[PATCH v3] aspeed: Add support for the sonorapass-bmc board

Patrick Williams posted 1 patch 3 years, 12 months ago
Test docker-mingw@fedora passed
Test checkpatch passed
Test asan passed
Test docker-quick@centos7 passed
Test FreeBSD passed
Patches applied successfully (tree, apply log)
git fetch https://github.com/patchew-project/qemu tags/patchew/20200506183219.2166987-1-patrick@stwcx.xyz
hw/arm/aspeed.c | 77 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 77 insertions(+)
[PATCH v3] aspeed: Add support for the sonorapass-bmc board
Posted by Patrick Williams 3 years, 12 months ago
Sonora Pass is a 2 socket x86 motherboard designed by Facebook
and supported by OpenBMC.  Strapping configuration was obtained
from hardware and i2c configuration is based on dts found at:

https://github.com/facebook/openbmc-linux/blob/1633c87b8ba7c162095787c988979b748ba65dc8/arch/arm/boot/dts/aspeed-bmc-facebook-sonorapass.dts

Booted a test image of http://github.com/facebook/openbmc to login
prompt.

Signed-off-by: Patrick Williams <patrick@stwcx.xyz>
Reviewed-by: Amithash Prasad <amithash@fb.com>
Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
---
 hw/arm/aspeed.c | 77 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 77 insertions(+)

diff --git a/hw/arm/aspeed.c b/hw/arm/aspeed.c
index 6f4d7075c4..74c46681e8 100644
--- a/hw/arm/aspeed.c
+++ b/hw/arm/aspeed.c
@@ -74,6 +74,21 @@ struct AspeedBoardState {
         SCU_AST2500_HW_STRAP_ACPI_ENABLE |                              \
         SCU_HW_STRAP_SPI_MODE(SCU_HW_STRAP_SPI_MASTER))
 
+/* Sonorapass hardware value: 0xF100D216 */
+#define SONORAPASS_BMC_HW_STRAP1 (                                      \
+        SCU_AST2500_HW_STRAP_SPI_AUTOFETCH_ENABLE |                     \
+        SCU_AST2500_HW_STRAP_GPIO_STRAP_ENABLE |                        \
+        SCU_AST2500_HW_STRAP_UART_DEBUG |                               \
+        SCU_AST2500_HW_STRAP_RESERVED28 |                               \
+        SCU_AST2500_HW_STRAP_DDR4_ENABLE |                              \
+        SCU_HW_STRAP_VGA_CLASS_CODE |                                   \
+        SCU_HW_STRAP_LPC_RESET_PIN |                                    \
+        SCU_HW_STRAP_SPI_MODE(SCU_HW_STRAP_SPI_MASTER) |                \
+        SCU_AST2500_HW_STRAP_SET_AXI_AHB_RATIO(AXI_AHB_RATIO_2_1) |     \
+        SCU_HW_STRAP_VGA_BIOS_ROM |                                     \
+        SCU_HW_STRAP_VGA_SIZE_SET(VGA_16M_DRAM) |                       \
+        SCU_AST2500_HW_STRAP_RESERVED1)
+
 /* Swift hardware value: 0xF11AD206 */
 #define SWIFT_BMC_HW_STRAP1 (                                           \
         AST2500_HW_STRAP1_DEFAULTS |                                    \
@@ -434,6 +449,49 @@ static void swift_bmc_i2c_init(AspeedBoardState *bmc)
     i2c_create_slave(aspeed_i2c_get_bus(DEVICE(&soc->i2c), 12), "tmp105", 0x4a);
 }
 
