The SSE-300 has a Cortex-M55 (which was the whole reason for us
modelling it), but we forgot to actually update the code to let it
have a different CPU type from the IoTKit and SSE-200.  Add CPU type
as a field for ARMSSEInfo instead of hardcoding it to always use a
Cortex-M33.

Buglink: https://bugs.launchpad.net/qemu/+bug/1923861
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
---
This is a rather embarrassing bug. None of the test code I ran
on the a547 model actually cared about the CPU specifically being
an M55... Another one for the "maybe in rc4" bucket.

 hw/arm/armsse.c | 7 +++++--
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/hw/arm/armsse.c b/hw/arm/armsse.c
index 170dea8632d..2e5d0679e7b 100644
--- a/hw/arm/armsse.c
+++ b/hw/arm/armsse.c
@@ -56,6 +56,7 @@ typedef struct ARMSSEDeviceInfo {
 
 struct ARMSSEInfo {
     const char *name;
+    const char *cpu_type;
     uint32_t sse_version;
     int sram_banks;
     int num_cpus;
@@ -501,6 +502,7 @@ static const ARMSSEInfo armsse_variants[] = {
     {
         .name = TYPE_IOTKIT,
         .sse_version = ARMSSE_IOTKIT,
+        .cpu_type = ARM_CPU_TYPE_NAME("cortex-m33"),
         .sram_banks = 1,
         .num_cpus = 1,
         .sys_version = 0x41743,
@@ -519,6 +521,7 @@ static const ARMSSEInfo armsse_variants[] = {
     {
         .name = TYPE_SSE200,
         .sse_version = ARMSSE_SSE200,
+        .cpu_type = ARM_CPU_TYPE_NAME("cortex-m33"),
         .sram_banks = 4,
         .num_cpus = 2,
         .sys_version = 0x22041743,
@@ -537,6 +540,7 @@ static const ARMSSEInfo armsse_variants[] = {
     {
         .name = TYPE_SSE300,
         .sse_version = ARMSSE_SSE300,
+        .cpu_type = ARM_CPU_TYPE_NAME("cortex-m55"),
         .sram_banks = 2,
         .num_cpus = 1,
         .sys_version = 0x7e00043b,
@@ -719,8 +723,7 @@ static void armsse_init(Object *obj)
         name = g_strdup_printf("armv7m%d", i);
         object_initialize_child(OBJECT(&s->cluster[i]), name, &s->armv7m[i],
                                 TYPE_ARMV7M);
-        qdev_prop_set_string(DEVICE(&s->armv7m[i]), "cpu-type",
-                             ARM_CPU_TYPE_NAME("cortex-m33"));
+        qdev_prop_set_string(DEVICE(&s->armv7m[i]), "cpu-type", info->cpu_type);
         g_free(name);
         name = g_strdup_printf("arm-sse-cpu-container%d", i);
         memory_region_init(&s->cpu_container[i], obj, name, UINT64_MAX);
-- 
2.20.1

On 4/16/21 12:40 PM, Peter Maydell wrote:
> The SSE-300 has a Cortex-M55 (which was the whole reason for us
> modelling it), but we forgot to actually update the code to let it
> have a different CPU type from the IoTKit and SSE-200.  Add CPU type
> as a field for ARMSSEInfo instead of hardcoding it to always use a
> Cortex-M33.
> 
> Buglink: https://bugs.launchpad.net/qemu/+bug/1923861
> Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
> ---
> This is a rather embarrassing bug. None of the test code I ran
> on the a547 model actually cared about the CPU specifically being
> an M55... Another one for the "maybe in rc4" bucket.

Yes please.

Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org>

> 
>  hw/arm/armsse.c | 7 +++++--
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

On 4/16/21 3:40 AM, Peter Maydell wrote:
> The SSE-300 has a Cortex-M55 (which was the whole reason for us
> modelling it), but we forgot to actually update the code to let it
> have a different CPU type from the IoTKit and SSE-200.  Add CPU type
> as a field for ARMSSEInfo instead of hardcoding it to always use a
> Cortex-M33.
> 
> Buglink:https://bugs.launchpad.net/qemu/+bug/1923861
> Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell<peter.maydell@linaro.org>
> ---
> This is a rather embarrassing bug. None of the test code I ran
> on the a547 model actually cared about the CPU specifically being
> an M55... Another one for the "maybe in rc4" bucket.

Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>

r~