jul 2021 at 18:44, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> On 7/23/21 7:03 PM, Alex Bennée wrote:
> > I realised I'm on holiday next week so I thought I'd better send this now.
> >
> > The following changes since commit a146af86c8247f41b641783428b95ee71eb0e43f:
> >
> > Merge remote-tracking branch 'remotes/kraxel/tags/vga-20210723-pull-request' into staging (2021-07-23 12:16:12 +0100)
> >
> > are available in the Git repository at:
> >
> > https://github.com/stsquad/qemu.git tags/pull-for-6.1-rc1-230721-1
> >
> > for you to fetch changes up to 0a9487d80af9ed6fa14d2696bc34a920b32e53e5:
> >
> > gitlab-ci: Extract OpenSBI job rules to reusable section (2021-07-23 17:22:16 +0100)
> >
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------
> > Doc, metadata, plugin and testing updates for 6.1-rc1:
> >
> > - git ignore some file editor detritus
> > - add overview on device emulation terminology
> > - remove needless if leg in configure custom devices logic
> > - numerous gitdm/mailmap updates
> > - fix plugin_exit race for linux-user
> > - fix a few bugs in cache modelling plugin
> > - fix plugin calculation of physical address
> > - handle pure assembler/linker tcg tests outside of docker
> > - add tricore build to gitlab
> > - remove superfluous MacOSX task
> > - generalise the OpenBSI gitlab rules
> >
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
> > Philippe Mathieu-Daudé (1):
> > gitlab-ci: Extract OpenSBI job rules to reusable section
>
> Oops this isn't to latest version of this patch :/
>
> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2021-07/msg06130.html
Given Alex is on holiday, should I apply this pullreq anyway and
then you could send a patch to fix up the differences afterwards,
or should we drop the pullreq (and maybe this stuff doesn't
go in for rc1)?
-- PMM