[PATCH v2 08/28] target/i386: Use cpu_*_mmuidx_ra instead of templates

Richard Henderson posted 28 patches 6 years, 1 month ago
There is a newer version of this series
[PATCH v2 08/28] target/i386: Use cpu_*_mmuidx_ra instead of templates
Posted by Richard Henderson 6 years, 1 month ago
Do not use exec/cpu_ldst_{,useronly_}template.h directly,
but instead use the functional interface.

Cc: Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
---
 target/i386/seg_helper.c | 56 ++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)

diff --git a/target/i386/seg_helper.c b/target/i386/seg_helper.c
index 87a627f9dc..b96de068ca 100644
--- a/target/i386/seg_helper.c
+++ b/target/i386/seg_helper.c
@@ -37,37 +37,37 @@
 # define LOG_PCALL_STATE(cpu) do { } while (0)
 #endif
 
-#ifdef CONFIG_USER_ONLY
-#define MEMSUFFIX _kernel
-#define DATA_SIZE 1
-#include "exec/cpu_ldst_useronly_template.h"
+/*
+ * TODO: Convert callers to compute cpu_mmu_index_kernel once
+ * and use *_mmuidx_ra directly.
+ */
+#define cpu_ldub_kernel_ra(e, p, r) \
+    cpu_ldub_mmuidx_ra(e, p, cpu_mmu_index_kernel(e), r)
+#define cpu_lduw_kernel_ra(e, p, r) \
+    cpu_lduw_mmuidx_ra(e, p, cpu_mmu_index_kernel(e), r)
+#define cpu_ldl_kernel_ra(e, p, r) \
+    cpu_ldl_mmuidx_ra(e, p, cpu_mmu_index_kernel(e), r)
+#define cpu_ldq_kernel_ra(e, p, r) \
+    cpu_ldq_mmuidx_ra(e, p, cpu_mmu_index_kernel(e), r)
 
-#define DATA_SIZE 2
-#include "exec/cpu_ldst_useronly_template.h"
+#define cpu_stb_kernel_ra(e, p, v, r) \
+    cpu_stb_mmuidx_ra(e, p, v, cpu_mmu_index_kernel(e), r)
+#define cpu_stw_kernel_ra(e, p, v, r) \
+    cpu_stw_mmuidx_ra(e, p, v, cpu_mmu_index_kernel(e), r)
+#define cpu_stl_kernel_ra(e, p, v, r) \
+    cpu_stl_mmuidx_ra(e, p, v, cpu_mmu_index_kernel(e), r)
+#define cpu_stq_kernel_ra(e, p, v, r) \
+    cpu_stq_mmuidx_ra(e, p, v, cpu_mmu_index_kernel(e), r)
 
-#define DATA_SIZE 4
-#include "exec/cpu_ldst_useronly_template.h"
+#define cpu_ldub_kernel(e, p)    cpu_ldub_kernel_ra(e, p, 0)
+#define cpu_lduw_kernel(e, p)    cpu_lduw_kernel_ra(e, p, 0)
+#define cpu_ldl_kernel(e, p)     cpu_ldl_kernel_ra(e, p, 0)
+#define cpu_ldq_kernel(e, p)     cpu_ldq_kernel_ra(e, p, 0)
 
-#define DATA_SIZE 8
-#include "exec/cpu_ldst_useronly_template.h"
-#undef MEMSUFFIX
-#else
-#define CPU_MMU_INDEX (cpu_mmu_index_kernel(env))
-#define MEMSUFFIX _kernel
-#define DATA_SIZE 1
-#include "exec/cpu_ldst_template.h"
-
-#define DATA_SIZE 2
-#include "exec/cpu_ldst_template.h"
-
-#define DATA_SIZE 4
-#include "exec/cpu_ldst_template.h"
-
-#define DATA_SIZE 8
-#include "exec/cpu_ldst_template.h"
-#undef CPU_MMU_INDEX
-#undef MEMSUFFIX
-#endif
+#define cpu_stb_kernel(e, p, v)  cpu_stb_kernel_ra(e, p, v, 0)
+#define cpu_stw_kernel(e, p, v)  cpu_stw_kernel_ra(e, p, v, 0)
+#define cpu_stl_kernel(e, p, v)  cpu_stl_kernel_ra(e, p, v, 0)
+#define cpu_stq_kernel(e, p, v)  cpu_stq_kernel_ra(e, p, v, 0)
 
 /* return non zero if error */
 static inline int load_segment_ra(CPUX86State *env, uint32_t *e1_ptr,
-- 
2.20.1


Re: [PATCH v2 08/28] target/i386: Use cpu_*_mmuidx_ra instead of templates
Posted by Alex Bennée 6 years, 1 month ago
Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org> writes:

