hw/s390x/css.c | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---- hw/vfio/ccw.c | 4 ++-- include/hw/s390x/css.h | 3 ++- 3 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
This is a followup on the first version (which I had sent out in May, and which kind of fell through the cracks.) While the first patch is mostly unchanged, I added a second patch to address some possible problems with the generated unit exceptions; non-vfio subchannels are not affected by this. As before, this works on the good path, and I have not managed to actually get my system to exercise the error path :( v1->v2: - add comments regarding -ENODEV/-EACCES handling - add second patch Cornelia Huck (2): vfio-ccw: forward halt/clear errors css: fix actl handling for unit exceptions hw/s390x/css.c | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---- hw/vfio/ccw.c | 4 ++-- include/hw/s390x/css.h | 3 ++- 3 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) -- 2.31.1
On 7/5/21 12:39 PM, Cornelia Huck wrote: > This is a followup on the first version (which I had sent out in May, > and which kind of fell through the cracks.) While the first patch > is mostly unchanged, I added a second patch to address some possible > problems with the generated unit exceptions; non-vfio subchannels > are not affected by this. > > As before, this works on the good path, and I have not managed to > actually get my system to exercise the error path :( Sorry for the silence, was out of office for a bit and Eric is unavailable -- Anyway the code LGTM and matches what I see in the POPs, I'd be willing to ACK but I'd feel better if we could exercise the error paths before merging. @Jared/@Mike, you've both had eyes on this area of code recently, would one of you be willing to take a crack at a tested-by (non-zero CCs on HSCH/CSCH + also drive the sch_gen_unit_exception path)? > > v1->v2: > - add comments regarding -ENODEV/-EACCES handling > - add second patch > > Cornelia Huck (2): > vfio-ccw: forward halt/clear errors > css: fix actl handling for unit exceptions > > hw/s390x/css.c | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---- > hw/vfio/ccw.c | 4 ++-- > include/hw/s390x/css.h | 3 ++- > 3 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) >
I will take a look and see if I can exercise the error paths. Regards, Jared Rossi On 7/19/21 10:16 AM, Matthew Rosato wrote: > On 7/5/21 12:39 PM, Cornelia Huck wrote: >> This is a followup on the first version (which I had sent out in May, >> and which kind of fell through the cracks.) While the first patch >> is mostly unchanged, I added a second patch to address some possible >> problems with the generated unit exceptions; non-vfio subchannels >> are not affected by this. >> >> As before, this works on the good path, and I have not managed to >> actually get my system to exercise the error path :( > > Sorry for the silence, was out of office for a bit and Eric is > unavailable -- Anyway the code LGTM and matches what I see in the > POPs, I'd be willing to ACK but I'd feel better if we could exercise > the error paths before merging. > > @Jared/@Mike, you've both had eyes on this area of code recently, > would one of you be willing to take a crack at a tested-by (non-zero > CCs on HSCH/CSCH + also drive the sch_gen_unit_exception path)? > >> >> v1->v2: >> - add comments regarding -ENODEV/-EACCES handling >> - add second patch >> >> Cornelia Huck (2): >> vfio-ccw: forward halt/clear errors >> css: fix actl handling for unit exceptions >> >> hw/s390x/css.c | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---- >> hw/vfio/ccw.c | 4 ++-- >> include/hw/s390x/css.h | 3 ++- >> 3 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) >> >
I've exercised the error paths and it appears to all work correctly. On 7/19/21 11:09 AM, Jared Rossi wrote: > I will take a look and see if I can exercise the error paths. > > Regards, > > Jared Rossi > > On 7/19/21 10:16 AM, Matthew Rosato wrote: >> On 7/5/21 12:39 PM, Cornelia Huck wrote: >>> This is a followup on the first version (which I had sent out in May, >>> and which kind of fell through the cracks.) While the first patch >>> is mostly unchanged, I added a second patch to address some possible >>> problems with the generated unit exceptions; non-vfio subchannels >>> are not affected by this. >>> >>> As before, this works on the good path, and I have not managed to >>> actually get my system to exercise the error path :( >> >> Sorry for the silence, was out of office for a bit and Eric is >> unavailable -- Anyway the code LGTM and matches what I see in the >> POPs, I'd be willing to ACK but I'd feel better if we could exercise >> the error paths before merging. >> >> @Jared/@Mike, you've both had eyes on this area of code recently, >> would one of you be willing to take a crack at a tested-by (non-zero >> CCs on HSCH/CSCH + also drive the sch_gen_unit_exception path)? >> >>> >>> v1->v2: >>> - add comments regarding -ENODEV/-EACCES handling >>> - add second patch >>> >>> Cornelia Huck (2): >>> vfio-ccw: forward halt/clear errors >>> css: fix actl handling for unit exceptions >>> >>> hw/s390x/css.c | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---- >>> hw/vfio/ccw.c | 4 ++-- >>> include/hw/s390x/css.h | 3 ++- >>> 3 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) >>> >>
