Add function to cancel running async block-copy call. It will be used
in backup.
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
---
include/block/block-copy.h | 7 +++++++
block/block-copy.c | 22 +++++++++++++++++++---
2 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/block/block-copy.h b/include/block/block-copy.h
index d40e691123..370a194d3c 100644
--- a/include/block/block-copy.h
+++ b/include/block/block-copy.h
@@ -67,6 +67,13 @@ BlockCopyCallState *block_copy_async(BlockCopyState *s,
void block_copy_set_speed(BlockCopyState *s, BlockCopyCallState *call_state,
uint64_t speed);
+/*
+ * Cancel running block-copy call.
+ * Cancel leaves block-copy state valid: dirty bits are correct and you may use
+ * cancel + <run block_copy with same parameters> to emulate pause/resume.
+ */
+void block_copy_cancel(BlockCopyCallState *call_state);
+
BdrvDirtyBitmap *block_copy_dirty_bitmap(BlockCopyState *s);
void block_copy_set_skip_unallocated(BlockCopyState *s, bool skip);
diff --git a/block/block-copy.c b/block/block-copy.c
index 851d9c8aaf..b551feb6c2 100644
--- a/block/block-copy.c
+++ b/block/block-copy.c
@@ -44,6 +44,8 @@ typedef struct BlockCopyCallState {
bool failed;
bool finished;
QemuCoSleepState *sleep_state;
+ bool cancelled;
+ Coroutine *canceller;
/* OUT parameters */
bool error_is_read;
@@ -582,7 +584,7 @@ block_copy_dirty_clusters(BlockCopyCallState *call_state)
assert(QEMU_IS_ALIGNED(offset, s->cluster_size));
assert(QEMU_IS_ALIGNED(bytes, s->cluster_size));
- while (bytes && aio_task_pool_status(aio) == 0) {
+ while (bytes && aio_task_pool_status(aio) == 0 && !call_state->cancelled) {
BlockCopyTask *task;
int64_t status_bytes;
@@ -693,7 +695,7 @@ static int coroutine_fn block_copy_common(BlockCopyCallState *call_state)
do {
ret = block_copy_dirty_clusters(call_state);
- if (ret == 0) {
+ if (ret == 0 && !call_state->cancelled) {
ret = block_copy_wait_one(call_state->s, call_state->offset,
call_state->bytes);
}
@@ -707,13 +709,18 @@ static int coroutine_fn block_copy_common(BlockCopyCallState *call_state)
* 2. We have waited for some intersecting block-copy request
* It may have failed and produced new dirty bits.
*/
- } while (ret > 0);
+ } while (ret > 0 && !call_state->cancelled);
if (call_state->cb) {
call_state->cb(ret, call_state->error_is_read,
call_state->s->progress_opaque);
}
+ if (call_state->canceller) {
+ aio_co_wake(call_state->canceller);
+ call_state->canceller = NULL;
+ }
+
call_state->finished = true;
return ret;
@@ -772,6 +779,15 @@ BlockCopyCallState *block_copy_async(BlockCopyState *s,
return call_state;
}
+
+void block_copy_cancel(BlockCopyCallState *call_state)
+{
+ call_state->cancelled = true;
+ call_state->canceller = qemu_coroutine_self();
+ block_copy_kick(call_state);
+ qemu_coroutine_yield();
+}
+
BdrvDirtyBitmap *block_copy_dirty_bitmap(BlockCopyState *s)
{
return s->copy_bitmap;
--
2.21.0
On 01.06.20 20:11, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
> Add function to cancel running async block-copy call. It will be used
> in backup.
>
> Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
> ---
> include/block/block-copy.h | 7 +++++++
> block/block-copy.c | 22 +++++++++++++++++++---
> 2 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/block/block-copy.h b/include/block/block-copy.h
> index d40e691123..370a194d3c 100644
> --- a/include/block/block-copy.h
> +++ b/include/block/block-copy.h
> @@ -67,6 +67,13 @@ BlockCopyCallState *block_copy_async(BlockCopyState *s,
> void block_copy_set_speed(BlockCopyState *s, BlockCopyCallState *call_state,
> uint64_t speed);
>
> +/*
> + * Cancel running block-copy call.
> + * Cancel leaves block-copy state valid: dirty bits are correct and you may use
> + * cancel + <run block_copy with same parameters> to emulate pause/resume.
