From: "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com>
Commit 355477f8c73e9 skips rom reset when we're an incoming migration
so as not to overwrite shared ram in the ignore-shared migration
optimisation.
However, it's got an unexpected side effect that because it skips
freeing the ROM data, when rom_reset gets called later on, after
migration (e.g. during a reboot), the ROM does get reset to the original
file contents. Because of seabios/x86's weird reboot process
this confuses a reboot into hanging after a migration.
Fixes: 355477f8c73e9 ("migration: do not rom_reset() during incoming migration")
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1809380
Signed-off-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>
---
hw/core/loader.c | 25 ++++++++++++++++---------
1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/hw/core/loader.c b/hw/core/loader.c
index d1b78f60cd..eeef6da9a1 100644
--- a/hw/core/loader.c
+++ b/hw/core/loader.c
@@ -1119,19 +1119,26 @@ static void rom_reset(void *unused)
{
Rom *rom;
- /*
- * We don't need to fill in the RAM with ROM data because we'll fill
- * the data in during the next incoming migration in all cases. Note
- * that some of those RAMs can actually be modified by the guest on ARM
- * so this is probably the only right thing to do here.
- */
- if (runstate_check(RUN_STATE_INMIGRATE))
- return;
-
QTAILQ_FOREACH(rom, &roms, next) {
if (rom->fw_file) {
continue;
}
+ /*
+ * We don't need to fill in the RAM with ROM data because we'll fill
+ * the data in during the next incoming migration in all cases. Note
+ * that some of those RAMs can actually be modified by the guest.
+ */
+ if (runstate_check(RUN_STATE_INMIGRATE)) {
+ if (rom->data && rom->isrom) {
+ /*
+ * Free it so that a rom_reset after migration doesn't
+ * overwrite a potentially modified 'rom'.
+ */
+ rom_free_data(rom);
+ }
+ continue;
+ }
+
if (rom->data == NULL) {
continue;
}
--
2.24.1