docs/system/arm/nuvoton.rst | 2 +- hw/arm/npcm7xx.c | 45 ++- hw/arm/npcm7xx_boards.c | 99 ++++++ hw/misc/meson.build | 1 + hw/misc/npcm7xx_mft.c | 540 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ hw/misc/npcm7xx_pwm.c | 4 + hw/misc/trace-events | 8 + include/hw/arm/npcm7xx.h | 13 +- include/hw/misc/npcm7xx_mft.h | 70 +++++ include/hw/misc/npcm7xx_pwm.h | 4 +- tests/qtest/npcm7xx_pwm-test.c | 205 ++++++++++++- 11 files changed, 974 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-) create mode 100644 hw/misc/npcm7xx_mft.c create mode 100644 include/hw/misc/npcm7xx_mft.h
This patch set implements the Tachometer (a.k.a Multi Functional Timer/MFT) device in NPCM7XX SoC. This device is used by NPCM7XX boards to measure the RPM of PWM fans. To provide the RPM of a certain fan, since RPM = MAX_RPM * duty_percentage. We convert the duty output in NPCM7XX PWM module into GPIOs and feed them into the MFT module. The connection of PWM modules and fan modules are derived from their specific Linux device trees and coded in hw/arm/npcm7xx_boards.c. We amend the QTest for the PWM module to include verifying the reading from the Tachometer is correct. Changes since v1: - Split implementation of device and addition to board file to separate patches - Adapt to new Clock API and address conflicts - Use the new clock_ns_to_ticks API to calculate tachometer counts Hao Wu (5): hw/misc: Add GPIOs for duty in NPCM7xx PWM hw/misc: Add NPCM7XX MFT Module hw/arm: Add MFT device to NPCM7xx Soc hw/arm: Connect PWM fans in NPCM7XX boards tests/qtest: Test PWM fan RPM using MFT in PWM test docs/system/arm/nuvoton.rst | 2 +- hw/arm/npcm7xx.c | 45 ++- hw/arm/npcm7xx_boards.c | 99 ++++++ hw/misc/meson.build | 1 + hw/misc/npcm7xx_mft.c | 540 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ hw/misc/npcm7xx_pwm.c | 4 + hw/misc/trace-events | 8 + include/hw/arm/npcm7xx.h | 13 +- include/hw/misc/npcm7xx_mft.h | 70 +++++ include/hw/misc/npcm7xx_pwm.h | 4 +- tests/qtest/npcm7xx_pwm-test.c | 205 ++++++++++++- 11 files changed, 974 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-) create mode 100644 hw/misc/npcm7xx_mft.c create mode 100644 include/hw/misc/npcm7xx_mft.h -- 2.31.0.rc2.261.g7f71774620-goog
On Thu, 11 Mar 2021 at 18:08, Hao Wu <wuhaotsh@google.com> wrote: > > This patch set implements the Tachometer (a.k.a Multi Functional Timer/MFT) > device in NPCM7XX SoC. This device is used by NPCM7XX boards to measure > the RPM of PWM fans. > > To provide the RPM of a certain fan, since RPM = MAX_RPM * duty_percentage. > We convert the duty output in NPCM7XX PWM module into GPIOs and feed them > into the MFT module. > > The connection of PWM modules and fan modules are derived from their specific > Linux device trees and coded in hw/arm/npcm7xx_boards.c. > > We amend the QTest for the PWM module to include verifying the reading from > the Tachometer is correct. Applied to target-arm.next, thanks. -- PMM
