qom/object.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
Fix typo introduced in the C11 #ifdef for qemu_max_align_t. It
never caused any problems because we always compile using
-std=gnu99.
Fixes: 4c880f363e9e ("qom: Allow objects to be allocated with increased alignment")
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>
---
qom/object.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/qom/object.c b/qom/object.c
index c335dce7e4..125dabd28b 100644
--- a/qom/object.c
+++ b/qom/object.c
@@ -692,7 +692,7 @@ static void object_finalize(void *data)
/* Find the minimum alignment guaranteed by the system malloc. */
#if __STDC_VERSION__ >= 201112L
-typddef max_align_t qemu_max_align_t;
+typedef max_align_t qemu_max_align_t;
#else
typedef union {
long l;
--
2.26.2
On Thu, Oct 8, 2020 at 2:04 AM Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com> wrote:
> Fix typo introduced in the C11 #ifdef for qemu_max_align_t. It
> never caused any problems because we always compile using
> -std=gnu99.
>
> Fixes: 4c880f363e9e ("qom: Allow objects to be allocated with increased
> alignment")
> Signed-off-by: Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>
>
Reviewed-by: Marc-André Lureau <marcandre.lureau@redhat.com>
> ---
> qom/object.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/qom/object.c b/qom/object.c
> index c335dce7e4..125dabd28b 100644
> --- a/qom/object.c
> +++ b/qom/object.c
> @@ -692,7 +692,7 @@ static void object_finalize(void *data)
>
> /* Find the minimum alignment guaranteed by the system malloc. */
> #if __STDC_VERSION__ >= 201112L
> -typddef max_align_t qemu_max_align_t;
> +typedef max_align_t qemu_max_align_t;
> #else
> typedef union {
> long l;
> --
> 2.26.2
>
>
>
--
Marc-André Lureau
On 10/8/20 12:02 AM, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
> Fix typo introduced in the C11 #ifdef for qemu_max_align_t. It
> never caused any problems because we always compile using
> -std=gnu99.
>
> Fixes: 4c880f363e9e ("qom: Allow objects to be allocated with increased alignment")
> Signed-off-by: Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>
> ---
> qom/object.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/qom/object.c b/qom/object.c
> index c335dce7e4..125dabd28b 100644
> --- a/qom/object.c
> +++ b/qom/object.c
> @@ -692,7 +692,7 @@ static void object_finalize(void *data)
>
> /* Find the minimum alignment guaranteed by the system malloc. */
> #if __STDC_VERSION__ >= 201112L
> -typddef max_align_t qemu_max_align_t;
> +typedef max_align_t qemu_max_align_t;
Oops
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
> #else
> typedef union {
> long l;
>
Le 08/10/2020 à 00:02, Eduardo Habkost a écrit :
> Fix typo introduced in the C11 #ifdef for qemu_max_align_t. It
> never caused any problems because we always compile using
> -std=gnu99.
>
> Fixes: 4c880f363e9e ("qom: Allow objects to be allocated with increased alignment")
> Signed-off-by: Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>
> ---
> qom/object.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/qom/object.c b/qom/object.c
> index c335dce7e4..125dabd28b 100644
> --- a/qom/object.c
> +++ b/qom/object.c
> @@ -692,7 +692,7 @@ static void object_finalize(void *data)
>
> /* Find the minimum alignment guaranteed by the system malloc. */
> #if __STDC_VERSION__ >= 201112L
> -typddef max_align_t qemu_max_align_t;
> +typedef max_align_t qemu_max_align_t;
> #else
> typedef union {
> long l;
>
Applied to my trivial-patches branch.
Thanks,
Laurent
On Wed, Oct 07, 2020 at 06:02:55PM -0400, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
> Fix typo introduced in the C11 #ifdef for qemu_max_align_t. It
> never caused any problems because we always compile using
> -std=gnu99.
>
> Fixes: 4c880f363e9e ("qom: Allow objects to be allocated with increased alignment")
> Signed-off-by: Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>
> ---
> qom/object.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/qom/object.c b/qom/object.c
> index c335dce7e4..125dabd28b 100644
> --- a/qom/object.c
> +++ b/qom/object.c
> @@ -692,7 +692,7 @@ static void object_finalize(void *data)
>
> /* Find the minimum alignment guaranteed by the system malloc. */
> #if __STDC_VERSION__ >= 201112L
> -typddef max_align_t qemu_max_align_t;
> +typedef max_align_t qemu_max_align_t;
> #else
Why do we need / have this first part of the #if at all ? We
unconditionally add -std=gnu99, so surely this has always
been dead code and can just be better deleted.
> typedef union {
> long l;
> --
> 2.26.2
>
Regards,
Daniel
--
|: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
|: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
|: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|
On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at 03:45:12PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 07, 2020 at 06:02:55PM -0400, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
> > Fix typo introduced in the C11 #ifdef for qemu_max_align_t. It
> > never caused any problems because we always compile using
> > -std=gnu99.
> >
> > Fixes: 4c880f363e9e ("qom: Allow objects to be allocated with increased alignment")
> > Signed-off-by: Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>
> > ---
> > qom/object.c | 2 +-
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/qom/object.c b/qom/object.c
> > index c335dce7e4..125dabd28b 100644
> > --- a/qom/object.c
> > +++ b/qom/object.c
> > @@ -692,7 +692,7 @@ static void object_finalize(void *data)
> >
> > /* Find the minimum alignment guaranteed by the system malloc. */
> > #if __STDC_VERSION__ >= 201112L
> > -typddef max_align_t qemu_max_align_t;
> > +typedef max_align_t qemu_max_align_t;
> > #else
>
> Why do we need / have this first part of the #if at all ? We
> unconditionally add -std=gnu99, so surely this has always
> been dead code and can just be better deleted.
It has the same function as a comment saying "we can use
max_align_t as soon as we move to C11". The difference is that
it doesn't need us to manually change the code once we do.
--
Eduardo
Le 12/10/2020 à 16:45, Daniel P. Berrangé a écrit :
> On Wed, Oct 07, 2020 at 06:02:55PM -0400, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
>> Fix typo introduced in the C11 #ifdef for qemu_max_align_t. It
>> never caused any problems because we always compile using
>> -std=gnu99.
>>
>> Fixes: 4c880f363e9e ("qom: Allow objects to be allocated with increased alignment")
>> Signed-off-by: Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>
>> ---
>> qom/object.c | 2 +-
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/qom/object.c b/qom/object.c
>> index c335dce7e4..125dabd28b 100644
>> --- a/qom/object.c
>> +++ b/qom/object.c
>> @@ -692,7 +692,7 @@ static void object_finalize(void *data)
>>
>> /* Find the minimum alignment guaranteed by the system malloc. */
>> #if __STDC_VERSION__ >= 201112L
>> -typddef max_align_t qemu_max_align_t;
>> +typedef max_align_t qemu_max_align_t;
>> #else
>
> Why do we need / have this first part of the #if at all ? We
> unconditionally add -std=gnu99, so surely this has always
> been dead code and can just be better deleted.
>
I've removed the patch from my queue.
But perhaps it will be needed in the future if we switch to a newer
standard version?
Thanks,
Laurent
© 2016 - 2026 Red Hat, Inc.