[PATCH 0/2] virtiofsd: Meson build fixes

Philippe Mathieu-Daudé posted 2 patches 3 years ago
Test checkpatch passed
Patches applied successfully (tree, apply log)
git fetch https://github.com/patchew-project/qemu tags/patchew/20210428144813.417170-1-philmd@redhat.com
There is a newer version of this series
meson.build      |  4 ++--
util/meson.build | 10 +++++++---
2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
[PATCH 0/2] virtiofsd: Meson build fixes
Posted by Philippe Mathieu-Daudé 3 years ago
A pair of fixes to allow building virtiofsd without sysemu/tools.

Should this configuration be tested in CI?

Regards,

Phil.

Philippe Mathieu-Daudé (2):
  meson: Check for seccomp/cap-ng libraries if virtiofsd is enabled
  util/meson: Build iov/hexdump/buffer_is_zero with virtiofsd

 meson.build      |  4 ++--
 util/meson.build | 10 +++++++---
 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

-- 
2.26.3


Re: [PATCH 0/2] virtiofsd: Meson build fixes
Posted by Peter Maydell 3 years ago
On Wed, 28 Apr 2021 at 15:53, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> A pair of fixes to allow building virtiofsd without sysemu/tools.
>
> Should this configuration be tested in CI?

Does the configuration make sense to support? I thought
virtiofsd was only of use with system emulation ?

thanks
-- PMM

Re: [PATCH 0/2] virtiofsd: Meson build fixes
Posted by Dr. David Alan Gilbert 3 years ago
* Peter Maydell (peter.maydell@linaro.org) wrote:
> On Wed, 28 Apr 2021 at 15:53, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> > A pair of fixes to allow building virtiofsd without sysemu/tools.
> >
> > Should this configuration be tested in CI?
> 
> Does the configuration make sense to support? I thought
> virtiofsd was only of use with system emulation ?

It probably is; although arguably it makes sense to build
virtiofsd by itself without either emulation.

Dave

> thanks
> -- PMM
> 
-- 
Dr. David Alan Gilbert / dgilbert@redhat.com / Manchester, UK