+static void sonorapass_bmc_i2c_init(AspeedBoardState *bmc)
+{
+    AspeedSoCState *soc = &bmc->soc;
+
+    /* bus 2 : */
+    i2c_create_slave(aspeed_i2c_get_bus(DEVICE(&soc->i2c), 2), "tmp105", 0x48);
+    i2c_create_slave(aspeed_i2c_get_bus(DEVICE(&soc->i2c), 2), "tmp105", 0x49);
+    /* bus 2 : pca9546 @ 0x73 */
+
+    /* bus 3 : pca9548 @ 0x70 */
+
+    /* bus 4 : */
+    uint8_t *eeprom4_54 = g_malloc0(8 * 1024);
+    smbus_eeprom_init_one(aspeed_i2c_get_bus(DEVICE(&soc->i2c), 4), 0x54,
+                          eeprom4_54);
+    /* PCA9539 @ 0x76, but PCA9552 is compatible */
+    i2c_create_slave(aspeed_i2c_get_bus(DEVICE(&soc->i2c), 4), "pca9552", 0x76);
+    /* PCA9539 @ 0x77, but PCA9552 is compatible */
+    i2c_create_slave(aspeed_i2c_get_bus(DEVICE(&soc->i2c), 4), "pca9552", 0x77);
+
+    /* bus 6 : */
+    i2c_create_slave(aspeed_i2c_get_bus(DEVICE(&soc->i2c), 6), "tmp105", 0x48);
+    i2c_create_slave(aspeed_i2c_get_bus(DEVICE(&soc->i2c), 6), "tmp105", 0x49);
+    /* bus 6 : pca9546 @ 0x73 */
+
+    /* bus 8 : */
+    uint8_t *eeprom8_56 = g_malloc0(8 * 1024);
+    smbus_eeprom_init_one(aspeed_i2c_get_bus(DEVICE(&soc->i2c), 8), 0x56,
+                          eeprom8_56);
+    i2c_create_slave(aspeed_i2c_get_bus(DEVICE(&soc->i2c), 8), "pca9552", 0x60);
+    i2c_create_slave(aspeed_i2c_get_bus(DEVICE(&soc->i2c), 8), "pca9552", 0x61);
+    /* bus 8 : adc128d818 @ 0x1d */
+    /* bus 8 : adc128d818 @ 0x1f */
+
+    /* bus 13 : pca9548 @ 0x71
+     *      - channel 3:
+     *          - tmm421 @ 0x4c
+     *          - tmp421 @ 0x4e
+     *          - tmp421 @ 0x4f
+     */
+
+}
+
 static void witherspoon_bmc_i2c_init(AspeedBoardState *bmc)
 {
     AspeedSoCState *soc = &bmc->soc;
@@ -552,6 +610,21 @@ static void aspeed_machine_romulus_class_init(ObjectClass *oc, void *data)
     mc->default_ram_size       = 512 * MiB;
 };
 
+static void aspeed_machine_sonorapass_class_init(ObjectClass *oc, void *data)
+{
+    MachineClass *mc = MACHINE_CLASS(oc);
+    AspeedMachineClass *amc = ASPEED_MACHINE_CLASS(oc);
+
+    mc->desc       = "OCP SonoraPass BMC (ARM1176)";
+    amc->soc_name  = "ast2500-a1";
+    amc->hw_strap1 = SONORAPASS_BMC_HW_STRAP1;
+    amc->fmc_model = "mx66l1g45g";
+    amc->spi_model = "mx66l1g45g";
+    amc->num_cs    = 2;
+    amc->i2c_init  = sonorapass_bmc_i2c_init;
+    mc->default_ram_size       = 512 * MiB;
+};
+
 static void aspeed_machine_swift_class_init(ObjectClass *oc, void *data)
 {
     MachineClass *mc = MACHINE_CLASS(oc);
@@ -631,6 +704,10 @@ static const TypeInfo aspeed_machine_types[] = {
         .name          = MACHINE_TYPE_NAME("swift-bmc"),
         .parent        = TYPE_ASPEED_MACHINE,
         .class_init    = aspeed_machine_swift_class_init,
+    }, {
+        .name          = MACHINE_TYPE_NAME("sonorapass-bmc"),
+        .parent        = TYPE_ASPEED_MACHINE,
+        .class_init    = aspeed_machine_sonorapass_class_init,
     }, {
         .name          = MACHINE_TYPE_NAME("witherspoon-bmc"),
         .parent        = TYPE_ASPEED_MACHINE,
-- 
2.26.2


