hw/s390x/virtio-ccw-crypto.c | 3 --- hw/s390x/virtio-ccw-rng.c | 3 --- hw/virtio/virtio-crypto-pci.c | 2 -- hw/virtio/virtio-rng-pci.c | 3 --- 4 files changed, 11 deletions(-)
virtio_crypto_pci_realize() and copies the value of vcrypto->vdev's
property "cryptodev" to vcrypto's property:
object_property_set_link(OBJECT(vrng), "rng", OBJECT(vrng->vdev.conf.rng),
NULL);
Since it does so only after realize, this always fails, but the error
is ignored.
It's actually superfluous: vcrypto's property is an alias of
vcrypto->vdev's property, created by virtio_instance_init_common().
Drop the call.
Same for virtio_ccw_crypto_realize(), virtio_rng_pci_realize(),
virtio_ccw_rng_realize().
Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
---
hw/s390x/virtio-ccw-crypto.c | 3 ---
hw/s390x/virtio-ccw-rng.c | 3 ---
hw/virtio/virtio-crypto-pci.c | 2 --
hw/virtio/virtio-rng-pci.c | 3 ---
4 files changed, 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/hw/s390x/virtio-ccw-crypto.c b/hw/s390x/virtio-ccw-crypto.c
index 570c0333fc..358c74fb4b 100644
--- a/hw/s390x/virtio-ccw-crypto.c
+++ b/hw/s390x/virtio-ccw-crypto.c
@@ -23,9 +23,6 @@ static void virtio_ccw_crypto_realize(VirtioCcwDevice *ccw_dev, Error **errp)
if (!qdev_realize(vdev, BUS(&ccw_dev->bus), errp)) {
return;
}
-
- object_property_set_link(OBJECT(vdev), "cryptodev",
- OBJECT(dev->vdev.conf.cryptodev), NULL);
}
static void virtio_ccw_crypto_instance_init(Object *obj)
diff --git a/hw/s390x/virtio-ccw-rng.c b/hw/s390x/virtio-ccw-rng.c
index 4bb8c16d79..2e3a9da5e8 100644
--- a/hw/s390x/virtio-ccw-rng.c
+++ b/hw/s390x/virtio-ccw-rng.c
@@ -24,9 +24,6 @@ static void virtio_ccw_rng_realize(VirtioCcwDevice *ccw_dev, Error **errp)
if (!qdev_realize(vdev, BUS(&ccw_dev->bus), errp)) {
return;
}
-
- object_property_set_link(OBJECT(dev), "rng", OBJECT(dev->vdev.conf.rng),
- NULL);
}
static void virtio_ccw_rng_instance_init(Object *obj)
diff --git a/hw/virtio/virtio-crypto-pci.c b/hw/virtio/virtio-crypto-pci.c
index f1cc979d33..198f86e08c 100644
--- a/hw/virtio/virtio-crypto-pci.c
+++ b/hw/virtio/virtio-crypto-pci.c
@@ -57,8 +57,6 @@ static void virtio_crypto_pci_realize(VirtIOPCIProxy *vpci_dev, Error **errp)
if (!qdev_realize(vdev, BUS(&vpci_dev->bus), errp)) {
return;
}
- object_property_set_link(OBJECT(vcrypto), "cryptodev",
- OBJECT(vcrypto->vdev.conf.cryptodev), NULL);
}
static void virtio_crypto_pci_class_init(ObjectClass *klass, void *data)
diff --git a/hw/virtio/virtio-rng-pci.c b/hw/virtio/virtio-rng-pci.c
index 2f0b529b62..8afbb4c209 100644
--- a/hw/virtio/virtio-rng-pci.c
+++ b/hw/virtio/virtio-rng-pci.c
@@ -38,9 +38,6 @@ static void virtio_rng_pci_realize(VirtIOPCIProxy *vpci_dev, Error **errp)
if (!qdev_realize(vdev, BUS(&vpci_dev->bus), errp)) {
return;
}
-
- object_property_set_link(OBJECT(vrng), "rng", OBJECT(vrng->vdev.conf.rng),
- NULL);
}
static void virtio_rng_pci_class_init(ObjectClass *klass, void *data)
--
2.26.2
On 7/21/20 2:11 PM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
Is there a line missing here?
> virtio_crypto_pci_realize() and copies the value of vcrypto->vdev's
^^^
> property "cryptodev" to vcrypto's property:
>
> object_property_set_link(OBJECT(vrng), "rng", OBJECT(vrng->vdev.conf.rng),
> NULL);
>
> Since it does so only after realize, this always fails, but the error
> is ignored.
>
> It's actually superfluous: vcrypto's property is an alias of
> vcrypto->vdev's property, created by virtio_instance_init_common().
>
> Drop the call.
>
> Same for virtio_ccw_crypto_realize(), virtio_rng_pci_realize(),
> virtio_ccw_rng_realize().
