On Thu, 2021-04-15 at 17:39 +0200, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> On Thu, 15 Apr 2021 15:03:01 +0200
> Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> > If arch-specific code generates a translation block of size 0,
> > tb_gen_code() may generate a spurious exception.
> >
> > Fix s390x (patch 1), ARM (patch 2) and xtensa (patch 3) and add an
> > assertion in order to catch such situations earlier (patch 4).
> >
> > v1:
> > https://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2021-04/msg02037.html
> > v1 -> v2: Fix target/s390x instead of trying to tolerate tb->size
> > == 0
> > in tb_gen_code().
> >
> > v2:
> > https://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2021-04/msg02101.html
> > v2 -> v3: Split the common code change into a separate patch, add
> > the
> > ARM patch in order to fix
> > https://gitlab.com/cohuck/qemu/-/jobs/1178409450
> >
> > v3:
> > https://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2021-04/msg02332.html
> > v3 -> v4: Add the xtensa patch in order to fix
> > https://gitlab.com/cohuck/qemu/-/jobs/1178409540
> >
> > Ilya Leoshkevich (4):
> > target/s390x: Fix translation exception on illegal instruction
> > target/arm: Make sure that commpage's tb->size != 0
> > target/xtensa: Make sure that tb->size != 0
> > accel/tcg: Assert that tb->size != 0 after translation
> >
> > accel/tcg/translate-all.c | 1 +
> > target/arm/translate.c | 1 +
> > target/s390x/translate.c | 16 +++++++++++-----
> > target/xtensa/translate.c | 3 +++
> > 4 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> >
>
> FWIW, this now has passed CI for me.
>
> If all is good, who will merge it? I can merge through the s390x
> tree,
> if I get acks on the patches for the other architectures, or I can
> give
> my ack on the s390x patch, if somebody else is going to take it.
For me personally it would be totally fine if it goes through your
tree. We still need a review on the ARM patch though.