Spec said: The driver uses this to selectively prevent the device from
executing requests from this virtqueue. 1 - enabled; 0 - disabled.
Though write 0 to queue_enable is forbidden by the spec, we should not
assume that the value is 1.
Fix this by ignore the write value other than 1.
Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
---
Changes from V1:
- fix typo
- warn wrong value through virtio_error
---
hw/virtio/virtio-pci.c | 12 ++++++++----
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/hw/virtio/virtio-pci.c b/hw/virtio/virtio-pci.c
index d028c17c24..7bc8c1c056 100644
--- a/hw/virtio/virtio-pci.c
+++ b/hw/virtio/virtio-pci.c
@@ -1273,16 +1273,20 @@ static void virtio_pci_common_write(void *opaque, hwaddr addr,
virtio_queue_set_vector(vdev, vdev->queue_sel, val);
break;
case VIRTIO_PCI_COMMON_Q_ENABLE:
- virtio_queue_set_num(vdev, vdev->queue_sel,
- proxy->vqs[vdev->queue_sel].num);
- virtio_queue_set_rings(vdev, vdev->queue_sel,
+ if (val == 1) {
+ virtio_queue_set_num(vdev, vdev->queue_sel,
+ proxy->vqs[vdev->queue_sel].num);
+ virtio_queue_set_rings(vdev, vdev->queue_sel,
((uint64_t)proxy->vqs[vdev->queue_sel].desc[1]) << 32 |
proxy->vqs[vdev->queue_sel].desc[0],
((uint64_t)proxy->vqs[vdev->queue_sel].avail[1]) << 32 |
proxy->vqs[vdev->queue_sel].avail[0],
((uint64_t)proxy->vqs[vdev->queue_sel].used[1]) << 32 |
proxy->vqs[vdev->queue_sel].used[0]);
- proxy->vqs[vdev->queue_sel].enabled = 1;
+ proxy->vqs[vdev->queue_sel].enabled = 1;
+ } else {
+ virtio_error(vdev, "wrong value for queue_enable %"PRIx64, val);
+ }
break;
case VIRTIO_PCI_COMMON_Q_DESCLO:
proxy->vqs[vdev->queue_sel].desc[0] = val;
--
2.20.1
On Wed, Jun 10, 2020 at 01:43:51PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: > Spec said: The driver uses this to selectively prevent the device from > executing requests from this virtqueue. 1 - enabled; 0 - disabled. > > Though write 0 to queue_enable is forbidden by the spec, we should not > assume that the value is 1. > > Fix this by ignore the write value other than 1. > > Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com> > --- > Changes from V1: > - fix typo > - warn wrong value through virtio_error > --- > hw/virtio/virtio-pci.c | 12 ++++++++---- > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/hw/virtio/virtio-pci.c b/hw/virtio/virtio-pci.c > index d028c17c24..7bc8c1c056 100644 > --- a/hw/virtio/virtio-pci.c > +++ b/hw/virtio/virtio-pci.c > @@ -1273,16 +1273,20 @@ static void virtio_pci_common_write(void *opaque, hwaddr addr, > virtio_queue_set_vector(vdev, vdev->queue_sel, val); > break; > case VIRTIO_PCI_COMMON_Q_ENABLE: > - virtio_queue_set_num(vdev, vdev->queue_sel, > - proxy->vqs[vdev->queue_sel].num); > - virtio_queue_set_rings(vdev, vdev->queue_sel, > + if (val == 1) { Does it have to be 1 or can it be any value other than 0? Thanks, Stefano > + virtio_queue_set_num(vdev, vdev->queue_sel, > + proxy->vqs[vdev->queue_sel].num); > + virtio_queue_set_rings(vdev, vdev->queue_sel, > ((uint64_t)proxy->vqs[vdev->queue_sel].desc[1]) << 32 | > proxy->vqs[vdev->queue_sel].desc[0], > ((uint64_t)proxy->vqs[vdev->queue_sel].avail[1]) << 32 | > proxy->vqs[vdev->queue_sel].avail[0], > ((uint64_t)proxy->vqs[vdev->queue_sel].used[1]) << 32 | > proxy->vqs[vdev->queue_sel].used[0]); > - proxy->vqs[vdev->queue_sel].enabled = 1; > + proxy->vqs[vdev->queue_sel].enabled = 1; > + } else { > + virtio_error(vdev, "wrong value for queue_enable %"PRIx64, val); > + } > break; > case VIRTIO_PCI_COMMON_Q_DESCLO: > proxy->vqs[vdev->queue_sel].desc[0] = val; > -- > 2.20.1 > >
