If no boot device has been specified (via "bootindex=..."), the s390-ccw
bios scans through all devices to find a bootable device. But so far, it
stops at the very first block device (including virtio-scsi controllers
without attached devices) that it finds, no matter whether it is bootable
or not. That leads to some weird situatation where it is e.g. possible
to boot via:
qemu-system-s390x -hda /path/to/disk.qcow2
but not if there is e.g. a virtio-scsi controller specified before:
qemu-system-s390x -device virtio-scsi -hda /path/to/disk.qcow2
While using "bootindex=..." is clearly the preferred way of booting
on s390x, we still can make the life for the users at least a little
bit easier if we look at all available devices to find a bootable one.
Buglink: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1846975
Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
---
pc-bios/s390-ccw/main.c | 46 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
1 file changed, 31 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
diff --git a/pc-bios/s390-ccw/main.c b/pc-bios/s390-ccw/main.c
index 3cd01cd80f..0af872f9e3 100644
--- a/pc-bios/s390-ccw/main.c
+++ b/pc-bios/s390-ccw/main.c
@@ -182,20 +182,8 @@ static void boot_setup(void)
static void find_boot_device(void)
{
VDev *vdev = virtio_get_device();
- int ssid;
bool found;
- if (!have_iplb) {
- for (ssid = 0; ssid < 0x3; ssid++) {
- blk_schid.ssid = ssid;
- found = find_subch(-1);
- if (found) {
- return;
- }
- }
- panic("Could not find a suitable boot device (none specified)\n");
- }
-
switch (iplb.pbt) {
case S390_IPL_TYPE_CCW:
debug_print_int("device no. ", iplb.ccw.devno);
@@ -260,14 +248,42 @@ static void ipl_boot_device(void)
}
}
+/*
+ * No boot device has been specified, so we have to scan through the
+ * channels to find one.
+ */
+static void probe_boot_device(void)
+{
+ int ssid, sch_no, ret;
+
+ for (ssid = 0; ssid < 0x3; ssid++) {
+ blk_schid.ssid = ssid;
+ for (sch_no = 0; sch_no < 0x10000; sch_no++) {
+ ret = check_sch_no(-1, sch_no);
+ if (ret < 0) {
+ break;
+ }
+ if (ret == true) {
+ ipl_boot_device(); /* Only returns if unsuccessful */
+ }
+ }
+ }
+
+ sclp_print("Could not find a suitable boot device (none specified)\n");
+}
+
int main(void)
{
sclp_setup();
css_setup();
boot_setup();
- find_boot_device();
- enable_subchannel(blk_schid);
- ipl_boot_device();
+ if (have_iplb) {
+ find_boot_device();
+ enable_subchannel(blk_schid);
+ ipl_boot_device();
+ } else {
+ probe_boot_device();
+ }
panic("Failed to load OS from hard disk\n");
return 0; /* make compiler happy */
--
2.18.1
On Tue, 28 Jul 2020 20:37:33 +0200
Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com> wrote:
> If no boot device has been specified (via "bootindex=..."), the
> s390-ccw bios scans through all devices to find a bootable device.
maybe a better title for the patch is "scan through all devices if no
boot device specified" then, since it seems we will scan all
devices, not just "boot" devices?
> But so far, it stops at the very first block device (including
> virtio-scsi controllers without attached devices) that it finds, no
> matter whether it is bootable or not. That leads to some weird
> situatation where it is e.g. possible to boot via:
>
> qemu-system-s390x -hda /path/to/disk.qcow2
>
> but not if there is e.g. a virtio-scsi controller specified before:
>
> qemu-system-s390x -device virtio-scsi -hda /path/to/disk.qcow2
>
> While using "bootindex=..." is clearly the preferred way of booting
> on s390x, we still can make the life for the users at least a little
> bit easier if we look at all available devices to find a bootable one.
>
> Buglink: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1846975
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
> ---
> pc-bios/s390-ccw/main.c | 46
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------- 1 file changed, 31
> insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/pc-bios/s390-ccw/main.c b/pc-bios/s390-ccw/main.c
> index 3cd01cd80f..0af872f9e3 100644
> --- a/pc-bios/s390-ccw/main.c
> +++ b/pc-bios/s390-ccw/main.c
> @@ -182,20 +182,8 @@ static void boot_setup(void)
> static void find_boot_device(void)
> {
> VDev *vdev = virtio_get_device();
> - int ssid;
> bool found;
>
> - if (!have_iplb) {
> - for (ssid = 0; ssid < 0x3; ssid++) {
> - blk_schid.ssid = ssid;
> - found = find_subch(-1);
> - if (found) {
> - return;
> - }
> - }
> - panic("Could not find a suitable boot device (none
> specified)\n");
> - }
> -
> switch (iplb.pbt) {
> case S390_IPL_TYPE_CCW:
> debug_print_int("device no. ", iplb.ccw.devno);
> @@ -260,14 +248,42 @@ static void ipl_boot_device(void)
> }
> }
>
> +/*
> + * No boot device has been specified, so we have to scan through the
> + * channels to find one.
