[v1] fix some comment spelling errors

[PATCH RFC 05/14] tricore/: fix some comment spelling errors

zhaolichang posted 14 patches 5 years, 4 months ago

Diff against v1 v2 v2 v2 v3
Download mbox

Maintainers: Sunil Muthuswamy <sunilmut@microsoft.com>, Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>, Wenchao Wang <wenchao.wang@intel.com>, Laurent Vivier <laurent@vivier.eu>, Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.ibm.com>, Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>, Guan Xuetao <gxt@mprc.pku.edu.cn>, Sagar Karandikar <sagark@eecs.berkeley.edu>, Sarah Harris <S.E.Harris@kent.ac.uk>, Colin Xu <colin.xu@intel.com>, Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>, Aleksandar Markovic <aleksandar.qemu.devel@gmail.com>, David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>, Aurelien Jarno <aurelien@aurel32.net>, Aleksandar Rikalo <aleksandar.rikalo@syrmia.com>, Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>, Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>, Bastian Koppelmann <kbastian@mail.uni-paderborn.de>, Jiaxun Yang <jiaxun.yang@flygoat.com>, Alistair Francis <Alistair.Francis@wdc.com>, Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>, Michael Rolnik <mrolnik@gmail.com>, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>, Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net>, Artyom Tarasenko <atar4qemu@gmail.com>, Mark Cave-Ayland <mark.cave-ayland@ilande.co.uk>, Stafford Horne <shorne@gmail.com>, Yoshinori Sato <ysato@users.sourceforge.jp>, David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>, "Edgar E. Iglesias" <edgar.iglesias@gmail.com>, Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>

There is a newer version of this series

Expand all Fold all

[PATCH RFC 05/14] tricore/: fix some comment spelling errors

Posted by zhaolichang 5 years, 4 months ago

I found that there are many spelling errors in the comments of qemu/target/tricore.
I used spellcheck to check the spelling errors and found some errors in the folder.

Signed-off-by: zhaolichang <zhaolichang@huawei.com>
---
 target/s390x/ioinst.c      | 2 +-
 target/tricore/csfr.def    | 2 +-
 target/tricore/translate.c | 2 +-
 3 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/target/s390x/ioinst.c b/target/s390x/ioinst.c
index a412926..c576d85 100644
--- a/target/s390x/ioinst.c
+++ b/target/s390x/ioinst.c
@@ -279,7 +279,7 @@ void ioinst_handle_stsch(S390CPU *cpu, uint64_t reg1, uint32_t ipb,
         /*
          * As operand exceptions have a lower priority than access exceptions,
          * we check whether the memory area is writeable (injecting the
-         * access execption if it is not) first.
+         * access exception if it is not) first.
          */
         if (!s390_cpu_virt_mem_check_write(cpu, addr, ar, sizeof(schib))) {
             s390_program_interrupt(env, PGM_OPERAND, ra);
diff --git a/target/tricore/csfr.def b/target/tricore/csfr.def
index ff004cb..cdfaf1d 100644
--- a/target/tricore/csfr.def
+++ b/target/tricore/csfr.def
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-/* A(ll) access permited
+/* A(ll) access permitted
    R(ead only) access
    E(nd init protected) access
 
diff --git a/target/tricore/translate.c b/target/tricore/translate.c
index 7752630..c9c420d 100644
--- a/target/tricore/translate.c
+++ b/target/tricore/translate.c
@@ -397,7 +397,7 @@ static inline void gen_mfcr(DisasContext *ctx, TCGv ret, int32_t offset)
 #undef E
 
 #define R(ADDRESS, REG, FEATURE) /* don't gen writes to read-only reg,
-                                    since no execption occurs */
+                                    since no exception occurs */
 #define A(ADDRESS, REG, FEATURE) R(ADDRESS, REG, FEATURE)                \
     case ADDRESS:                                                        \
         if (has_feature(ctx, FEATURE)) {                             \
-- 
2.26.2.windows.1

Re: [PATCH RFC 05/14] tricore/: fix some comment spelling errors

Posted by David Edmondson 5 years, 4 months ago

On Wednesday, 2020-09-30 at 17:53:12 +08, zhaolichang wrote:

> I found that there are many spelling errors in the comments of qemu/target/tricore.
> I used spellcheck to check the spelling errors and found some errors in the folder.
>
> Signed-off-by: zhaolichang <zhaolichang@huawei.com>

Reviewed-by: David Edmondson <david.edmondson@oracle.com>

> ---
>  target/s390x/ioinst.c      | 2 +-
>  target/tricore/csfr.def    | 2 +-
>  target/tricore/translate.c | 2 +-
>  3 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/target/s390x/ioinst.c b/target/s390x/ioinst.c
> index a412926..c576d85 100644
> --- a/target/s390x/ioinst.c
> +++ b/target/s390x/ioinst.c
> @@ -279,7 +279,7 @@ void ioinst_handle_stsch(S390CPU *cpu, uint64_t reg1, uint32_t ipb,
>          /*
>           * As operand exceptions have a lower priority than access exceptions,
>           * we check whether the memory area is writeable (injecting the
> -         * access execption if it is not) first.
> +         * access exception if it is not) first.
>           */
>          if (!s390_cpu_virt_mem_check_write(cpu, addr, ar, sizeof(schib))) {
>              s390_program_interrupt(env, PGM_OPERAND, ra);
> diff --git a/target/tricore/csfr.def b/target/tricore/csfr.def
> index ff004cb..cdfaf1d 100644
> --- a/target/tricore/csfr.def
> +++ b/target/tricore/csfr.def
> @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
> -/* A(ll) access permited
> +/* A(ll) access permitted
>     R(ead only) access
>     E(nd init protected) access
>  
> diff --git a/target/tricore/translate.c b/target/tricore/translate.c
> index 7752630..c9c420d 100644
> --- a/target/tricore/translate.c
> +++ b/target/tricore/translate.c
> @@ -397,7 +397,7 @@ static inline void gen_mfcr(DisasContext *ctx, TCGv ret, int32_t offset)
>  #undef E
>  
>  #define R(ADDRESS, REG, FEATURE) /* don't gen writes to read-only reg,
> -                                    since no execption occurs */
> +                                    since no exception occurs */
>  #define A(ADDRESS, REG, FEATURE) R(ADDRESS, REG, FEATURE)                \
>      case ADDRESS:                                                        \
>          if (has_feature(ctx, FEATURE)) {                             \
> -- 
> 2.26.2.windows.1

dme.
-- 
If I could buy my reasoning, I'd pay to lose.