[PATCH v2 03/23] linux-user/arm: Split out v2_frame

Richard Henderson posted 23 patches 4 years, 7 months ago
Maintainers: Taylor Simpson <tsimpson@quicinc.com>, Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>, Aurelien Jarno <aurelien@aurel32.net>, Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>, "Philippe Mathieu-Daudé" <f4bug@amsat.org>, Jiaxun Yang <jiaxun.yang@flygoat.com>, Laurent Vivier <laurent@vivier.eu>, Aleksandar Rikalo <aleksandar.rikalo@syrmia.com>
There is a newer version of this series
[PATCH v2 03/23] linux-user/arm: Split out v2_frame
Posted by Richard Henderson 4 years, 7 months ago
Split out a helper function to test for a v2 signal frame.

Cc: qemu-arm@nongnu.org
Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
---
 linux-user/arm/signal.c | 13 +++++++++----
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/linux-user/arm/signal.c b/linux-user/arm/signal.c
index 32b68ee302..cb65623965 100644
--- a/linux-user/arm/signal.c
+++ b/linux-user/arm/signal.c
@@ -165,6 +165,11 @@ static inline int valid_user_regs(CPUARMState *regs)
     return 1;
 }
 
+static bool v2_frame(void)
+{
+    return get_osversion() >= 0x020612;
+}
+
 static void
 setup_sigcontext(struct target_sigcontext *sc, /*struct _fpstate *fpstate,*/
                  CPUARMState *env, abi_ulong mask)
@@ -422,7 +427,7 @@ sigsegv:
 void setup_frame(int usig, struct target_sigaction *ka,
                  target_sigset_t *set, CPUARMState *regs)
 {
-    if (get_osversion() >= 0x020612) {
+    if (v2_frame()) {
         setup_frame_v2(usig, ka, set, regs);
     } else {
         setup_frame_v1(usig, ka, set, regs);
@@ -516,7 +521,7 @@ void setup_rt_frame(int usig, struct target_sigaction *ka,
                     target_siginfo_t *info,
                     target_sigset_t *set, CPUARMState *env)
 {
-    if (get_osversion() >= 0x020612) {
+    if (v2_frame()) {
         setup_rt_frame_v2(usig, ka, info, set, env);
     } else {
         setup_rt_frame_v1(usig, ka, info, set, env);
@@ -734,7 +739,7 @@ badframe:
 
 long do_sigreturn(CPUARMState *env)
 {
-    if (get_osversion() >= 0x020612) {
+    if (v2_frame()) {
         return do_sigreturn_v2(env);
     } else {
         return do_sigreturn_v1(env);
@@ -823,7 +828,7 @@ badframe:
 
 long do_rt_sigreturn(CPUARMState *env)
 {
-    if (get_osversion() >= 0x020612) {
+    if (v2_frame()) {
         return do_rt_sigreturn_v2(env);
     } else {
         return do_rt_sigreturn_v1(env);
-- 
2.25.1


Re: [PATCH v2 03/23] linux-user/arm: Split out v2_frame
Posted by Peter Maydell 4 years, 7 months ago
On Fri, 18 Jun 2021 at 20:32, Richard Henderson
<richard.henderson@linaro.org> wrote:
>
> Split out a helper function to test for a v2 signal frame.
>
> Cc: qemu-arm@nongnu.org
> Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
> ---
>  linux-user/arm/signal.c | 13 +++++++++----
>  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/linux-user/arm/signal.c b/linux-user/arm/signal.c
> index 32b68ee302..cb65623965 100644
> --- a/linux-user/arm/signal.c
> +++ b/linux-user/arm/signal.c
> @@ -165,6 +165,11 @@ static inline int valid_user_regs(CPUARMState *regs)
>      return 1;
>  }
>
> +static bool v2_frame(void)
> +{
> +    return get_osversion() >= 0x020612;
> +}

Not sure how much we care about supporting claiming to be a 15-year-old
kernel any more (especially since we set UNAME_MINIMUM_RELEASE to 2.6.32...)
so it's awfully tempting to just blow away the v1 frame support instead...

Anyway
Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>

thanks
-- PMM

Re: [PATCH v2 03/23] linux-user/arm: Split out v2_frame
Posted by Richard Henderson 4 years, 7 months ago
On 6/29/21 6:53 AM, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On Fri, 18 Jun 2021 at 20:32, Richard Henderson
> <richard.henderson@linaro.org> wrote:
>>
>> Split out a helper function to test for a v2 signal frame.
>>
>> Cc: qemu-arm@nongnu.org
>> Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
>> ---
>>   linux-user/arm/signal.c | 13 +++++++++----
>>   1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/linux-user/arm/signal.c b/linux-user/arm/signal.c
>> index 32b68ee302..cb65623965 100644
>> --- a/linux-user/arm/signal.c
>> +++ b/linux-user/arm/signal.c
>> @@ -165,6 +165,11 @@ static inline int valid_user_regs(CPUARMState *regs)
>>       return 1;
>>   }
>>
>> +static bool v2_frame(void)
>> +{
>> +    return get_osversion() >= 0x020612;
>> +}
> 
> Not sure how much we care about supporting claiming to be a 15-year-old
> kernel any more (especially since we set UNAME_MINIMUM_RELEASE to 2.6.32...)
> so it's awfully tempting to just blow away the v1 frame support instead...
> 
> Anyway
> Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>

I hadn't noticed the minimum release setting.  Yes, I think it would be better to remove 
the v1 support instead of bodging around it like this.


r~