>
> Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
> ---
> hw/s390x/virtio-ccw-crypto.c | 3 ---
> hw/s390x/virtio-ccw-rng.c | 3 ---
> hw/virtio/virtio-crypto-pci.c | 2 --
> hw/virtio/virtio-rng-pci.c | 3 ---
> 4 files changed, 11 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/hw/s390x/virtio-ccw-crypto.c b/hw/s390x/virtio-ccw-crypto.c
> index 570c0333fc..358c74fb4b 100644
> --- a/hw/s390x/virtio-ccw-crypto.c
> +++ b/hw/s390x/virtio-ccw-crypto.c
> @@ -23,9 +23,6 @@ static void virtio_ccw_crypto_realize(VirtioCcwDevice *ccw_dev, Error **errp)
> if (!qdev_realize(vdev, BUS(&ccw_dev->bus), errp)) {
> return;
> }
> -
> - object_property_set_link(OBJECT(vdev), "cryptodev",
> - OBJECT(dev->vdev.conf.cryptodev), NULL);
> }
>
> static void virtio_ccw_crypto_instance_init(Object *obj)
> diff --git a/hw/s390x/virtio-ccw-rng.c b/hw/s390x/virtio-ccw-rng.c
> index 4bb8c16d79..2e3a9da5e8 100644
> --- a/hw/s390x/virtio-ccw-rng.c
> +++ b/hw/s390x/virtio-ccw-rng.c
> @@ -24,9 +24,6 @@ static void virtio_ccw_rng_realize(VirtioCcwDevice *ccw_dev, Error **errp)
> if (!qdev_realize(vdev, BUS(&ccw_dev->bus), errp)) {
> return;
> }
> -
> - object_property_set_link(OBJECT(dev), "rng", OBJECT(dev->vdev.conf.rng),
> - NULL);
> }
>
> static void virtio_ccw_rng_instance_init(Object *obj)
> diff --git a/hw/virtio/virtio-crypto-pci.c b/hw/virtio/virtio-crypto-pci.c
> index f1cc979d33..198f86e08c 100644
> --- a/hw/virtio/virtio-crypto-pci.c
> +++ b/hw/virtio/virtio-crypto-pci.c
> @@ -57,8 +57,6 @@ static void virtio_crypto_pci_realize(VirtIOPCIProxy *vpci_dev, Error **errp)
> if (!qdev_realize(vdev, BUS(&vpci_dev->bus), errp)) {
> return;
> }
> - object_property_set_link(OBJECT(vcrypto), "cryptodev",
> - OBJECT(vcrypto->vdev.conf.cryptodev), NULL);
> }
>
> static void virtio_crypto_pci_class_init(ObjectClass *klass, void *data)
> diff --git a/hw/virtio/virtio-rng-pci.c b/hw/virtio/virtio-rng-pci.c
> index 2f0b529b62..8afbb4c209 100644
> --- a/hw/virtio/virtio-rng-pci.c
> +++ b/hw/virtio/virtio-rng-pci.c
> @@ -38,9 +38,6 @@ static void virtio_rng_pci_realize(VirtIOPCIProxy *vpci_dev, Error **errp)
> if (!qdev_realize(vdev, BUS(&vpci_dev->bus), errp)) {
> return;
> }
> -
> - object_property_set_link(OBJECT(vrng), "rng", OBJECT(vrng->vdev.conf.rng),
> - NULL);
> }
>
> static void virtio_rng_pci_class_init(ObjectClass *klass, void *data)
>
Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com> writes: > On 7/21/20 2:11 PM, Markus Armbruster wrote: > > Is there a line missing here? > >> virtio_crypto_pci_realize() and copies the value of vcrypto->vdev's > > ^^^ > Scratch "and". I started describing two of the four cases together, then changed my mind and described just one, keeping other three under "Same for" below. I accidentally left the "and" behind. >> property "cryptodev" to vcrypto's property: >> >> object_property_set_link(OBJECT(vrng), "rng", OBJECT(vrng->vdev.conf.rng), >> NULL); >> >> Since it does so only after realize, this always fails, but the error >> is ignored. >> >> It's actually superfluous: vcrypto's property is an alias of >> vcrypto->vdev's property, created by virtio_instance_init_common(). >> >> Drop the call. >> >> Same for virtio_ccw_crypto_realize(), virtio_rng_pci_realize(), >> virtio_ccw_rng_realize(). >> >> Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
On Tue, 21 Jul 2020 14:11:53 +0200 Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> wrote: > virtio_crypto_pci_realize() and copies the value of vcrypto->vdev's > property "cryptodev" to vcrypto's property: > > object_property_set_link(OBJECT(vrng), "rng", OBJECT(vrng->vdev.conf.rng), > NULL); > > Since it does so only after realize, this always fails, but the error > is ignored. > > It's actually superfluous: vcrypto's property is an alias of > vcrypto->vdev's property, created by virtio_instance_init_common(). > > Drop the call. > > Same for virtio_ccw_crypto_realize(), virtio_rng_pci_realize(), > virtio_ccw_rng_realize(). > > Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> > --- > hw/s390x/virtio-ccw-crypto.c | 3 --- > hw/s390x/virtio-ccw-rng.c | 3 --- > hw/virtio/virtio-crypto-pci.c | 2 -- > hw/virtio/virtio-rng-pci.c | 3 --- > 4 files changed, 11 deletions(-) Reviewed-by: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
© 2016 - 2025 Red Hat, Inc.