In preparation of using multiple IRQ (thus multiple eventfds)
make BDRVNVMeState::irq_notifier an array (for now of a single
element, the admin queue notifier).
Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
---
block/nvme.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++++----------
1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/block/nvme.c b/block/nvme.c
index a61e86a83eb..cdd16d451e7 100644
--- a/block/nvme.c
+++ b/block/nvme.c
@@ -106,6 +106,9 @@ QEMU_BUILD_BUG_ON(offsetof(NVMeRegs, doorbells) != 0x1000);
#define INDEX_ADMIN 0
#define INDEX_IO(n) (1 + n)
+/* This driver shares a single MSIX IRQ for the admin and I/O queues */
+#define MSIX_IRQ_COUNT 1
+
struct BDRVNVMeState {
AioContext *aio_context;
QEMUVFIOState *vfio;
@@ -120,7 +123,7 @@ struct BDRVNVMeState {
/* How many uint32_t elements does each doorbell entry take. */
size_t doorbell_scale;
bool write_cache_supported;
- EventNotifier irq_notifier;
+ EventNotifier irq_notifier[MSIX_IRQ_COUNT];
uint64_t nsze; /* Namespace size reported by identify command */
int nsid; /* The namespace id to read/write data. */
@@ -631,7 +634,8 @@ static bool nvme_poll_queues(BDRVNVMeState *s)
static void nvme_handle_event(EventNotifier *n)
{
- BDRVNVMeState *s = container_of(n, BDRVNVMeState, irq_notifier);
+ BDRVNVMeState *s = container_of(n, BDRVNVMeState,
+ irq_notifier[INDEX_ADMIN]);
trace_nvme_handle_event(s);
event_notifier_test_and_clear(n);
@@ -683,7 +687,8 @@ out_error:
static bool nvme_poll_cb(void *opaque)
{
EventNotifier *e = opaque;
- BDRVNVMeState *s = container_of(e, BDRVNVMeState, irq_notifier);
+ BDRVNVMeState *s = container_of(e, BDRVNVMeState,
+ irq_notifier[INDEX_ADMIN]);
trace_nvme_poll_cb(s);
return nvme_poll_queues(s);
@@ -705,7 +710,7 @@ static int nvme_init(BlockDriverState *bs, const char *device, int namespace,
s->device = g_strdup(device);
s->nsid = namespace;
s->aio_context = bdrv_get_aio_context(bs);
- ret = event_notifier_init(&s->irq_notifier, 0);
+ ret = event_notifier_init(&s->irq_notifier[INDEX_ADMIN], 0);
if (ret) {
error_setg(errp, "Failed to init event notifier");
return ret;
@@ -784,12 +789,13 @@ static int nvme_init(BlockDriverState *bs, const char *device, int namespace,
}
}
- ret = qemu_vfio_pci_init_irq(s->vfio, &s->irq_notifier,
+ ret = qemu_vfio_pci_init_irq(s->vfio, s->irq_notifier,
VFIO_PCI_MSIX_IRQ_INDEX, errp);
if (ret) {
goto out;
}
- aio_set_event_notifier(bdrv_get_aio_context(bs), &s->irq_notifier,
+ aio_set_event_notifier(bdrv_get_aio_context(bs),
+ &s->irq_notifier[INDEX_ADMIN],
false, nvme_handle_event, nvme_poll_cb);
nvme_identify(bs, namespace, &local_err);
@@ -872,9 +878,10 @@ static void nvme_close(BlockDriverState *bs)
nvme_free_queue_pair(s->queues[i]);
}
g_free(s->queues);
- aio_set_event_notifier(bdrv_get_aio_context(bs), &s->irq_notifier,
+ aio_set_event_notifier(bdrv_get_aio_context(bs),
+ &s->irq_notifier[INDEX_ADMIN],
false, NULL, NULL);
- event_notifier_cleanup(&s->irq_notifier);
+ event_notifier_cleanup(&s->irq_notifier[INDEX_ADMIN]);
qemu_vfio_pci_unmap_bar(s->vfio, 0, (void *)s->regs, 0, NVME_BAR_SIZE);
qemu_vfio_close(s->vfio);
@@ -1381,7 +1388,8 @@ static void nvme_detach_aio_context(BlockDriverState *bs)
q->completion_bh = NULL;
}
- aio_set_event_notifier(bdrv_get_aio_context(bs), &s->irq_notifier,
+ aio_set_event_notifier(bdrv_get_aio_context(bs),
+ &s->irq_notifier[INDEX_ADMIN],
false, NULL, NULL);
}
@@ -1391,7 +1399,7 @@ static void nvme_attach_aio_context(BlockDriverState *bs,
BDRVNVMeState *s = bs->opaque;
s->aio_context = new_context;
- aio_set_event_notifier(new_context, &s->irq_notifier,
+ aio_set_event_notifier(new_context, &s->irq_notifier[INDEX_ADMIN],
false, nvme_handle_event, nvme_poll_cb);
for (int i = 0; i < s->nr_queues; i++) {
--
2.26.2
On Tue, Aug 18, 2020 at 06:45:05PM +0200, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote: > In preparation of using multiple IRQ (thus multiple eventfds) > make BDRVNVMeState::irq_notifier an array (for now of a single > element, the admin queue notifier). > > Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com> > --- > block/nvme.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++++---------- > 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) This looks like an intermediate step before using multiple irqs. I think it makes the code confusing because on one hand INDEX_ADMIN gives the impression that INDEX_IO() should be used for io queues, while on the other hand only a single EventNotifier is allocated and we actually can't use INDEX_IO() yet. If this intermediate patch is really necessary, please don't use INDEX_ADMIN. Define a new constant instead: /* This driver shares a single MSIX IRQ for the admin and I/O queues */ #define MSIX_SHARED_IRQ_IDX 0 In the future the array index can be changed to INDEX_ADMIN and INDEX_IO(n) when there are multiple EventNotifiers. I think that would make the code clearer.
On 8/19/20 10:08 AM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote: > On Tue, Aug 18, 2020 at 06:45:05PM +0200, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote: >> In preparation of using multiple IRQ (thus multiple eventfds) >> make BDRVNVMeState::irq_notifier an array (for now of a single >> element, the admin queue notifier). >> >> Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com> >> --- >> block/nvme.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++++---------- >> 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) > > This looks like an intermediate step before using multiple irqs. I think > it makes the code confusing because on one hand INDEX_ADMIN gives the > impression that INDEX_IO() should be used for io queues, while on the > other hand only a single EventNotifier is allocated and we actually > can't use INDEX_IO() yet. > > If this intermediate patch is really necessary, please don't use > INDEX_ADMIN. Define a new constant instead: > > /* This driver shares a single MSIX IRQ for the admin and I/O queues */ > #define MSIX_SHARED_IRQ_IDX 0 > > In the future the array index can be changed to INDEX_ADMIN and > INDEX_IO(n) when there are multiple EventNotifiers. > > I think that would make the code clearer. Very good idea, thanks!
© 2016 - 2026 Red Hat, Inc.