Re: [PATCH v3] aspeed: Add support for the sonorapass-bmc board
Posted by Peter Maydell 3 years, 11 months ago
On Wed, 6 May 2020 at 19:32, Patrick Williams <patrick@stwcx.xyz> wrote:
>
> Sonora Pass is a 2 socket x86 motherboard designed by Facebook
> and supported by OpenBMC.  Strapping configuration was obtained
> from hardware and i2c configuration is based on dts found at:
>
> https://github.com/facebook/openbmc-linux/blob/1633c87b8ba7c162095787c988979b748ba65dc8/arch/arm/boot/dts/aspeed-bmc-facebook-sonorapass.dts
>
> Booted a test image of http://github.com/facebook/openbmc to login
> prompt.
>
> Signed-off-by: Patrick Williams <patrick@stwcx.xyz>
> Reviewed-by: Amithash Prasad <amithash@fb.com>
> Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>



Applied to target-arm.next, thanks.

-- PMM

Re: [PATCH v3] aspeed: Add support for the sonorapass-bmc board
Posted by Peter Maydell 3 years, 11 months ago
On Wed, 6 May 2020 at 19:32, Patrick Williams <patrick@stwcx.xyz> wrote:
>
> Sonora Pass is a 2 socket x86 motherboard designed by Facebook
> and supported by OpenBMC.  Strapping configuration was obtained
> from hardware and i2c configuration is based on dts found at:
>
> https://github.com/facebook/openbmc-linux/blob/1633c87b8ba7c162095787c988979b748ba65dc8/arch/arm/boot/dts/aspeed-bmc-facebook-sonorapass.dts
>
> Booted a test image of http://github.com/facebook/openbmc to login
> prompt.
>
> Signed-off-by: Patrick Williams <patrick@stwcx.xyz>
> Reviewed-by: Amithash Prasad <amithash@fb.com>
> Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>

Looking up through the thread I can't find the email where
Amithash gave his reviewed-by tag -- did I miss it?

PS: for the future, v2/v3 etc patches should be sent as
fresh emails, not as followups/replies to the v1.

thanks
-- PMM

Re: [PATCH v3] aspeed: Add support for the sonorapass-bmc board
Posted by Patrick Williams 3 years, 11 months ago
On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 11:54:42AM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On Wed, 6 May 2020 at 19:32, Patrick Williams <patrick@stwcx.xyz> wrote:

> Looking up through the thread I can't find the email where
> Amithash gave his reviewed-by tag -- did I miss it?

I probably shouldn't have done this.  I asked Amithash off-list for his
approval to add his Reviewed-by.  I'll ask him to reply to this with
confirmation.

> PS: for the future, v2/v3 etc patches should be sent as
> fresh emails, not as followups/replies to the v1.

Thanks.  I missed this detail when I read [1] before but I see it now.
It seems like LKML tends to do the opposite?

1. https://wiki.qemu.org/Contribute/SubmitAPatch

-- 
Patrick Williams
Re: [PATCH v3] aspeed: Add support for the sonorapass-bmc board
Posted by Peter Maydell 3 years, 11 months ago
On Mon, 11 May 2020 at 14:13, Patrick Williams <patrick@stwcx.xyz> wrote:
>
> On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 11:54:42AM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote:
> > On Wed, 6 May 2020 at 19:32, Patrick Williams <patrick@stwcx.xyz> wrote:
>
> > Looking up through the thread I can't find the email where
> > Amithash gave his reviewed-by tag -- did I miss it?
>
> I probably shouldn't have done this.  I asked Amithash off-list for his
> approval to add his Reviewed-by.  I'll ask him to reply to this with
> confirmation.

Thanks; no big deal. I figured I'd check because the details
of how we handle reviewed-by tags are a bit non-obvious if you
haven't worked with projects like QEMU or the kernel that use
this email-based workflow before.

> > PS: for the future, v2/v3 etc patches should be sent as
> > fresh emails, not as followups/replies to the v1.
>
> Thanks.  I missed this detail when I read [1] before but I see it now.
> It seems like LKML tends to do the opposite?

I don't do kernel development but AIUI they have the same
general approach we do. Their process doc:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst#n771
says:
  "for a multi-patch series, it is generally
   best to avoid using In-Reply-To: to link to older versions of the
   series.  This way multiple versions of the patch don't become an
   unmanageable forest of references in email clients."

thanks
-- PMM