18.02.2020 14:00, Andrey Shinkevich wrote:
> On 17/02/2020 18:02, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
>> Rename dirty_bitmap_mig_cleanup to dirty_bitmap_do_save_cleanup, to
>> stress that it is on save part.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
>> ---
>> migration/block-dirty-bitmap.c | 8 ++++----
>> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/migration/block-dirty-bitmap.c b/migration/block-dirty-bitmap.c
>> index 73792ab005..4e8959ae52 100644
>> --- a/migration/block-dirty-bitmap.c
>> +++ b/migration/block-dirty-bitmap.c
>> @@ -259,7 +259,7 @@ static void send_bitmap_bits(QEMUFile *f, SaveBitmapState *dbms,
>> }
>> /* Called with iothread lock taken. */
>> -static void dirty_bitmap_mig_cleanup(void)
>> +static void dirty_bitmap_do_save_cleanup(void)
>> {
>> SaveBitmapState *dbms;
>> @@ -338,7 +338,7 @@ static int init_dirty_bitmap_migration(void)
>> return 0;
>> fail:
>> - dirty_bitmap_mig_cleanup();
>> + dirty_bitmap_do_save_cleanup();
>> return -1;
>> }
>> @@ -377,7 +377,7 @@ static void bulk_phase(QEMUFile *f, bool limit)
>> /* for SaveVMHandlers */
>> static void dirty_bitmap_save_cleanup(void *opaque)
>> {
>> - dirty_bitmap_mig_cleanup();
>> + dirty_bitmap_do_save_cleanup();
>> }
>> static int dirty_bitmap_save_iterate(QEMUFile *f, void *opaque)
>> @@ -412,7 +412,7 @@ static int dirty_bitmap_save_complete(QEMUFile *f, void *opaque)
>> trace_dirty_bitmap_save_complete_finish();
>> - dirty_bitmap_mig_cleanup();
>> + dirty_bitmap_do_save_cleanup();
>> return 0;
>> }
>>
>
> At the next opportunity, I would suggest the name like
> "dirty_bitmap_do_clean_after_saving()"
> and similar for dirty_bitmap_save_cleanup()
> "dirty_bitmap_clean_after_saving()".
I'd keep my naming, it corresponds to .save_cleanup handler name.
>
> Reviewed-by: Andrey Shinkevich <andrey.shinkevich@virtuozzo.com>
--
Best regards,
Vladimir