On Wed, Jun 10, 2020 at 10:57:26AM +0200, Stefano Garzarella wrote: > On Wed, Jun 10, 2020 at 01:43:51PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: > > Spec said: The driver uses this to selectively prevent the device from > > executing requests from this virtqueue. 1 - enabled; 0 - disabled. > > > > Though write 0 to queue_enable is forbidden by the spec, we should not > > assume that the value is 1. > > > > Fix this by ignore the write value other than 1. > > > > Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com> > > --- > > Changes from V1: > > - fix typo > > - warn wrong value through virtio_error > > --- > > hw/virtio/virtio-pci.c | 12 ++++++++---- > > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/hw/virtio/virtio-pci.c b/hw/virtio/virtio-pci.c > > index d028c17c24..7bc8c1c056 100644 > > --- a/hw/virtio/virtio-pci.c > > +++ b/hw/virtio/virtio-pci.c > > @@ -1273,16 +1273,20 @@ static void virtio_pci_common_write(void *opaque, hwaddr addr, > > virtio_queue_set_vector(vdev, vdev->queue_sel, val); > > break; > > case VIRTIO_PCI_COMMON_Q_ENABLE: > > - virtio_queue_set_num(vdev, vdev->queue_sel, > > - proxy->vqs[vdev->queue_sel].num); > > - virtio_queue_set_rings(vdev, vdev->queue_sel, > > + if (val == 1) { > > Does it have to be 1 or can it be any value other than 0? > > Thanks, > Stefano spec says 1 > > + virtio_queue_set_num(vdev, vdev->queue_sel, > > + proxy->vqs[vdev->queue_sel].num); > > + virtio_queue_set_rings(vdev, vdev->queue_sel, > > ((uint64_t)proxy->vqs[vdev->queue_sel].desc[1]) << 32 | > > proxy->vqs[vdev->queue_sel].desc[0], > > ((uint64_t)proxy->vqs[vdev->queue_sel].avail[1]) << 32 | > > proxy->vqs[vdev->queue_sel].avail[0], > > ((uint64_t)proxy->vqs[vdev->queue_sel].used[1]) << 32 | > > proxy->vqs[vdev->queue_sel].used[0]); > > - proxy->vqs[vdev->queue_sel].enabled = 1; > > + proxy->vqs[vdev->queue_sel].enabled = 1; > > + } else { > > + virtio_error(vdev, "wrong value for queue_enable %"PRIx64, val); > > + } > > break; > > case VIRTIO_PCI_COMMON_Q_DESCLO: > > proxy->vqs[vdev->queue_sel].desc[0] = val; > > -- > > 2.20.1 > > > >
On Wed, Jun 10, 2020 at 05:42:54AM -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Wed, Jun 10, 2020 at 10:57:26AM +0200, Stefano Garzarella wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 10, 2020 at 01:43:51PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: > > > Spec said: The driver uses this to selectively prevent the device from > > > executing requests from this virtqueue. 1 - enabled; 0 - disabled. > > > > > > Though write 0 to queue_enable is forbidden by the spec, we should not > > > assume that the value is 1. > > > > > > Fix this by ignore the write value other than 1. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com> > > > --- > > > Changes from V1: > > > - fix typo > > > - warn wrong value through virtio_error > > > --- > > > hw/virtio/virtio-pci.c | 12 ++++++++---- > > > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > > > > > diff --git a/hw/virtio/virtio-pci.c b/hw/virtio/virtio-pci.c > > > index d028c17c24..7bc8c1c056 100644 > > > --- a/hw/virtio/virtio-pci.c > > > +++ b/hw/virtio/virtio-pci.c > > > @@ -1273,16 +1273,20 @@ static void virtio_pci_common_write(void *opaque, hwaddr addr, > > > virtio_queue_set_vector(vdev, vdev->queue_sel, val); > > > break; > > > case