[PATCH] docs/devel: fix stable process doc formatting

Cornelia Huck posted 1 patch 36 weeks ago
Test docker-mingw@fedora passed
Test checkpatch passed
Test docker-quick@centos7 passed
Test FreeBSD passed
Patches applied successfully (tree, apply log)
git fetch https://github.com/patchew-project/qemu tags/patchew/20200113103023.31255-1-cohuck@redhat.com
docs/devel/stable-process.rst | 6 ++++--
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

[PATCH] docs/devel: fix stable process doc formatting

Posted by Cornelia Huck 36 weeks ago
Enumeration of stable criteria needs proper bullet points.

Signed-off-by: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
---
 docs/devel/stable-process.rst | 6 ++++--
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/docs/devel/stable-process.rst b/docs/devel/stable-process.rst
index 98736a9ea487..e541b983fac7 100644
--- a/docs/devel/stable-process.rst
+++ b/docs/devel/stable-process.rst
@@ -18,8 +18,10 @@ What should go into a stable release?
 -------------------------------------
 
 Generally, the following patches are considered stable material:
-- Patches that fix severe issues, like fixes for CVEs
-- Patches that fix regressions
+
+* Patches that fix severe issues, like fixes for CVEs
+
+* Patches that fix regressions
 
 If you think the patch would be important for users of the current release
 (or for a distribution picking fixes), it is usually a good candidate
-- 
2.21.1


Re: [PATCH] docs/devel: fix stable process doc formatting

Posted by Cornelia Huck 34 weeks ago
On Mon, 13 Jan 2020 11:30:23 +0100
Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com> wrote:

> Enumeration of stable criteria needs proper bullet points.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
> ---
>  docs/devel/stable-process.rst | 6 ++++--
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/docs/devel/stable-process.rst b/docs/devel/stable-process.rst
> index 98736a9ea487..e541b983fac7 100644
> --- a/docs/devel/stable-process.rst
> +++ b/docs/devel/stable-process.rst
> @@ -18,8 +18,10 @@ What should go into a stable release?
>  -------------------------------------
>  
>  Generally, the following patches are considered stable material:
> -- Patches that fix severe issues, like fixes for CVEs
> -- Patches that fix regressions
> +
> +* Patches that fix severe issues, like fixes for CVEs
> +
> +* Patches that fix regressions
>  
>  If you think the patch would be important for users of the current release
>  (or for a distribution picking fixes), it is usually a good candidate

Queued to s390-next, so that it doesn't fall through the cracks.


Re: [PATCH] docs/devel: fix stable process doc formatting

Posted by Stefan Hajnoczi 36 weeks ago
On Mon, Jan 13, 2020 at 11:30:23AM +0100, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> Enumeration of stable criteria needs proper bullet points.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
> ---
>  docs/devel/stable-process.rst | 6 ++++--
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

Reviewed-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>