> + */
> +static void probe_boot_device(void)
> +{
> + int ssid, sch_no, ret;
> +
> + for (ssid = 0; ssid < 0x3; ssid++) {
> + blk_schid.ssid = ssid;
> + for (sch_no = 0; sch_no < 0x10000; sch_no++) {
> + ret = check_sch_no(-1, sch_no);
> + if (ret < 0) {
> + break;
> + }
> + if (ret == true) {
> + ipl_boot_device(); /* Only returns if
> unsuccessful */
> + }
> + }
> + }
> +
> + sclp_print("Could not find a suitable boot device (none
> specified)\n"); +}
> +
> int main(void)
> {
> sclp_setup();
> css_setup();
> boot_setup();
> - find_boot_device();
> - enable_subchannel(blk_schid);
> - ipl_boot_device();
> + if (have_iplb) {
> + find_boot_device();
> + enable_subchannel(blk_schid);
> + ipl_boot_device();
> + } else {
> + probe_boot_device();
> + }
>
> panic("Failed to load OS from hard disk\n");
> return 0; /* make compiler happy */
On Tue, 28 Jul 2020 20:37:33 +0200
Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com> wrote:
> If no boot device has been specified (via "bootindex=..."), the s390-ccw
> bios scans through all devices to find a bootable device. But so far, it
> stops at the very first block device (including virtio-scsi controllers
> without attached devices) that it finds, no matter whether it is bootable
> or not. That leads to some weird situatation where it is e.g. possible
> to boot via:
>
> qemu-system-s390x -hda /path/to/disk.qcow2
>
> but not if there is e.g. a virtio-scsi controller specified before:
>
> qemu-system-s390x -device virtio-scsi -hda /path/to/disk.qcow2
>
> While using "bootindex=..." is clearly the preferred way of booting
> on s390x, we still can make the life for the users at least a little
> bit easier if we look at all available devices to find a bootable one.
>
> Buglink: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1846975
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
> ---
> pc-bios/s390-ccw/main.c | 46 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
> 1 file changed, 31 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
(...)
> int main(void)
> {
> sclp_setup();
> css_setup();
> boot_setup();
> - find_boot_device();
> - enable_subchannel(blk_schid);
> - ipl_boot_device();
> + if (have_iplb) {
> + find_boot_device();
> + enable_subchannel(blk_schid);
> + ipl_boot_device();
> + } else {
> + probe_boot_device();
> + }
The one thing that's a bit surprising with the code is that
enable_subchannel() sticking out now. The code looking for a boot
device does that for all subchannels it looks at... but I think
find_boot_device() did that for specified devices already as well, so
it seems redundant?
Anyway, that's something that can be looked at later.
>
> panic("Failed to load OS from hard disk\n");
> return 0; /* make compiler happy */
Reviewed-by: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
On 05/08/2020 11.36, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> On Tue, 28 Jul 2020 20:37:33 +0200
> Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com> wrote:
>
>> If no boot device has been specified (via "bootindex=..."), the s390-ccw
>> bios scans through all devices to find a bootable device. But so far, it
>> stops at the very first block device (including virtio-scsi controllers
>> without attached devices) that it finds, no matter whether it is bootable
>> or not. That leads to some weird situatation where it is e.g. possible
>> to boot via:
>>
>> qemu-system-s390x -hda /path/to/disk.qcow2
>>
>> but not if there is e.g. a virtio-scsi controller specified before:
>>
>> qemu-system-s390x -device virtio-scsi -hda /path/to/disk.qcow2
>>
>> While using "bootindex=..." is clearly the preferred way of booting
>> on s390x, we still can make the life for the users at least a little
>> bit easier if we look at all available devices to find a bootable one.
>>
>> Buglink: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1846975
>> Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
>> ---
>> pc-bios/s390-ccw/main.c | 46 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
>> 1 file changed, 31 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
>
> (...)
>
>> int main(void)
>> {
>> sclp_setup();
>> css_setup();
>> boot_setup();
>> - find_boot_device();
>> - enable_subchannel(blk_schid);
>> - ipl_boot_device();
>> + if (have_iplb) {
>> + find_boot_device();
>> + enable_subchannel(blk_schid);
>> + ipl_boot_device();
>> + } else {
>> + probe_boot_device();
>> + }
>
> The one thing that's a bit surprising with the code is that
> enable_subchannel() sticking out now. The code looking for a boot
> device does that for all subchannels it looks at... but I think
> find_boot_device() did that for specified devices already as well, so
> it seems redundant?
>
> Anyway, that's something that can be looked at later.
Yes, I noticed that, too ... but yes, one clean-up step at a time. I've
put it on my todo-list for later.
>>
>> panic("Failed to load OS from hard disk\n");
>> return 0; /* make compiler happy */
>
> Reviewed-by: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
Thanks!
Thomas
© 2016 - 2026 Red Hat, Inc.