Le 03/08/2021 à 10:13, Cornelia Huck a écrit :
> On Mon, Jul 05 2021, Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com> wrote:
>
>> qemu-s390x puts a wrong value into SIGILL's siginfo_t's psw.addr: it
>> should be a pointer to the instruction following the illegal
>> instruction, but at the moment it is a pointer to the illegal
>> instruction itself. This breaks OpenJDK, which relies on this value.
>> A similar problem exists for SIGFPE.
>>
>> Patch 1 fixes the issue, patch 2 adds a test.
>>
>> v1: https://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2021-05/msg06592.html
>> v1 -> v2: Use a better buglink (Cornelia), simplify the inline asm
>> magic in the test and add an explanation (David).
>>
>> v2: https://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2021-05/msg06649.html
>> v2 -> v3: Fix SIGSEGV handling (found when trying to run valgrind under
>> qemu-user).
>>
>> v3: https://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2021-06/msg00299.html
>> v3 -> v4: Fix compiling the test on Ubuntu 20.04 (Jonathan).
>>
>> v4: https://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2021-06/msg05848.html
>> v4 -> v5: Greatly simplify the fix (Ulrich).
>>
>> v5: https://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2021-06/msg06244.html
>> v5 -> v6: Fix breakpoints (David). Add gdbstub test.
>>
>> Note: the compare-and-trap SIGFPE issue is being fixed separately.
>> https://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2021-06/msg05690.html
>>
>> Ilya Leoshkevich (2):
>> target/s390x: Fix SIGILL and SIGFPE psw.addr reporting
>> tests/tcg/s390x: Test SIGILL and SIGSEGV handling
>>
>> linux-user/s390x/cpu_loop.c | 12 +-
>> tests/tcg/s390x/Makefile.target | 18 +-
>> tests/tcg/s390x/gdbstub/test-signals-s390x.py | 76 ++++++++
>> tests/tcg/s390x/signals-s390x.c | 165 ++++++++++++++++++
>> 4 files changed, 269 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>> create mode 100644 tests/tcg/s390x/gdbstub/test-signals-s390x.py
>> create mode 100644 tests/tcg/s390x/signals-s390x.c
>
> So, I'd like to see this merged, but I'm unsure on what we agreed -- I
> thought this would go via linux-user. Do I misremember?
>
Please, take them via the s390x branch.
Thanks,
Laurent