> + */
> +void block_copy_cancel(BlockCopyCallState *call_state);
> +
> BdrvDirtyBitmap *block_copy_dirty_bitmap(BlockCopyState *s);
> void block_copy_set_skip_unallocated(BlockCopyState *s, bool skip);
>
> diff --git a/block/block-copy.c b/block/block-copy.c
> index 851d9c8aaf..b551feb6c2 100644
> --- a/block/block-copy.c
> +++ b/block/block-copy.c
> @@ -44,6 +44,8 @@ typedef struct BlockCopyCallState {
> bool failed;
> bool finished;
> QemuCoSleepState *sleep_state;
> + bool cancelled;
> + Coroutine *canceller;
>
> /* OUT parameters */
> bool error_is_read;
> @@ -582,7 +584,7 @@ block_copy_dirty_clusters(BlockCopyCallState *call_state)
> assert(QEMU_IS_ALIGNED(offset, s->cluster_size));
> assert(QEMU_IS_ALIGNED(bytes, s->cluster_size));
>
> - while (bytes && aio_task_pool_status(aio) == 0) {
> + while (bytes && aio_task_pool_status(aio) == 0 && !call_state->cancelled) {
> BlockCopyTask *task;
> int64_t status_bytes;
>
> @@ -693,7 +695,7 @@ static int coroutine_fn block_copy_common(BlockCopyCallState *call_state)
> do {
> ret = block_copy_dirty_clusters(call_state);
>
> - if (ret == 0) {
> + if (ret == 0 && !call_state->cancelled) {
> ret = block_copy_wait_one(call_state->s, call_state->offset,
> call_state->bytes);
> }
> @@ -707,13 +709,18 @@ static int coroutine_fn block_copy_common(BlockCopyCallState *call_state)
> * 2. We have waited for some intersecting block-copy request
> * It may have failed and produced new dirty bits.
> */
> - } while (ret > 0);
> + } while (ret > 0 && !call_state->cancelled);
Would it be cleaner if block_copy_dirty_cluster() just returned
-ECANCELED? Or would that pose a problem for its callers or the async
callback?
> if (call_state->cb) {
> call_state->cb(ret, call_state->error_is_read,
> call_state->s->progress_opaque);
> }
>
> + if (call_state->canceller) {
> + aio_co_wake(call_state->canceller);
> + call_state->canceller = NULL;
> + }
> +
> call_state->finished = true;
>
> return ret;
22.07.2020 14:28, Max Reitz wrote:
> On 01.06.20 20:11, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
>> Add function to cancel running async block-copy call. It will be used
>> in backup.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
>> ---
>> include/block/block-copy.h | 7 +++++++
>> block/block-copy.c | 22 +++++++++++++++++++---
>> 2 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/include/block/block-copy.h b/include/block/block-copy.h
>> index d40e691123..370a194d3c 100644
>> --- a/include/block/block-copy.h
>> +++ b/include/block/block-copy.h
>> @@ -67,6 +67,13 @@ BlockCopyCallState *block_copy_async(BlockCopyState *s,
>> void block_copy_set_speed(BlockCopyState *s, BlockCopyCallState *call_state,
>> uint64_t speed);
>>
>> +/*
>> + * Cancel running block-copy call.
>> + * Cancel leaves block-copy state valid: dirty bits are correct and you may use
>> + * cancel + <run block_copy with same parameters> to emulate pause/resume.
>> + */
>> +void block_copy_cancel(BlockCopyCallState *call_state);
>> +
>> BdrvDirtyBitmap *block_copy_dirty_bitmap(BlockCopyState *s);
>> void block_copy_set_skip_unallocated(BlockCopyState *s, bool skip);
>>
>> diff --git a/block/block-copy.c b/block/block-copy.c
>> index 851d9c8aaf..b551feb6c2 100644
>> --- a/block/block-copy.c
>> +++ b/block/block-copy.c
>> @@ -44,6 +44,8 @@ typedef struct BlockCopyCallState {
>> bool failed;
>> bool finished;
>> QemuCoSleepState *sleep_state;
>> + bool cancelled;
>> + Coroutine *canceller;
>>
>> /* OUT parameters */
>> bool error_is_read;
>> @@ -582,7 +584,7 @@ block_copy_dirty_clusters(BlockCopyCallState *call_state)
>> assert(QEMU_IS_ALIGNED(offset, s->cluster_size));
>> assert(QEMU_IS_ALIGNED(bytes, s->cluster_size));
>>
>> - while (bytes && aio_task_pool_status(aio) == 0) {
>> + while (bytes && aio_task_pool_status(aio) == 0 && !call_state->cancelled) {
>> BlockCopyTask *task;
>> int64_t status_bytes;
>>
>> @@ -693,7 +695,7 @@ static int coroutine_fn block_copy_common(BlockCopyCallState *call_state)
>> do {
>> ret = block_copy_dirty_clusters(call_state);
>>
>> - if (ret == 0) {
>> + if (ret == 0 && !call_state->cancelled) {
>> ret = block_copy_wait_one(call_state->s, call_state->offset,
>> call_state->bytes);
>> }
>> @@ -707,13 +709,18 @@ static int coroutine_fn block_copy_common(BlockCopyCallState *call_state)
>> * 2. We have waited for some intersecting block-copy request
>> * It may have failed and produced new dirty bits.
