On 18/03/21 17:02, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote:
> Even the name of this section is 'cpu/msr_hyperv_hypercall',
> 'hypercall_hypercall' is clearly a typo.
>
> Signed-off-by: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>
> ---
> target/i386/machine.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/target/i386/machine.c b/target/i386/machine.c
> index a4777a73b0a9..715620c58809 100644
> --- a/target/i386/machine.c
> +++ b/target/i386/machine.c
> @@ -706,7 +706,7 @@ static bool hyperv_hypercall_enable_needed(void *opaque)
> return env->msr_hv_hypercall != 0 || env->msr_hv_guest_os_id != 0;
> }
>
> -static const VMStateDescription vmstate_msr_hypercall_hypercall = {
> +static const VMStateDescription vmstate_msr_hyperv_hypercall = {
> .name = "cpu/msr_hyperv_hypercall",
> .version_id = 1,
> .minimum_version_id = 1,
> @@ -1487,7 +1487,7 @@ VMStateDescription vmstate_x86_cpu = {
> &vmstate_msr_architectural_pmu,
> &vmstate_mpx,
> #ifdef CONFIG_KVM
> - &vmstate_msr_hypercall_hypercall,
> + &vmstate_msr_hyperv_hypercall,
> &vmstate_msr_hyperv_vapic,
> &vmstate_msr_hyperv_time,
> &vmstate_msr_hyperv_crash,
>
Queued, thanks.
Paolo