In tlbi_aa64_vae2is_write() the calculation
  bits = tlbbits_for_regime(env, secure ? ARMMMUIdx_E2 : ARMMMUIdx_SE2,
                            pageaddr)

has the two arms of the ?: expression reversed. Fix the bug.

Fixes: b6ad6062f1e5
Reported-by: Rebecca Cran <rebecca@nuviainc.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org>
Reviewed-by: Rémi Denis-Courmont <remi.denis.courmont@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Rebecca Cran <rebecca@nuviainc.com>
Message-id: 20210420123106.10861-1-peter.maydell@linaro.org
---
 target/arm/helper.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/target/arm/helper.c b/target/arm/helper.c
index 9b1b98705f9..3b365a78cbc 100644
--- a/target/arm/helper.c
+++ b/target/arm/helper.c
@@ -4742,7 +4742,7 @@ static void tlbi_aa64_vae2is_write(CPUARMState *env, const ARMCPRegInfo *ri,
     uint64_t pageaddr = sextract64(value << 12, 0, 56);
     bool secure = arm_is_secure_below_el3(env);
     int mask = secure ? ARMMMUIdxBit_SE2 : ARMMMUIdxBit_E2;
-    int bits = tlbbits_for_regime(env, secure ? ARMMMUIdx_E2 : ARMMMUIdx_SE2,
+    int bits = tlbbits_for_regime(env, secure ? ARMMMUIdx_SE2 : ARMMMUIdx_E2,
                                   pageaddr);
 
     tlb_flush_page_bits_by_mmuidx_all_cpus_synced(cs, pageaddr, mask, bits);
-- 
2.20.1