On Thu, 11 Mar 2021 at 13:11, Hao Wu <wuhaotsh@google.com> wrote: > > This patch set implements the Tachometer (a.k.a Multi Functional Timer/MFT) > device in NPCM7XX SoC. This device is used by NPCM7XX boards to measure > the RPM of PWM fans. > > To provide the RPM of a certain fan, since RPM = MAX_RPM * duty_percentage. > We convert the duty output in NPCM7XX PWM module into GPIOs and feed them > into the MFT module. > > The connection of PWM modules and fan modules are derived from their specific > Linux device trees and coded in hw/arm/npcm7xx_boards.c. > > We amend the QTest for the PWM module to include verifying the reading from > the Tachometer is correct. > > Changes since v1: > - Split implementation of device and addition to board file to separate patches > - Adapt to new Clock API and address conflicts > - Use the new clock_ns_to_ticks API to calculate tachometer counts > > Hao Wu (5): > hw/misc: Add GPIOs for duty in NPCM7xx PWM > hw/misc: Add NPCM7XX MFT Module > hw/arm: Add MFT device to NPCM7xx Soc > hw/arm: Connect PWM fans in NPCM7XX boards > tests/qtest: Test PWM fan RPM using MFT in PWM test > > docs/system/arm/nuvoton.rst | 2 +- > hw/arm/npcm7xx.c | 45 ++- > hw/arm/npcm7xx_boards.c | 99 ++++++ > hw/misc/meson.build | 1 + > hw/misc/npcm7xx_mft.c | 540 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > hw/misc/npcm7xx_pwm.c | 4 + > hw/misc/trace-events | 8 + > include/hw/arm/npcm7xx.h | 13 +- > include/hw/misc/npcm7xx_mft.h | 70 +++++ > include/hw/misc/npcm7xx_pwm.h | 4 +- > tests/qtest/npcm7xx_pwm-test.c | 205 ++++++++++++- > 11 files changed, 974 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-) > create mode 100644 hw/misc/npcm7xx_mft.c > create mode 100644 include/hw/misc/npcm7xx_mft.h Thanks, queued to target-arm.next. r~
Is this reply to a wrong thread? I thought it was applied a long time ago. Thanks, On Mon, Nov 1, 2021 at 10:33 AM Richard Henderson < richard.henderson@linaro.org> wrote: > On Thu, 11 Mar 2021 at 13:11, Hao Wu <wuhaotsh@google.com> wrote: > > > > This patch set implements the Tachometer (a.k.a Multi Functional > Timer/MFT) > > device in NPCM7XX SoC. This device is used by NPCM7XX boards to measure > > the RPM of PWM fans. > > > > To provide the RPM of a certain fan, since RPM = MAX_RPM * > duty_percentage. > > We convert the duty output in NPCM7XX PWM module into GPIOs and feed them > > into the MFT module. > > > > The connection of PWM modules and fan modules are derived from their > specific > > Linux device trees and coded in hw/arm/npcm7xx_boards.c. > > > > We amend the QTest for the PWM module to include verifying the reading > from > > the Tachometer is correct. > > > > Changes since v1: > > - Split implementation of device and addition to board file to separate > patches > > - Adapt to new Clock API and address conflicts > > - Use the new clock_ns_to_ticks API to calculate tachometer counts > > > > Hao Wu (5): > > hw/misc: Add GPIOs for duty in NPCM7xx PWM > > hw/misc: Add NPCM7XX MFT Module > > hw/arm: Add MFT device to NPCM7xx Soc > > hw/arm: Connect PWM fans in NPCM7XX boards > > tests/qtest: Test PWM fan RPM using MFT in PWM test > > > > docs/system/arm/nuvoton.rst | 2 +- > > hw/arm/npcm7xx.c | 45 ++- > > hw/arm/npcm7xx_boards.c | 99 ++++++ > > hw/misc/meson.build | 1 + > > hw/misc/npcm7xx_mft.c | 540 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > hw/misc/npcm7xx_pwm.c | 4 + > > hw/misc/trace-events | 8 + > > include/hw/arm/npcm7xx.h | 13 +- > > include/hw/misc/npcm7xx_mft.h | 70 +++++ > > include/hw/misc/npcm7xx_pwm.h | 4 +- > > tests/qtest/npcm7xx_pwm-test.c | 205 ++++++++++++- > > 11 files changed, 974 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-) > > create mode 100644 hw/misc/npcm7xx_mft.c > > create mode 100644 include/hw/misc/npcm7xx_mft.h > > Thanks, queued to target-arm.next. > > r~ >
