On 14.04.21 19:03, Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito wrote:
> The only limitation here is that running a script with gdbserver
> will make the test output mismatch with the expected
> results, making the test fail.
>
> Signed-off-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
> ---
> tests/qemu-iotests/common.rc | 8 +++++++-
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/tests/qemu-iotests/common.rc b/tests/qemu-iotests/common.rc
> index 65cdba5723..53a3310fee 100644
> --- a/tests/qemu-iotests/common.rc
> +++ b/tests/qemu-iotests/common.rc
> @@ -166,8 +166,14 @@ _qemu_wrapper()
> if [ -n "${QEMU_NEED_PID}" ]; then
> echo $BASHPID > "${QEMU_TEST_DIR}/qemu-${_QEMU_HANDLE}.pid"
> fi
> +
> + GDB="${QEMU_PROG}"
> + if [ ! -z ${GDB_QEMU} ]; then
> + GDB="gdbserver ${GDB_QEMU} ${GDB}"
> + fi
> +
> VALGRIND_QEMU="${VALGRIND_QEMU_VM}" _qemu_proc_exec "${VALGRIND_LOGFILE}" \
> - "$QEMU_PROG" $QEMU_OPTIONS "$@"
> + $GDB $QEMU_OPTIONS "$@"
This looks strange, because now there is no qemu here.
Why not just fill $GDB with the GDB options, keeping it empty if no gdb
is to be used? Then we’d have
VALGRIND_QEMU=... ... \
$GDB "$QEMU_PROG" $QEMU_OPTIONS "$@"
here.
(Also, the indentation changed. I’d keep it aligned to four spaces.)
Max
> )
> RETVAL=$?
> _qemu_proc_valgrind_log "${VALGRIND_LOGFILE}" $RETVAL
>