On 8/4/21 8:30 PM, Jared Rossi wrote: > I've exercised the error paths and it appears to all work correctly. > > On 7/19/21 11:09 AM, Jared Rossi wrote: >> I will take a look and see if I can exercise the error paths. >> >> Regards, >> >> Jared Rossi Thanks Jared! So, with that I'd suggest a Tested-by: Jared Rossi <jrossi@linux.ibm.com> and as I said earlier the code LGTM -- so for the series: Reviewed-by: Matthew Rosato <mjrosato@linux.ibm.com> >> >> On 7/19/21 10:16 AM, Matthew Rosato wrote: >>> On 7/5/21 12:39 PM, Cornelia Huck wrote: >>>> This is a followup on the first version (which I had sent out in May, >>>> and which kind of fell through the cracks.) While the first patch >>>> is mostly unchanged, I added a second patch to address some possible >>>> problems with the generated unit exceptions; non-vfio subchannels >>>> are not affected by this. >>>> >>>> As before, this works on the good path, and I have not managed to >>>> actually get my system to exercise the error path :( >>> >>> Sorry for the silence, was out of office for a bit and Eric is >>> unavailable -- Anyway the code LGTM and matches what I see in the >>> POPs, I'd be willing to ACK but I'd feel better if we could exercise >>> the error paths before merging. >>> >>> @Jared/@Mike, you've both had eyes on this area of code recently, >>> would one of you be willing to take a crack at a tested-by (non-zero >>> CCs on HSCH/CSCH + also drive the sch_gen_unit_exception path)? >>> >>>> >>>> v1->v2: >>>> - add comments regarding -ENODEV/-EACCES handling >>>> - add second patch >>>> >>>> Cornelia Huck (2): >>>> vfio-ccw: forward halt/clear errors >>>> css: fix actl handling for unit exceptions >>>> >>>> hw/s390x/css.c | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---- >>>> hw/vfio/ccw.c | 4 ++-- >>>> include/hw/s390x/css.h | 3 ++- >>>> 3 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) >>>> >>>
On Wed, Aug 04 2021, Matthew Rosato <mjrosato@linux.ibm.com> wrote: > On 8/4/21 8:30 PM, Jared Rossi wrote: >> I've exercised the error paths and it appears to all work correctly. >> >> On 7/19/21 11:09 AM, Jared Rossi wrote: >>> I will take a look and see if I can exercise the error paths. >>> >>> Regards, >>> >>> Jared Rossi > > Thanks Jared! So, with that I'd suggest a > > Tested-by: Jared Rossi <jrossi@linux.ibm.com> I took the liberty to include that. > > and as I said earlier the code LGTM -- so for the series: > > Reviewed-by: Matthew Rosato <mjrosato@linux.ibm.com> Thanks to you both! > >>> >>> On 7/19/21 10:16 AM, Matthew Rosato wrote: >>>> On 7/5/21 12:39 PM, Cornelia Huck wrote: >>>>> This is a followup on the first version (which I had sent out in May, >>>>> and which kind of fell through the cracks.) While the first patch >>>>> is mostly unchanged, I added a second patch to address some possible >>>>> problems with the generated unit exceptions; non-vfio subchannels >>>>> are not affected by this. >>>>> >>>>> As before, this works on the good path, and I have not managed to >>>>> actually get my system to exercise the error path :( >>>> >>>> Sorry for the silence, was out of office for a bit and Eric is >>>> unavailable -- Anyway the code LGTM and matches what I see in the >>>> POPs, I'd be willing to ACK but I'd feel better if we could exercise >>>> the error paths before merging. >>>> >>>> @Jared/@Mike, you've both had eyes on this area of code recently, >>>> would one of you be willing to take a crack at a tested-by (non-zero >>>> CCs on HSCH/CSCH + also drive the sch_gen_unit_exception path)? >>>> >>>>> >>>>> v1->v2: >>>>> - add comments regarding -ENODEV/-EACCES handling >>>>> - add second patch >>>>> >>>>> Cornelia Huck (2): >>>>> vfio-ccw: forward halt/clear errors >>>>> css: fix actl handling for unit exceptions >>>>> >>>>> hw/s390x/css.c | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---- >>>>> hw/vfio/ccw.c | 4 ++-- >>>>> include/hw/s390x/css.h | 3 ++- >>>>> 3 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) >>>>> >>>> Queued to s390-next.
© 2016 - 2024 Red Hat, Inc.