From: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>

When compiling with -Werror=implicit-fallthrough, gcc complains about
missing fallthrough annotations in this file. Looking at the code,
the fallthrough is very likely intended here, so add some comments
to silence the compiler warnings.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Message-id: 20201020105938.23209-1-thuth@redhat.com
Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
---
 hw/arm/highbank.c | 2 ++
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

diff --git a/hw/arm/highbank.c b/hw/arm/highbank.c
index da0510d7cef..f71087860d0 100644
--- a/hw/arm/highbank.c
+++ b/hw/arm/highbank.c
@@ -92,10 +92,12 @@ static void hb_reset_secondary(ARMCPU *cpu, const struct arm_boot_info *info)
         address_space_stl_notdirty(&address_space_memory,
                                    SMP_BOOT_REG + 0x30, 0,
                                    MEMTXATTRS_UNSPECIFIED, NULL);
+        /* fallthrough */
     case 3:
         address_space_stl_notdirty(&address_space_memory,
                                    SMP_BOOT_REG + 0x20, 0,
                                    MEMTXATTRS_UNSPECIFIED, NULL);
+        /* fallthrough */
     case 2:
         address_space_stl_notdirty(&address_space_memory,
                                    SMP_BOOT_REG + 0x10, 0,
-- 
2.20.1