On 11/1/21 1:50 PM, Hao Wu wrote: > Is this reply to a wrong thread? I thought it was applied a long time ago. Probably. r~ > > Thanks, > > On Mon, Nov 1, 2021 at 10:33 AM Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org > <mailto:richard.henderson@linaro.org>> wrote: > > On Thu, 11 Mar 2021 at 13:11, Hao Wu <wuhaotsh@google.com > <mailto:wuhaotsh@google.com>> wrote: > > > > This patch set implements the Tachometer (a.k.a Multi Functional Timer/MFT) > > device in NPCM7XX SoC. This device is used by NPCM7XX boards to measure > > the RPM of PWM fans. > > > > To provide the RPM of a certain fan, since RPM = MAX_RPM * duty_percentage. > > We convert the duty output in NPCM7XX PWM module into GPIOs and feed them > > into the MFT module. > > > > The connection of PWM modules and fan modules are derived from their specific > > Linux device trees and coded in hw/arm/npcm7xx_boards.c. > > > > We amend the QTest for the PWM module to include verifying the reading from > > the Tachometer is correct. > > > > Changes since v1: > > - Split implementation of device and addition to board file to separate patches > > - Adapt to new Clock API and address conflicts > > - Use the new clock_ns_to_ticks API to calculate tachometer counts > > > > Hao Wu (5): > > hw/misc: Add GPIOs for duty in NPCM7xx PWM > > hw/misc: Add NPCM7XX MFT Module > > hw/arm: Add MFT device to NPCM7xx Soc > > hw/arm: Connect PWM fans in NPCM7XX boards > > tests/qtest: Test PWM fan RPM using MFT in PWM test > > > > docs/system/arm/nuvoton.rst | 2 +- > > hw/arm/npcm7xx.c | 45 ++- > > hw/arm/npcm7xx_boards.c | 99 ++++++ > > hw/misc/meson.build | 1 + > > hw/misc/npcm7xx_mft.c | 540 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > hw/misc/npcm7xx_pwm.c | 4 + > > hw/misc/trace-events | 8 + > > include/hw/arm/npcm7xx.h | 13 +- > > include/hw/misc/npcm7xx_mft.h | 70 +++++ > > include/hw/misc/npcm7xx_pwm.h | 4 +- > > tests/qtest/npcm7xx_pwm-test.c | 205 ++++++++++++- > > 11 files changed, 974 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-) > > create mode 100644 hw/misc/npcm7xx_mft.c > > create mode 100644 include/hw/misc/npcm7xx_mft.h > > Thanks, queued to target-arm.next. > > r~ >
On Tue, 2 Nov 2021 at 10:03, Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org> wrote: > > On 11/1/21 1:50 PM, Hao Wu wrote: > > Is this reply to a wrong thread? I thought it was applied a long time ago. > > Probably. Possibly you meant this 5-patch NPCM7xx series ? https://patchew.org/QEMU/20211008002628.1958285-1-wuhaotsh@google.com/ ("[PATCH v2 0/5] hw/arm: Add MMC device for NPCM7XX boards") which has been reviewed and is ready to go in I think. thanks -- PMM
On 11/2/21 6:44 AM, Peter Maydell wrote: > On Tue, 2 Nov 2021 at 10:03, Richard Henderson > <richard.henderson@linaro.org> wrote: >> >> On 11/1/21 1:50 PM, Hao Wu wrote: >>> Is this reply to a wrong thread? I thought it was applied a long time ago. >> >> Probably. > > Possibly you meant this 5-patch NPCM7xx series ? > https://patchew.org/QEMU/20211008002628.1958285-1-wuhaotsh@google.com/ > ("[PATCH v2 0/5] hw/arm: Add MMC device for NPCM7XX boards") > > which has been reviewed and is ready to go in I think. Yep, that's the one. r~
© 2016 - 2024 Red Hat, Inc.