Instead of initializing one MSIX IRQ with the generic
qemu_vfio_pci_init_irq() function, use the MSIX specific one which
will allow us to use multiple IRQs. For now we provide an array of
a single IRQ.

Reviewed-by: Fam Zheng <fam@euphon.net>
Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
---
 block/nvme.c | 9 +++++++--
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/block/nvme.c b/block/nvme.c
index f4f27b6da7d..e6dac027f72 100644
--- a/block/nvme.c
+++ b/block/nvme.c
@@ -694,6 +694,7 @@ static int nvme_init(BlockDriverState *bs, const char *device, int namespace,
     uint64_t timeout_ms;
     uint64_t deadline, now;
     Error *local_err = NULL;
+    unsigned irq_count = MSIX_IRQ_COUNT;
 
     qemu_co_mutex_init(&s->dma_map_lock);
     qemu_co_queue_init(&s->dma_flush_queue);
@@ -779,9 +780,13 @@ static int nvme_init(BlockDriverState *bs, const char *device, int namespace,
         }
     }
 
-    ret = qemu_vfio_pci_init_irq(s->vfio, s->irq_notifier,
-                                 VFIO_PCI_MSIX_IRQ_INDEX, errp);
+    ret = qemu_vfio_pci_init_msix_irqs(s->vfio, s->irq_notifier,
+                                       &irq_count, errp);
     if (ret) {
+        if (ret == -EOVERFLOW) {
+            error_append_hint(errp, "%u IRQs requested but only %u available\n",
+                              MSIX_IRQ_COUNT, irq_count);
+        }
         goto out;
     }
     aio_set_event_notifier(bdrv_get_aio_context(bs),
-- 
2.26.2

On Wed, Sep 09, 2020 at 04:23:54PM +0200, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> Instead of initializing one MSIX IRQ with the generic
> qemu_vfio_pci_init_irq() function, use the MSIX specific one which
> will allow us to use multiple IRQs. For now we provide an array of
> a single IRQ.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Fam Zheng <fam@euphon.net>
> Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
> ---
>  block/nvme.c | 9 +++++++--
>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

Reviewed-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>