There is only one call to pflash_register_memory() with
rom_mode == false. As we want to modify pflash_register_memory()
in the next patch, open-code this trivial function in place for
the 'rom_mode == false' case.

Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
---
 hw/block/pflash_cfi02.c | 6 ++++--
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/hw/block/pflash_cfi02.c b/hw/block/pflash_cfi02.c
index 5f949b4c792..4efbae2f0c9 100644
--- a/hw/block/pflash_cfi02.c
+++ b/hw/block/pflash_cfi02.c
@@ -467,8 +467,10 @@ static void pflash_write(void *opaque, hwaddr offset, uint64_t value,
     switch (pfl->wcycle) {
     case 0:
         /* Set the device in I/O access mode if required */
-        if (pfl->rom_mode)
-            pflash_register_memory(pfl, 0);
+        if (pfl->rom_mode) {
+            pfl->rom_mode = false;
+            memory_region_rom_device_set_romd(&pfl->orig_mem, false);
+        }
         pfl->read_counter = 0;
         /* We're in read mode */
     check_unlock0:
-- 
2.26.2

On Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at 7:51 AM Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
<philmd@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> There is only one call to pflash_register_memory() with
> rom_mode == false. As we want to modify pflash_register_memory()
> in the next patch, open-code this trivial function in place for
> the 'rom_mode == false' case.
>
> Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
> ---
>  hw/block/pflash_cfi02.c | 6 ++++--
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>

Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>