fuzz: Probably there is a better way to do this

[PATCH 0/3] fuzz: Probably there is a better way to do this

Markus Armbruster posted 3 patches 5 years, 6 months ago

Download series mbox

Test docker-mingw@fedora passed

Test docker-quick@centos7 passed

Test checkpatch passed

Test FreeBSD passed

Test asan passed

Patches applied successfully (tree, apply log)
git fetch https://github.com/patchew-project/qemu tags/patchew/20200424071142.3525-1-armbru@redhat.com

Maintainers: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>, Alexander Bulekov <alxndr@bu.edu>, Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>, Laurent Vivier <lvivier@redhat.com>, Bandan Das <bsd@redhat.com>, Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>

Makefile                          |  1 -
tests/qtest/libqos/qos_external.h | 10 +++--
tests/qtest/fuzz/qos_fuzz.c       | 34 ++++-----------
tests/qtest/libqos/qos_external.c | 72 +++++++++++--------------------
tests/qtest/qos-test.c            | 29 +++++++++----
5 files changed, 60 insertions(+), 86 deletions(-)

Expand all Fold all

[PATCH 0/3] fuzz: Probably there is a better way to do this

Posted by Markus Armbruster 5 years, 6 months ago

... the comment next to qos_set_machines_devices_available() wonders.
Yup, there is!

Markus Armbruster (3):
  Makefile: Drop unused, broken target recurse-fuzz
  fuzz: Simplify how we compute available machines and types
  libqos: Give get_machine_allocator() internal linkage

 Makefile                          |  1 -
 tests/qtest/libqos/qos_external.h | 10 +++--
 tests/qtest/fuzz/qos_fuzz.c       | 34 ++++-----------
 tests/qtest/libqos/qos_external.c | 72 +++++++++++--------------------
 tests/qtest/qos-test.c            | 29 +++++++++----
 5 files changed, 60 insertions(+), 86 deletions(-)

-- 
2.21.1

Re: [PATCH 0/3] fuzz: Probably there is a better way to do this

Posted by Markus Armbruster 5 years, 6 months ago

Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> writes:

> ... the comment next to qos_set_machines_devices_available() wonders.
> Yup, there is!

Queued.