>> */
>> - } while (ret > 0);
>> + } while (ret > 0 && !call_state->cancelled);
>
> Would it be cleaner if block_copy_dirty_cluster() just returned
> -ECANCELED? Or would that pose a problem for its callers or the async
> callback?
>
I'd prefer not to merge io ret with block-copy logic: who knows what underlying operations may return.. Can't it be _another_ ECANCELED?
And it would be just a sugar for block_copy_dirty_clusters() call, I'll have to check ->cancelled after block_copy_wait_one() anyway.
Also, for the next version I try to make it more obvious that finished block-copy call is in one of thee states:
- success
- failed
- cancelled
Hmm. Also, cancelled should be OK for copy-on-write operations in filter, it just mean that we don't need to care anymore.
>> if (call_state->cb) {
>> call_state->cb(ret, call_state->error_is_read,
>> call_state->s->progress_opaque);
>> }
>>
>> + if (call_state->canceller) {
>> + aio_co_wake(call_state->canceller);
>> + call_state->canceller = NULL;
>> + }
>> +
>> call_state->finished = true;
>>
>> return ret;
>
--
Best regards,
Vladimir
22.10.2020 23:50, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
> 22.07.2020 14:28, Max Reitz wrote:
>> On 01.06.20 20:11, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
>>> Add function to cancel running async block-copy call. It will be used
>>> in backup.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
>>> ---
>>> include/block/block-copy.h | 7 +++++++
>>> block/block-copy.c | 22 +++++++++++++++++++---
>>> 2 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/include/block/block-copy.h b/include/block/block-copy.h
>>> index d40e691123..370a194d3c 100644
>>> --- a/include/block/block-copy.h
>>> +++ b/include/block/block-copy.h
>>> @@ -67,6 +67,13 @@ BlockCopyCallState *block_copy_async(BlockCopyState *s,
>>> void block_copy_set_speed(BlockCopyState *s, BlockCopyCallState *call_state,
>>> uint64_t speed);
>>> +/*
>>> + * Cancel running block-copy call.
>>> + * Cancel leaves block-copy state valid: dirty bits are correct and you may use
>>> + * cancel + <run block_copy with same parameters> to emulate pause/resume.
>>> + */
>>> +void block_copy_cancel(BlockCopyCallState *call_state);
>>> +
>>> BdrvDirtyBitmap *block_copy_dirty_bitmap(BlockCopyState *s);
>>> void block_copy_set_skip_unallocated(BlockCopyState *s, bool skip);
>>> diff --git a/block/block-copy.c b/block/block-copy.c
>>> index 851d9c8aaf..b551feb6c2 100644
>>> --- a/block/block-copy.c
>>> +++ b/block/block-copy.c
>>> @@ -44,6 +44,8 @@ typedef struct BlockCopyCallState {
>>> bool failed;
>>> bool finished;
>>> QemuCoSleepState *sleep_state;
>>> + bool cancelled;
>>> + Coroutine *canceller;
>>> /* OUT parameters */
>>> bool error_is_read;
>>> @@ -582,7 +584,7 @@ block_copy_dirty_clusters(BlockCopyCallState *call_state)
>>> assert(QEMU_IS_ALIGNED(offset, s->cluster_size));
>>> assert(QEMU_IS_ALIGNED(bytes, s->cluster_size));
>>> - while (bytes && aio_task_pool_status(aio) == 0) {
>>> + while (bytes && aio_task_pool_status(aio) == 0 && !call_state->cancelled) {
>>> BlockCopyTask *task;
>>> int64_t status_bytes;
>>> @@ -693,7 +695,7 @@ static int coroutine_fn block_copy_common(BlockCopyCallState *call_state)
>>> do {
>>> ret = block_copy_dirty_clusters(call_state);
>>> - if (ret == 0) {
>>> + if (ret == 0 && !call_state->cancelled) {
>>> ret = block_copy_wait_one(call_state->s, call_state->offset,
>>> call_state->bytes);
>>> }
>>> @@ -707,13 +709,18 @@ static int coroutine_fn block_copy_common(BlockCopyCallState *call_state)
>>> * 2. We have waited for some intersecting block-copy request
>>> * It may have failed and produced new dirty bits.
>>> */
>>> - } while (ret > 0);
>>> + } while (ret > 0 && !call_state->cancelled);
>>
>> Would it be cleaner if block_copy_dirty_cluster() just returned
>> -ECANCELED? Or would that pose a problem for its callers or the async
>> callback?
>>
>
> I'd prefer not to merge io ret with block-copy logic: who knows what underlying operations may return.. Can't it be _another_ ECANCELED?
