[PATCH] hw/arm/xlnx-zynqmp: Remove obsolete 'has_rpu' property

Philippe Mathieu-Daudé posted 1 patch 3 years, 2 months ago
Test checkpatch passed
Patches applied successfully (tree, apply log)
git fetch https://github.com/patchew-project/qemu tags/patchew/20210219115123.1938686-1-f4bug@amsat.org
There is a newer version of this series
include/hw/arm/xlnx-zynqmp.h | 2 --
hw/arm/xlnx-zynqmp.c         | 6 ------
2 files changed, 8 deletions(-)
[PATCH] hw/arm/xlnx-zynqmp: Remove obsolete 'has_rpu' property
Posted by Philippe Mathieu-Daudé 3 years, 2 months ago
We hint the 'has_rpu' property is no longer required since commit
6908ec448b4 ("xlnx-zynqmp: Properly support the smp command line
option") which was released in QEMU v2.11.0.

3 years later we feel safe enough to remove it without using the
usual deprecation policy.

Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org>
---
 include/hw/arm/xlnx-zynqmp.h | 2 --
 hw/arm/xlnx-zynqmp.c         | 6 ------
 2 files changed, 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/hw/arm/xlnx-zynqmp.h b/include/hw/arm/xlnx-zynqmp.h
index 6f45387a173..0678b419a23 100644
--- a/include/hw/arm/xlnx-zynqmp.h
+++ b/include/hw/arm/xlnx-zynqmp.h
@@ -115,8 +115,6 @@ struct XlnxZynqMPState {
     bool secure;
     /* Has the ARM Virtualization extensions?  */
     bool virt;
-    /* Has the RPU subsystem?  */
-    bool has_rpu;
 
     /* CAN bus. */
     CanBusState *canbus[XLNX_ZYNQMP_NUM_CAN];
diff --git a/hw/arm/xlnx-zynqmp.c b/hw/arm/xlnx-zynqmp.c
index 881847255b4..46030c1ef81 100644
--- a/hw/arm/xlnx-zynqmp.c
+++ b/hw/arm/xlnx-zynqmp.c
@@ -443,11 +443,6 @@ static void xlnx_zynqmp_realize(DeviceState *dev, Error **errp)
         }
     }
 
-    if (s->has_rpu) {
-        info_report("The 'has_rpu' property is no longer required, to use the "
-                    "RPUs just use -smp 6.");
-    }
-
     xlnx_zynqmp_create_rpu(ms, s, boot_cpu, &err);
     if (err) {
         error_propagate(errp, err);
@@ -646,7 +641,6 @@ static Property xlnx_zynqmp_props[] = {
     DEFINE_PROP_STRING("boot-cpu", XlnxZynqMPState, boot_cpu),
     DEFINE_PROP_BOOL("secure", XlnxZynqMPState, secure, false),
     DEFINE_PROP_BOOL("virtualization", XlnxZynqMPState, virt, false),
-    DEFINE_PROP_BOOL("has_rpu", XlnxZynqMPState, has_rpu, false),
     DEFINE_PROP_LINK("ddr-ram", XlnxZynqMPState, ddr_ram, TYPE_MEMORY_REGION,
                      MemoryRegion *),
     DEFINE_PROP_LINK("canbus0", XlnxZynqMPState, canbus[0], TYPE_CAN_BUS,
-- 
2.26.2

Re: [PATCH] hw/arm/xlnx-zynqmp: Remove obsolete 'has_rpu' property
Posted by Peter Maydell 3 years, 2 months ago
On Fri, 19 Feb 2021 at 11:51, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org> wrote:
>
> We hint the 'has_rpu' property is no longer required since commit
> 6908ec448b4 ("xlnx-zynqmp: Properly support the smp command line
> option") which was released in QEMU v2.11.0.
>
> 3 years later we feel safe enough to remove it without using the
> usual deprecation policy.

This device is marked user_creatable = false, so the only thing
that could be setting the property is the board code that creates
the device. So the property is not user-facing and we can remove it
without going through the deprecation process.

Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
(maybe noting the above in the commit message).

thanks
-- PMM

Re: [PATCH] hw/arm/xlnx-zynqmp: Remove obsolete 'has_rpu' property
Posted by Philippe Mathieu-Daudé 3 years, 2 months ago
On 2/19/21 12:58 PM, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On Fri, 19 Feb 2021 at 11:51, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org> wrote:
>>
>> We hint the 'has_rpu' property is no longer required since commit
>> 6908ec448b4 ("xlnx-zynqmp: Properly support the smp command line
>> option") which was released in QEMU v2.11.0.
>>
>> 3 years later we feel safe enough to remove it without using the
>> usual deprecation policy.
> 
> This device is marked user_creatable = false, so the only thing
> that could be setting the property is the board code that creates
> the device. So the property is not user-facing and we can remove it
> without going through the deprecation process.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
> (maybe noting the above in the commit message).

OK I'll update, thanks!