VIRTIO_PCI_COMMON_Q_ENABLE: > > > - virtio_queue_set_num(vdev, vdev->queue_sel, > > > - proxy->vqs[vdev->queue_sel].num); > > > - virtio_queue_set_rings(vdev, vdev->queue_sel, > > > + if (val == 1) { > > > > Does it have to be 1 or can it be any value other than 0? > > > > Thanks, > > Stefano > > spec says 1 I was confused by "The driver MUST NOT write a 0 to queue_enable.", interpreting it as "can write anything other than 0". But as Jason also wrote in the commit message, the driver should write 1 to enable, so Reviewed-by: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@redhat.com> Thanks, Stefano
On 2020/6/10 下午5:52, Stefano Garzarella wrote: > On Wed, Jun 10, 2020 at 05:42:54AM -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: >> On Wed, Jun 10, 2020 at 10:57:26AM +0200, Stefano Garzarella wrote: >>> On Wed, Jun 10, 2020 at 01:43:51PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: >>>> Spec said: The driver uses this to selectively prevent the device from >>>> executing requests from this virtqueue. 1 - enabled; 0 - disabled. >>>> >>>> Though write 0 to queue_enable is forbidden by the spec, we should not >>>> assume that the value is 1. >>>> >>>> Fix this by ignore the write value other than 1. >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com> >>>> --- >>>> Changes from V1: >>>> - fix typo >>>> - warn wrong value through virtio_error >>>> --- >>>> hw/virtio/virtio-pci.c | 12 ++++++++---- >>>> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) >>>> >>>> diff --git a/hw/virtio/virtio-pci.c b/hw/virtio/virtio-pci.c >>>> index d028c17c24..7bc8c1c056 100644 >>>> --- a/hw/virtio/virtio-pci.c >>>> +++ b/hw/virtio/virtio-pci.c >>>> @@ -1273,16 +1273,20 @@ static void virtio_pci_common_write(void *opaque, hwaddr addr, >>>> virtio_queue_set_vector(vdev, vdev->queue_sel, val); >>>> break; >>>> case VIRTIO_PCI_COMMON_Q_ENABLE: >>>> - virtio_queue_set_num(vdev, vdev->queue_sel, >>>> - proxy->vqs[vdev->queue_sel].num); >>>> - virtio_queue_set_rings(vdev, vdev->queue_sel, >>>> + if (val == 1) { >>> Does it have to be 1 or can it be any value other than 0? >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Stefano >> spec says 1 > I was confused by "The driver MUST NOT write a 0 to queue_enable.", > interpreting it as "can write anything other than 0". Yes, the spec is unclear about what happens if we write a value other than 0 or 1. Maybe we should clarify that only 1 is allowed. Or writing value other than 1 may cause unexpected result. > > But as Jason also wrote in the commit message, the driver should write > 1 to enable, so > > Reviewed-by: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@redhat.com> Thanks > > Thanks, > Stefano >
On Wed, Jun 10, 2020 at 01:43:51PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: > Spec said: The driver uses this to selectively prevent the device from > executing requests from this virtqueue. 1 - enabled; 0 - disabled. > > Though write 0 to queue_enable is forbidden by the spec, we should not > assume that the value is 1. > > Fix this by ignore the write value other than 1. > > Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com> > --- > Changes from V1: > - fix typo > - warn wrong value through virtio_error > --- > hw/virtio/virtio-pci.c | 12 ++++++++---- > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) Reviewed-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
© 2016 - 2024 Red Hat, Inc.