> And it would be just a sugar for block_copy_dirty_clusters() call, I'll have to check ->cancelled after block_copy_wait_one() anyway.
> Also, for the next version I try to make it more obvious that finished block-copy call is in one of thee states:
> - success
> - failed
> - cancelled
>
> Hmm. Also, cancelled should be OK for copy-on-write operations in filter, it just mean that we don't need to care anymore.
This is unrelated: actually only async block-copy call may be cancelled.
>
>>> if (call_state->cb) {
>>> call_state->cb(ret, call_state->error_is_read,
>>> call_state->s->progress_opaque);
>>> }
>>> + if (call_state->canceller) {
>>> + aio_co_wake(call_state->canceller);
>>> + call_state->canceller = NULL;
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> call_state->finished = true;
>>> return ret;
>>
>
>
--
Best regards,
Vladimir
On 22.10.20 22:50, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
> 22.07.2020 14:28, Max Reitz wrote:
>> On 01.06.20 20:11, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
>>> Add function to cancel running async block-copy call. It will be used
>>> in backup.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
>>> ---
>>> include/block/block-copy.h | 7 +++++++
>>> block/block-copy.c | 22 +++++++++++++++++++---
>>> 2 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/include/block/block-copy.h b/include/block/block-copy.h
>>> index d40e691123..370a194d3c 100644
>>> --- a/include/block/block-copy.h
>>> +++ b/include/block/block-copy.h
>>> @@ -67,6 +67,13 @@ BlockCopyCallState
>>> *block_copy_async(BlockCopyState *s,
>>> void block_copy_set_speed(BlockCopyState *s, BlockCopyCallState
>>> *call_state,
>>> uint64_t speed);
>>> +/*
>>> + * Cancel running block-copy call.
>>> + * Cancel leaves block-copy state valid: dirty bits are correct and
>>> you may use
>>> + * cancel + <run block_copy with same parameters> to emulate
>>> pause/resume.
>>> + */
>>> +void block_copy_cancel(BlockCopyCallState *call_state);
>>> +
>>> BdrvDirtyBitmap *block_copy_dirty_bitmap(BlockCopyState *s);
>>> void block_copy_set_skip_unallocated(BlockCopyState *s, bool skip);
>>> diff --git a/block/block-copy.c b/block/block-copy.c
>>> index 851d9c8aaf..b551feb6c2 100644
>>> --- a/block/block-copy.c
>>> +++ b/block/block-copy.c
>>> @@ -44,6 +44,8 @@ typedef struct BlockCopyCallState {
>>> bool failed;
>>> bool finished;
>>> QemuCoSleepState *sleep_state;
>>> + bool cancelled;
>>> + Coroutine *canceller;
>>> /* OUT parameters */
>>> bool error_is_read;
>>> @@ -582,7 +584,7 @@ block_copy_dirty_clusters(BlockCopyCallState
>>> *call_state)
>>> assert(QEMU_IS_ALIGNED(offset, s->cluster_size));
>>> assert(QEMU_IS_ALIGNED(bytes, s->cluster_size));
>>> - while (bytes && aio_task_pool_status(aio) == 0) {
>>> + while (bytes && aio_task_pool_status(aio) == 0 &&
>>> !call_state->cancelled) {
>>> BlockCopyTask *task;
>>> int64_t status_bytes;
>>> @@ -693,7 +695,7 @@ static int coroutine_fn
>>> block_copy_common(BlockCopyCallState *call_state)
>>> do {
>>> ret = block_copy_dirty_clusters(call_state);
>>> - if (ret == 0) {
>>> + if (ret == 0 && !call_state->cancelled) {
>>> ret = block_copy_wait_one(call_state->s,
>>> call_state->offset,
>>> call_state->bytes);
>>> }
>>> @@ -707,13 +709,18 @@ static int coroutine_fn
>>> block_copy_common(BlockCopyCallState *call_state)
>>> * 2. We have waited for some intersecting block-copy request
>>> * It may have failed and produced new dirty bits.
>>> */
>>> - } while (ret > 0);
>>> + } while (ret > 0 && !call_state->cancelled);
>>
>> Would it be cleaner if block_copy_dirty_cluster() just returned
>> -ECANCELED? Or would that pose a problem for its callers or the async
>> callback?
>>
>
> I'd prefer not to merge io ret with block-copy logic: who knows what
> underlying operations may return.. Can't it be _another_ ECANCELED?
> And it would be just a sugar for block_copy_dirty_clusters() call, I'll
> have to check ->cancelled after block_copy_wait_one() anyway.
> Also, for the next version I try to make it more obvious that finished
> block-copy call is in one of thee states:
> - success
> - failed
> - cancelled
OK.
Max
© 2016 - 2026 Red Hat, Inc.