> Do not use exec/cpu_ldst_{,useronly_}template.h directly,
> but instead use the functional interface.
>
> Cc: Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>
> Acked-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
> ---
>  target/i386/seg_helper.c | 56 ++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
>  1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/target/i386/seg_helper.c b/target/i386/seg_helper.c
> index 87a627f9dc..b96de068ca 100644
> --- a/target/i386/seg_helper.c
> +++ b/target/i386/seg_helper.c
> @@ -37,37 +37,37 @@
>  # define LOG_PCALL_STATE(cpu) do { } while (0)
>  #endif
>  
> -#ifdef CONFIG_USER_ONLY
> -#define MEMSUFFIX _kernel
> -#define DATA_SIZE 1
> -#include "exec/cpu_ldst_useronly_template.h"
> +/*
> + * TODO: Convert callers to compute cpu_mmu_index_kernel once
> + * and use *_mmuidx_ra directly.
> + */

I guess this would only be if it was a significant performance impact?
They seem to be mainly called for (I assume) infrequently called
helpers.

Anyway lgtm:

Reviewed-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org>


> +#define cpu_ldub_kernel_ra(e, p, r) \
> +    cpu_ldub_mmuidx_ra(e, p, cpu_mmu_index_kernel(e), r)
> +#define cpu_lduw_kernel_ra(e, p, r) \
> +    cpu_lduw_mmuidx_ra(e, p, cpu_mmu_index_kernel(e), r)
> +#define cpu_ldl_kernel_ra(e, p, r) \
> +    cpu_ldl_mmuidx_ra(e, p, cpu_mmu_index_kernel(e), r)
> +#define cpu_ldq_kernel_ra(e, p, r) \
> +    cpu_ldq_mmuidx_ra(e, p, cpu_mmu_index_kernel(e), r)
>  
> -#define DATA_SIZE 2
> -#include "exec/cpu_ldst_useronly_template.h"
> +#define cpu_stb_kernel_ra(e, p, v, r) \
> +    cpu_stb_mmuidx_ra(e, p, v, cpu_mmu_index_kernel(e), r)
> +#define cpu_stw_kernel_ra(e, p, v, r) \
> +    cpu_stw_mmuidx_ra(e, p, v, cpu_mmu_index_kernel(e), r)
> +#define cpu_stl_kernel_ra(e, p, v, r) \
> +    cpu_stl_mmuidx_ra(e, p, v, cpu_mmu_index_kernel(e), r)
> +#define cpu_stq_kernel_ra(e, p, v, r) \
> +    cpu_stq_mmuidx_ra(e, p, v, cpu_mmu_index_kernel(e), r)
>  
> -#define DATA_SIZE 4
> -#include "exec/cpu_ldst_useronly_template.h"
> +#define cpu_ldub_kernel(e, p)    cpu_ldub_kernel_ra(e, p, 0)
> +#define cpu_lduw_kernel(e, p)    cpu_lduw_kernel_ra(e, p, 0)
> +#define cpu_ldl_kernel(e, p)     cpu_ldl_kernel_ra(e, p, 0)
> +#define cpu_ldq_kernel(e, p)     cpu_ldq_kernel_ra(e, p, 0)
>  
> -#define DATA_SIZE 8
> -#include "exec/cpu_ldst_useronly_template.h"
> -#undef MEMSUFFIX
> -#else
> -#define CPU_MMU_INDEX (cpu_mmu_index_kernel(env))
> -#define MEMSUFFIX _kernel
> -#define DATA_SIZE 1
> -#include "exec/cpu_ldst_template.h"
> -
> -#define DATA_SIZE 2
> -#include "exec/cpu_ldst_template.h"
> -
> -#define DATA_SIZE 4
> -#include "exec/cpu_ldst_template.h"
> -
> -#define DATA_SIZE 8
> -#include "exec/cpu_ldst_template.h"
> -#undef CPU_MMU_INDEX
> -#undef MEMSUFFIX
> -#endif
> +#define cpu_stb_kernel(e, p, v)  cpu_stb_kernel_ra(e, p, v, 0)
> +#define cpu_stw_kernel(e, p, v)  cpu_stw_kernel_ra(e, p, v, 0)
> +#define cpu_stl_kernel(e, p, v)  cpu_stl_kernel_ra(e, p, v, 0)
> +#define cpu_stq_kernel(e, p, v)  cpu_stq_kernel_ra(e, p, v, 0)
>  
>  /* return non zero if error */
>  static inline int load_segment_ra(CPUX86State *env, uint32_t *e1_ptr,


-- 
Alex Bennée

Re: [PATCH v2 08/28] target/i386: Use cpu_*_mmuidx_ra instead of templates
Posted by Richard Henderson 6 years, 1 month ago
On 12/21/19 4:42 AM, Alex Bennée wrote:
>> +/*
>> + * TODO: Convert callers to compute cpu_mmu_index_kernel once
>> + * and use *_mmuidx_ra directly.
>> + */
> 
> I guess this would only be if it was a significant performance impact?
> They seem to be mainly called for (I assume) infrequently called
> helpers.

Yes, they are infrequent.

But if you expose all of the hidden cpu_mmu_index_kernel() invocations, one
should immediately ask why we're not caching the result in a local variable.
If for nothing else, readability.


r~