We missed an instance of using FIELD_EX32 on a 64-bit ID
register, in isar_feature_aa64_pmu_8_4(). Fix it.

Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Message-id: 20200224172846.13053-2-peter.maydell@linaro.org
---
 target/arm/cpu.h | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/target/arm/cpu.h b/target/arm/cpu.h
index 05aa9711cd8..6013287f623 100644
--- a/target/arm/cpu.h
+++ b/target/arm/cpu.h
@@ -3770,8 +3770,8 @@ static inline bool isar_feature_aa64_pmu_8_1(const ARMISARegisters *id)
 
 static inline bool isar_feature_aa64_pmu_8_4(const ARMISARegisters *id)
 {
-    return FIELD_EX32(id->id_aa64dfr0, ID_AA64DFR0, PMUVER) >= 5 &&
-        FIELD_EX32(id->id_aa64dfr0, ID_AA64DFR0, PMUVER) != 0xf;
+    return FIELD_EX64(id->id_aa64dfr0, ID_AA64DFR0, PMUVER) >= 5 &&
+        FIELD_EX64(id->id_aa64dfr0, ID_AA64DFR0, PMUVER) != 0xf;
 }
 
 /*
-- 
2.20.1